Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Media is Dean-Bashing Already

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
R_Ram_U Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:32 PM
Original message
The Media is Dean-Bashing Already

In yesterday's Washington Post, reporter Evelyn Nieves in the article
"Short-Fused Populist, Breathing Fire at Bush" has already started the Dean-bashing. The press has already decided that they don't like
Howard Dean, so they're going to do to him the same thing that they did
to Al Gore.

Here's my analysis of that article:

She starts off by writing: "Ropy veins popped out of his neck, blood
rushed to his cheeks, and his eyes, normally blue-gray, flashed black,
all dilated pupils." Like she was really close enough to see his pupils.
She continues, "President Bush is all wrong, he says:
wrong on the economy, wrong on the environment, wrong on health care and
affirmative action and peace and justice for all." Wonder why she added
the "peace and justice for all" bit. This thing is starting to read like
some Maureen Dowd Column on Bill Clinton.

She also tries desperately to make Howard Dean out as some Blue Blood
ascot-wearing millionaire. "Howard Brush Dean III, 54, a Park
Avenue-bred medical doctor, is the Democrats' angry Everyman, heading to
Washington to make things right." What is she supposed to mean by "Park
Avenue-bred," and "Democrats' angry Everyman." Like Bush was born the
son of a toothless sharecropper or is somehow an obvious populist-the
very wealthy are people too.

She also comments on his lack of prospects as a candidate: "Dean's
passionate, bare-fisted pounding at the Washington power structure is
obviously working, at least for now." What is she implying, "at least
for now" like in a couple of months he'll be out of the campaign or
something. She even manages to disparage Dean's height, calling him "the
shortish (about 5-foot-8) contender." If anything dean is of average
height. The funniest part of the article is when she comments on Dean's
diplomatic skills, saying "...a few more choice words on his part, and
critics will be questioning whether Dean has the diplomatic skills
needed to be the leader of the free world." Excuse me; I wasn't aware
George W. got an 800 on the Verbal part of his SATs. I guess she
misunderestimated George W's verbal skills. I'm sure those critics will
nail Dean to the wall for his undiplomatic abilities. Why, he might even
think that the UN is somehow, dare I say it, a rubber stamp.

When she comments on Dean's Meet the Press interview, "he fumbled on
some basic questions, such as the size of the military..." she neglects to
mention that Howard Dean said "As someone who's running in the
Democratic Party primary, I know that it's somewhere in the neighborhood
of one to two million people, but I don't know the exact number, and I
don't think I need to know that to run in the Democratic Party primary."
I didn't realize that the exact number of troops on active duty was
somehow a "basic question." Isn't that number classified anyway? In any
case Dean did correctly estimate the number as being "in the
neighborhood of one to two million" troops.

Then she starts questioning his background as the governor of a small
state. She refers to Vermont as "a one-area-code state." But Montana is
a "one area code state." Yet if its Republican governor had been running
for president, would she have summarized it as such? She describes Dean
as "confident enough to tell voters that if he could balance the budget,
provide almost universal health care and protect open space in Vermont
(pop. 609,000), he could do it for the whole country." As if he can't do
it for the whole country because Vermont (pop. 609,000) isn't Texas
(pop. 21,325,018), which Bush left in a total mess anyway. The press
would have known this had they asked him in 2000 like they were supposed
to.

Then she begins to reveal Dean's upper-class roots. "Dean comes from
money-his father, grandfather and great-grandfather were investment
bankers; he summered in Sag Harbor, part of the Long Island playground
that includes the Hamptons, and went to Yale." I guess she's just a
hard-working muckraker, exposing the elite's abuse of the workingman.
Wait a second, wasn't Bush's father an oil tycoon who later became
president, and his grandfather a real Blue Blood who was senator from
Connecticut. Wait a second, didn't Bush go to Yale. I guess Bush isn't
the son of a toothless sharecropper after all. Notice how she says "he
summered in Sag Harbor, part of the Long Island playground that includes
the Hamptons." Let's face it, this must have been like 30 years ago or
something, back then "the Hamptons" was just farmland, with some beach
in front of it. In any case had he summered in Long Beach, California,
she would have written that it was a part of the country that included
Beverly Hills. About Vermont politics she writes, "entering politics
there was relatively easy." Bush must've had it real tough in Texas,
where your father has to be an oil tycoon so that you can be governor.

She even deftly exposes Dean's Vermont record as a fiscal conservative,
showing, again, her muckraking prowess. As governor "Dean was no
fire-breather. He insisted on balancing the budget above all else. He
went from being against the death penalty to supporting it in limited
cases. He refused to fund social programs without making sure the state
could pay its bills first." Wouldn't you know it, Dean "refused to fund
social programs without making sure the state could pay its bills
first." Thank God we have a Real Man in the Whitehouse, where the rich
will get their tax cut, even if we have to run record high deficits. She
thinks she's so smart for writing this. Like Vermont is a bed of Liberal
activism anyway. It's probably the most Libertarian state in the
country. It's sole representative, and one of its senators are
Independent. What was she thinking? That's not fair of me.

I should say that towards the end of the article she does redeem herself
somewhat, describing his wife, and his first entry into local politics.
It was creating a scenic bike-path that's close to his house. She also
goes onto describe his appearance in front of the California Teachers
Association. She writes: "'I taught eighth-grade social studies for
three months,' said, 'so I can personally say that I am the only
person running for the presidency of the United States that knows what
it's like to stand up without being able to go to the bathroom for five
hours.' Bingo. After 15 minutes, Dean told the audience he was going to
wrap it up. 'Awwww' pulsed through the ballroom."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11710-2003Jul5.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
study_war_no_more Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmmmm
Didn't Dean sign the patriot act? he also opposes any cuts to the Pentagon which makes me very hesitant to support him. I think these are two very important issues. I am at this point sticking to Dennis K, hey eating Ben and Jerry'sand listening to Willie Nelson doesn't look to bad after court Bush.
All we are saying is give peace a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hackwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Dean was a GOVERNOR!!!
...not a Senator, so how could he "sign" the Patriot Act?

Sheesh. Get informed, will ya? No wonder Bush is President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He did NOT sign the USPA
He coudl not, he is NOT a member of the Federal Legislature....

As to the DoD, you know it does not matter who takes over, they will have to stop spending in some sense because nobody will be able to afford it.

What is comming down the pike is a Great Depresion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quilp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've even heard "Dean's problem is he's not likable"!!
This was on Charlie Rose. Safire bashed Dean today. Rove claims he wants to "bring him on". Which reminds me; you'd think Reps would avoid talking about anyone's diplomatic skills, wouldn't you? But I suppose they have their RNC orders. Yes, I think they are afraid of Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. She starts out badly tripping up
everyone knows that dialated pupils indicate feeling of warmth and affection, contracted pupils are associated with aggression and fear. It's pretty easy for any reader to see from that point on that she's just making sh*t up as she goes.

The press will pull this sort of nonsense with any democratic contender, IMHO. Fortunately, the last poll I saw regarding to people's trust of the press showed that 95% think the media is untrustworthy. We aren't the only ones who notice what's going on.

Guardian America can't get here soon enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why are we surprised
Remember Gore? They're going to lie, spin, distort everything the Democrat candidate says, wears, sighs whatever. We know the game - screw the media we all need to work in the trenches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mjb4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush must be scared as HELL
the 50-50 nation wants a WAR. America is hurting and needs to take out its frustrations on one another. I think we will get to see it in the coming elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJets Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You know it's being spun
and the catch-phrase of the week is how pathetic the Dem-Pres candidates are.So we should all support drafting wesley Clark or Hillary or should go with Holy Joe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kubi Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. 50/50 war
Which is a real shame since neither party has much to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. You know this is the way I see it
We could nominate good ol' Adolph... they would somehow spin him as a rabid communist... this is the nature of the Press.

So this is already comming back and biting the So Called Liberal Media, as people slowly put two plus two together.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC