Note: The text has been ribbed for your pleasure. Read the full text here (especially Kucinich fans):
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0826-04.htmLet's take Howard Dean at his word: "I was a triangulator before Clinton was a triangulator. In my soul, I'm a moderate." Plenty of evidence backs up that comment by the former Vermont governor to the New York Times Magazine a few months ago.
Dean clearly finds grassroots progressives to be quite useful for his purposes. But is he truly useful for ours?
Economic justice has been a much lower priority (than a balanced budget).
Gov. Dean did not mind polarizing with poor people, but he got along better with the corporate sector. "Conservative Vermont business leaders praise Dean's record and his unceasing efforts to balance the budget, even though Vermont is the only state where a balanced budget is not constitutionally required," Business Week reported in its August 11 (2003) edition.
According to Business Week, "those who know him best believe Dean is moving to the left to boost his chances of winning the nomination." A longtime Dean backer named Bill Stenger, a Vermont Republican who's president of Jay Peak Resort, predicted: "If he gets the nomination, he'll run back to the center and be more mainstream."
The magazine added: "Business leaders were especially impressed with the way Dean went to bat for them if they got snarled in the state's stringent environmental regulations."
Howard Dean does deserve some credit as a foe of the war. Yet it would be a mistake to view him as an opponent of militarism. Dean seems to agree. During an August 23 interview with the Washington Post, he said: "I don't even consider myself a dove."
Overall, the problem with puffing up Dean -- or claiming that he represents progressive values -- goes beyond a failure of truth-in-labeling. It also involves an insidious redefinition, in public discourse, of what it means to be progressive in the first place.
I admire the creativity and commitment that many activists have brought to their work for Dean. Yet his campaign for the nomination offers few benefits and major pitfalls. If Dean becomes the Democratic presidential candidate next year, at that point there would be many good reasons to see him as a practical tool for defeating Bush. But in the meantime, progressive energies and support should go elsewhere.