Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More good news for Kerry in Iowa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:32 PM
Original message
More good news for Kerry in Iowa
WH '04 Dem Caucus Matchup
(margin of error +/- 4.4%)

Dean 24%
Kerry 21%
Gephardt 21%
Edwards 10%
Clark 5%
Lieberman 5%
Kucinich 3%
Braun 1%
Sharpton -
A Mellman Group (D) poll; conducted 10/13 for Sen. John Kerry (D-MA); surveyed 500 likely 1/19 IA caucus-goers; margin of error +/- 4.4% (release, 10/23). The polling memo notes that Kerry boasts "an extremely positive" 69% favorable vs. 12% unfavorable rating -- "yielding the highest favorable-unfavorable ratio in the field."

The Mellman Group notes that their poll, "unlike most public polls, drew its sample from a list of voters who have a history of participation in Iowa Democratic primaries and caucuses. Most public polls rely on simple and hugely inflated self reports of likely caucus participation" (release, 10/23).

http://www.johnkerry.com/news/releases/pr_2003_1023.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dagaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like Kerry is starting to take the gloves off
I saw where he's now campaigning at work places and letting people know that Dean and Gephart bith want to take away the child tax credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The Child Tax Credit is Unfair
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 03:45 PM by HFishbine
Why should upper-income parents get a special tax credit just because they have kids? Having kids generates a cost to society (education, healthcare, etc) and people who are not parents end up paying a greater share because they don't have kids.

As a method of helping to keep families out of poverty, it's fine. But as a gift to families making 60,000/year it's unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yeah.
A family of four making $60k/year is upper-income? Go ahead and run on that platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I make more than that as a family of four
and if you take my child tax credit away we will go broke. $60,000 does not go far these days. Please don't pit poor against slightly less poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Okay, okay, oaky
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 04:20 PM by HFishbine
What do I know? You tell me? $70k, $80k, $90k? All I know is that I too could use an extra $600 a year. I work just as hard as anybody and, as a single person, I'm not repsonsible for creating an additional cost for society.

I don't know where the line should be drawn, I'll defer to those who know better. All I know is that it's pretty damn unfair that I have $150 in my savings account while some people are getting a $600 or more tax break so that they can buy a new DVD player while I pay a greater share of their children's education than they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. 'an additional cost for society'
Umm, children are more than 'an additional cost for society' children are the future of our society... do you believe you shouldn't have to pay for public education because you have no children? ... are you saying you are philosophically opposed to the Earned Income Credit, that you don't believe the government should help ease the cost of raising children for those who are not rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Careful now
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 04:49 PM by HFishbine
Please don't put words in my mouth or misconstrue my statements.

I DID NOT say I shouldn't have to pay for public education. I believe I should, for the very reason you mention -- that children are more than an additional cost to society.. What I DO THINK though, is that I should not have to pay a greater share than parents. Even an equal share would be more palatable.

I most certainly DID NOT say that the government shouldn't ease the cost of raising children for those who are not rich. What I DO THINK though, is that those who are perfectly capable of paying for the cost of raising a child should not receive a government hand out, especially when you consider that such actions simply shifts a greater burden of society's cost for children to those who don't have any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well you don't pay a greater share than their parents. That's just silly
I mean it is really, really out there. How much do you think it costs to raise children? You actually believe that because of the EIC you are paying a larger share of raising children than their parents? :eyes:

And I did not accuse you of saying anything or put any words in your mouth - I ASKED if that was what you meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. What about a family of two
making $60k?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Add up the bills.
It ain't much: taxes, mortgage, car-payments, insurance (health+car), utilities. Utilities is where things are getting out of hand: Electric, Gas, Phone, Cell-Phones, Internet, Water+Sewer, Garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dagaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. It sells politically though
Most people are willing to support education and healthcare even if they don't have kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry's favorable/unfavorable should remain high
He is an outstanding candidate and great person, and with Graham's departure he has the best and longest resume. (Unless you like 4 stars..ha ha!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting.
I'd be curious to see what the DNC's internal polls look like there. I have only heard a few reports, but none from Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please
A poll paid for by the Kerry campaign.

I'd have a little more faith if they'd post the complete survey and methedology. Touting the "highest favorable-unfavorable ratio in the field" as the best thing the poll reports seems a little suspect. Who had the highest favorable rating? Who had the highest unfavorable rating? If the poll was so targeted, why the high MOE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. 4.4% for a state poll is a high MoE?
Hah!Zogby's latest from iowa had an MoE of 4.5%

Get your facts straight and vote for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. 4.4% for a state poll is a high MoE?
Hah!Zogby's latest from iowa had an MoE of 4.5%

Get your facts straight and vote for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Okay, I heard you the first time
for a poll that was supposedly SO TARGETED was what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. It was about the sample they chose, not MoE
Geez, why speculate when you clearly know nothing about poll methodology. Hell, neither do I. But then again, I don't go crying about MoE everytime I see a poll I don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting
I always thought that Gep would be Dean's chief opponent in Iowa, but now Gep and Kerry are tied and Dean slightly ahead. Most recent Iowa poll had Gep taking a slight lead with Dean a solid second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. This poll underrepresents Dean's support
voters who have a history of participation in Iowa Democratic primaries and caucuses

Dean will be bring many new folks into the caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Excellent point!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. yet among this group Dean still leads
or statiscally tied with Gep and Kerry. I thought among this group with a history of attending caucuses that Gep would be leading given he is well known in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And Kerry Will Bring Many Old Folks To The Caucuses
Ready to blast "Newt-lite" out of the water.

(Notice the scare quotes? That's not me saying it!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady President Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Agreed
I agree that this poll may not completely reflect Dean's numbers, but it is a positive sign for Kerry vs. Gephardt, who was supposed to own Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No question about it...a great poll for Kerry considering everyone ...
has been calling it a Dean-Gep race. If Kerry can pull off a 1st or 2nd in Iowa, NH will be wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. It is a good poll
for Kerry and a not so bad one for Dean since among consistent caucus goers Dean is still leading when it would seem that Gep should be doing best among this group. However, it will be interesting to see if any independent polls will back up the results of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJcairo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:16 PM
Original message
This poll confirms early internal Edwards polling
which had Dean at 21% Kerry at 20% and Gep at 18%.

The bottom line: Kerry is doing better than expected but, if you take into account independent polling, the race is a toss up between Gep and Dean.

How silly it is that we sacrifice our democracy to a bunch of corn eaters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. a lot of Dean voters don't have a history of participation..
because it is the first they will participate in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Only the mathematically challenged should cosider this good news!!!!!!!!!
Dean '04...The New Democratic Leader of the NEW Democratic Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Is that like the old green party?
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 07:44 PM by SahaleArm
Dean's support is getting to be as much an exercise in hagiography as anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC