Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pres Of Unregulated Private 'Bank' Pleads Guilty For Role In Ponzi Scheme

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:20 PM
Original message
Pres Of Unregulated Private 'Bank' Pleads Guilty For Role In Ponzi Scheme
And this asshat was transferred to Elko, Nevada to run the Indian Health Clinic there. Wonderful.

PHOENIX – Edward James Driving Hawk, Sr., 71, of Chandler, Arizona, pleaded guilty on September 6, 2006 to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, in federal district court in Phoenix.

Driving Hawk had been charged based on his role in a ponzi scheme operated through his company, U.S. Reservation Bank and Trust ("USRBT"). USRBT was neither a bank nor a trust, but rather an investment company. USRBT used an Indian Chief logo on its materials and promoted itself as a bank "owned and managed by Indians for Indians" in order to exaggerate its ties to Native American communities and as a means of influencing potential investors. Between September 2000 and February 2002, USRBT recruited investors to deposit upwards of $1,000,000 in exchange for a promise of future high returns.

USRBT commingled the investor funds, rather than holding them in separate, interestbearing accounts. Driving Hawk and others took money directly from depositor's investments. Driving Hawk received $35,000 per month during the course of the scheme, and also took additional money from the investor deposits to distribute to his own family members.

A conviction for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment, a fine of $250,000 or both. In determining an actual sentence, Judge Roslyn O. Silver will consult the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide appropriate sentencing ranges. The judge, however, is not bound by those guidelines in determining a sentence.

more...

http://lawfuel.com/show-release.asp?ID=7883
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC