Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT falsely suggested that only Clinton administration officials objected to ABC's "Path to 9/11"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 01:33 AM
Original message
NYT falsely suggested that only Clinton administration officials objected to ABC's "Path to 9/11"
Media Matters for America: Again ignoring numerous falsehoods, NY Times falsely suggested that only Clinton administration officials objected to ABC's Path to 9/11

In a May 14 article about the upcoming HBO film Recount, New York Times writer Edward Wyatt reported, "In 2006 ABC made changes to 'The Path to 9/11' after complaints from former Clinton administration officials that it portrayed them as less than vigilant in their pursuit of Osama bin Laden," but did not note that, despite editing, the final version of the ABC miniseries still included several fabricated scenes, falsehoods, and sharp discrepancies between its account of certain events and the findings laid out in the 9-11 Commission's report. Indeed, Wyatt himself wrote in a September 18, 2006, Times article: "It's little wonder that ABC's mini-series 'The Path to 9/11' drew stinging criticism earlier this month for its invented scenes, fabricated dialogue and unsubstantiated accounts of how the Clinton and Bush administrations conducted themselves in the years encompassing the World Trade Center attacks of 1993 and 2001." These falsehoods and discrepancies have been noted by Media Matters for America and numerous others.

In mentioning only "complaints from former Clinton administration officials" -- and not actual falsehoods in the movie -- the May 14 article repeated the Times' 2006 suggestion that criticism of the movie was leveled exclusively by former Clinton officials upset at their portrayal in the film. In fact, the film was criticized for its falsehoods regarding both the Clinton and the Bush administrations' handling of the terrorist threat by people from across the political spectrum, including journalists and participants in the film's production as well as a number of conservative commentators, as Media Matters has documented....

http://mediamatters.org/items/200805160006?f=h_latest
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media so enjoys lying about the Clintons
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. see, i didn't se that as the point of the article.
i saw it as the NYT ignoring all the other people who had a problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think my post "ABC, stop lying about my friend John O'Neill" is still in the archives.
I complained loudly because of their misrepresentation of John O'Neill, and I'm as far from a Clinton Administration official as you can find on this side of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC