Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“Wow.” “New Camaro.” “Holy friggin neo-retrogasm, I want one.”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:26 AM
Original message
“Wow.” “New Camaro.” “Holy friggin neo-retrogasm, I want one.”
Put an automatic transmission in a car, and you typically lose a few hundred (or thousand) bucks and that extra connection between man and machine. In the Chevrolet Camaro, you also lose 26 hp.

But you gain a free hand with which to return fist pumps or throw the bull’s horns to fellow F-body enthusiasts or crush Monster cans against your head. Also, you get simplified burnouts—billowing, tire-boiling annihilation is just a couple of stomps away. No tricky clutch-drop-to-brake dance or modulating pedal pressures, just mash the brake, mat the gas, and take a deep breath of vaporized vulcanized rubber. This—the ease with which it goes about its hooliganism—is what we imagine draws people to the automatic Camaro SS.

It also goes about its hooliganism rather quickly, with the 26-hp deficit going virtually unnoticed. The automatic Camaro went 0 to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 13.3 at 107 mph, figures that are on par with those of other SS Camaros we’ve tested. The automatic gearbox costs either $995 or $1185 depending on whether you start with a 1SS or 2SS model. That’s because, on the 2SS, the automatic is bundled with remote start, which is unavailable on the 1SS. Our tester had only one other option, the RS package. For $1200, it gets you different wheels, unique taillights, HID headlights with halo rings (think BMW), and—joy of joys!—body-color drip-rail molding.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q3/2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_automatic-short_take_road_test

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q3/2010_chevrolet_camaro_ss_automatic-short_take_road_test/gallery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. hubba hubba!!! Bitchin' Camaro!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. i sat in it at the dealer and it was a surprisingly tight fit
good effort for a first-year rollout, but the model still needs some tweaking (and it needs to drop a LOT of weight)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Light-weight cars and Government safety standards are not compatible
every car made in the past ten years has gained nearly 15% additional weight from improved safety equipment. It's just a fact of life. And it won't change unless we all move to Sumatra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. not just safety equipment
buyers now demand power seats and power everything, and loads of electronic trinkets -- that also bumps up the curb weight...

it's just a matter of engineering lightness in from the start of the design (which of course costs more money, so automakers only do it for high-end niche performance vehicles)...fwiw the Corvette's weight has remained pretty constant over the decade, so it can be done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jetboy Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. That car is mighty fine lookin'...
Man it's something else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But she don't notice me when I pass (she goes with other guys from out of my class)
...but that can't stop me from 'a thinkin' to myself...



:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jetboy Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah!
Luvs me some Eddie Cochran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. My 86-yo Dad is driving this camaro....
Edited on Thu Oct-01-09 09:59 AM by Patiod


1987

Actually, it was my mom's car. He wanted me to buy it from him, but I'm too tall to squeeze into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. There's something I don't like about the way it looks.
It's hard to articulate.

It looks cheap and designed by a committee. The rear view is especially bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder..........
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why does it look like a Dodge Charger?
Or kinda like a new Cadillac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Actually, the original Charger looked like the original Camaro
RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC