Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV - Let's Support Rep Holt - Write Letters to Houes Administration Cmte.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 05:47 PM
Original message
BBV - Let's Support Rep Holt - Write Letters to Houes Administration Cmte.
Rep. Holt was on Democracy Now this AM talking about his concern re: Diebold. He said that while some house dems are concerned, there is total silence from the GOP. (shocking isn't it?)
Anyway, I thought we could help him out. When I phoned his office they suggested we write to members of the Committee on House Administration and tell them to support his: VOTER CONFIDENCE AND INCREASED ACCESSIBLITY ACT OF 2003 (HR2239)

Republican Members
Rep. Robert W. Ney, (R-OH) Chairman
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers, (R-MI)
Rep. John L. Mica (R-FL)
Rep. John Linder (R-GA)
Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-CA)
Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-NY)


Democratic Members
Rep. John B. Larson (D-CT) Ranking Member
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA)
Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA)



THE VOTER CONFIDENCE AND INCREASED ACCESSIBLITY ACT OF 2003

On May 22, Rep. Rush Holt responded to the growing chorus of concern from election reform specialists and computer security experts about the integrity of future elections by introducing reform legislation, The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003 (H.R. 2239). The measure would require all voting machines to produce an actual paper record by 2004 that voters can view to check the accuracy of their votes and that election officials can use to verify votes in the event of a computer malfunction, hacking, or other irregularity. Experts often refer to this paper record as a “voter-verified paper trail.”

“We cannot afford nor can we permit another major assault on the integrity of the American electoral process,” said Rep. Rush Holt. “Imagine it’s Election Day 2004. You enter your local polling place and go to cast your vote on a brand new “touch screen” voting machine. The screen says your vote has been counted. As you exit the voting booth, however, you begin to wonder. How do I know if the machine actually recorded my vote? The fact is, you don’t.”

more from Rep. Holt website:

http://holt.house.gov/display2.cfm?id=6282&type=Home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Committee on House Administration?
Well, if Holt's office thinks that's where we should focus, then so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'll Call The Committee Tomorrow Just To Make
sure...no need to send e-mails to the wrong committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ehlers is my Congressman, in fact.
Edited on Thu Oct-30-03 06:22 PM by ih8thegop
Here's what I wrote to him:

As a member of the House Administration Committee, I ask that you support the VOTER CONFIDENCE AND INCREASED ACCESSIBLITY ACT OF 2003 (HR 2239), sponsored by Rush Holt.

Holt explains it well. He recently said, "We cannot afford nor can we permit another major assault on the integrity of the American electoral process. Imagine it’s Election Day 2004. You enter your local polling place and go to cast your vote on a brand new 'touch screen' voting machine. The screen says your vote has been counted. As you exit the voting booth, however, you begin to wonder. How do I know if the machine actually recorded my vote? The fact is, you don’t."

Our democracy - for which millions have fought and many have died - is at stake. Let's not tell our veterans they fought for nothing - they fought for our freedoms, our democracy, and for a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." Many of those veterans lost comrades on the battlefield. Did they die for nothing, or did they die for our freedoms? Mr. Ehlers, you have the opportunity to decide. Don't waste it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC