Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times endorsement: Hillary Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:01 AM
Original message
New York Times endorsement: Hillary Clinton
Primary Choices: Hillary Clinton
Published: January 25, 2008

....As Democrats look ahead to the primaries in the biggest states on Feb. 5, The Times’s editorial board strongly recommends that they select Hillary Clinton as their nominee for the 2008 presidential election....

***

Mr. Obama has built an exciting campaign around the notion of change, but holds no monopoly on ideas that would repair the governing of America. Mrs. Clinton sometimes overstates the importance of résumé. Hearing her talk about the presidency, her policies and answers for America’s big problems, we are hugely impressed by the depth of her knowledge, by the force of her intellect and by the breadth of, yes, her experience.

It is unfair, especially after seven years of Mr. Bush’s inept leadership, but any Democrat will face tougher questioning about his or her fitness to be commander in chief. Mrs. Clinton has more than cleared that bar, using her years in the Senate well to immerse herself in national security issues, and has won the respect of world leaders and many in the American military. She would be a strong commander in chief.

Domestically, Mrs. Clinton has tackled complex policy issues, sometimes failing. She has shown a willingness to learn and change. Her current proposals on health insurance reflect a clear shift from her first, famously disastrous foray into the issue. She has learned that powerful interests cannot simply be left out of the meetings. She understands that all Americans must be covered — but must be allowed to choose their coverage, including keeping their current plans. Mr. Obama may also be capable of tackling such issues, but we have not yet seen it. Voters have to judge candidates not just on the promise they hold, but also on the here and now....

The potential upside of a great Obama presidency is enticing, but this country faces huge problems, and will no doubt be facing more that we can’t foresee. The next president needs to start immediately on challenges that will require concrete solutions, resolve, and the ability to make government work. Mrs. Clinton is more qualified, right now, to be president....

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/opinion/25fri1.html?pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, the Times, we canbelieve what they say...riiiight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. More than we can believe what you say...
That's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey, what's that for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "The TIMES" is a multiple-arena consideration.
Frank Rich? I'd read him anytime, anywhere, on any topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I actually posted this here in the Media forum, just for the record. Will also post...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 02:17 AM by DeepModem Mom
endorsements, if allowed, from the other major papers when they're made -- and for whatever candidate.

On edit: I understand, for example, that the L.A. Times is planning to endorse for the first time, I think, since the Seventies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Congratulations to Senator Clinton on an extremely high-profile endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Stepford endorsement for Stepford voters.
From the paper that brought you the WMD Peril, cheered on the housing bubble, and just hired neocon Bill Kristol as columnist...

Um, thanks, but no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC