Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which generation do you think has the most intense experience in bed...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:56 AM
Original message
Poll question: Which generation do you think has the most intense experience in bed...
You know, not just the sex, but the emotional part, the closeness, the cuddles, the "wow" factor...

We'll use graduation year as the midpoint for a "generation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm going with 2011 because there is more access to free pron than ever before.
If we had this kind of pron when I was a youngin' I'd learn all the right moves if you catch my drift.
I'd imagine people can learn to be pron stars by picking up what the see on their screen.

That's all just speculation of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. do you consider "moves" to equate emotional closeness?
You have a lot to learn, if so.

The OP was asking which generation had more emotionally intimate sex, not more practiced moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah I know I stopped reading after the title. The title asked about intensity.
I don't really have an answer for the other part. I never thought of cuddle time being intense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Fake moves, fake moaning, fake orgasms, and dumb as shit lines - no "moves".
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:19 PM by HopeHoops
And two more words sum it ALL up: Ron Jeremy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your 1920s comment made me laugh...
it's actually the inverse.

The roaring 20s were probably the most debauched decade of the last century in American culture. Yes, the 1960s had free love and the 1950s had the highest rate of unwed pregnancy...the 1920s had flappers, legal prostitution in nearly half the nation, burlesque, the popular music was as dirty as the raunchiest of rap and just as layered with innuendo. The literature though is the difference in large...people read back then far far more than today. Henry Miller, D.H. Lawrence, Anais Nin all writing during the 1920s about their lifestyles in the 1920s. The Great Gastby(Fitzgerald) and The Sun Also Rises(Hemingway) were scandalous upon their publication...American culture had never seen a character like Lady Brett: she has sex with three different men in the book, enjoys herself and most-importantly nothing bad happens as a result. It destroyed the convention that sexually-liberated women must be punished and tragic characters. Jay Gatsby's lifestyle and that of his peers was the subject of outrage. It was a decade of intense cultural and sexual awakening...then the Depression happened and as often happens in downturn, people doubled-down on the embrace of traditional morality and repressed the culture-vanguard of the previous era...just as the 1970s/80s followed the 1960s and the current downturn is emboldening the RW to try to roll back sexual freedoms today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The RW only has sex when God tells them to do it to make more Republican idjits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. It has nothing to do with generations
it has to do with the time within a generation

lust or love within a generation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm going 20's because it was before much central heating.
But seriously, generations are more than ten years long. At least among humans. Dogs, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Have you seen the drug usage rates lately?
Hey, we mostly define our "generation" by our middle/high school music. That's about a ten year span.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I am reluctant to accept the idea that I am six generations old.
In the Bible that's about half of the total of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Fuck, in the Bible you would be an infant. Noah was like 900 when he built the ark with the dinos.
Frankly, I think they were using moon phases - translates better - I could see 75 there. The dinosaur thing is just a fucking joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC