Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the consensus about media coverage of the Clarke story?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:46 AM
Original message
What's the consensus about media coverage of the Clarke story?
How is the media doing covering the story today? What do you think?

Honestly, I can't decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Flourish this morning
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 11:49 AM by ewagner
Now CNN has just short bits on it...

Skimmed through the cable channels. Nothing at the moment on MSNBC ....Faux doing Lacy...

Maybe Blitzer will be on it at 11AM Central time.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cndi Gets More Play Than Clarke


CSPAN had a great segment with call ins.
Everyone else that I clicked into had 'Leeza RiceBowl defending her man and defending herself and lies lies lies.

Clarke seemed to be overshadowed by Condi IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does it matter? Haven't we seen time and again...
That even when an issue gets hammered in the media, that the general public just does a collective yawn? We saw it with Awol and with Plame and with O'Neill and countless other times. Most people don't pay attention to political stuff beyond the surface and all of these issues require them to spend time on and think about, which by and large americans are unwilling to do.

I'm not hopeful this will have any more lasting impact than any of those other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roscoeroscoe Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. good morning america was givin' it to 'em~
with charlie asking the tough questions. clarke looked really serious. rice was impossible to believe.
supposedly today show had wesley clark commenting, but we couldn't catch up with that segment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good Morning America had Clarke on
first thing this morning. Whenever he speaks it is always jaw-dropping bad news for shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In that case I hope he never stops talking.
Perhaps we could find some way to make a Bruce Willis action movie and a Broadway musical out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robnycny Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hamas leader killing...
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 12:10 PM by robnycny
...is overshadowing the Clarke coverage on most mainstream "news" sites... but it is the second lead story. Of course, they are providing ample room for Condi-sleez' rebuttal of spin and lies.

"After we had all been briefed on the al Qaeda threat and understood what the Clinton administration had been doing, he wanted another meeting. I didn't think another meeting was necessary. The principals knew what the problem was, and what we needed was a strategy."

Rice said Clarke's memo "was a series of ideas, a series of steps, most of which, by the way, we did (undertake) within a matter of months." Those steps included accelerating arming U.S. Predator drones and increasing counter-terrorism funding, she said.

"These were steps that he said would roll back al Qaeda over a three- to five-year period. This was not going to address the quote, 'urgent threat of September 11th,'" she said. - Condi Sleeze

WHAT?!?! :mad:

edit: a tiny typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC