that's how those things happen. Somewhere very early on in the creative process one writer says to another:
"Hey, wouldn't it be great if we had a bit of an unrequited sexual-tension or romantic element between {Jim/Pam, Gil/Sara, Mulder/Scully, House/Cuddy}, something to tease at but never fulfill."
or
"Perhaps we could hint at this thing from the backstory...I mean, it's a ret-con, let's just have some fun with it. Something that we can dangle like a carrot."
Then one moron starts a blog about the need to see what the writers have decided to hint at, then a few more voices join the choir. Then a few more. Then the producers catch on that it's a ratings driver and they lean on the writing staff to up that element of the show. Compromises are reached. The idiot masses, given a taste of what they want (a thing which will ultimately ruin the show), wail louder. The producers come back and push the writers further. One of several results ensues:
- The audience gets what it wants. This ruins the show. (See: CSI, The Office.)
- The writers/creators/geniuses/stars leave because they hate the direction things are going in...the show suffers before being put out of its' misery. (See: X-Files, CSI)
- The producers listen when the writers tell them "Do not give the audience any satisfaction! Just keep hinting at it and we get to keep the tension and the audiences will keep tuning in." Frequently, this also ruins the show because ever-more-absurd plot-devices must be utilized to move the action along on different fronts. (You can't just drop a storyline like that one, you have to substitute an "equally-promising" one to keep the moron producers in line.) (See: House)
This is why I decided after less than a year in this field to walk-away and sign-away all my residual rights. I'm happier as a low-income wage-slave for corporate monoliths.