|
He was posting on FB about the importance of voting NO on the latest proposition to rescind the rights for gays to marry. Needless to say, about twenty teenagers jumped all over him and at least one cited the APA as stating that there is no conclusive evidence as to how a person is, becomes, chooses, is born as or whatever, gay. The APA does in fact make this statement but goes on to point out that it really makes no difference, etc. This is the APA, not the AMA. Juergs was trying to point out the subtleties in the official statement but the people he was addressing did not even understand what the words "genetically determined" mean. One kid claimed that because homosexuality was "biological," therefore it was a choice and gay marriage should not be allowed...now, there are at least three and possibly more factual and logical errors in his thinking as expressed, yes? Juergen has decided people are "too stupid" to be worth his time and he gave up the fight and this frustrates him like it does all of us. My question: is anybody out there aware of the latest research done on the origins of homosexuality? NOT because I think that even matters, but because homophobics really, really do.
And let me say right now, I really don't want to offend or piss off anybody by my wording or even my inquiry: I want to give my son information to bolster his argument. Even if he doesn't win converts today, if he presents reasonable evidence these young people might rethink their bigoted position once they're away from Mom and Pop and the rest of their bigoted families.
|