|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:22 PM Original message |
No female captains in Star Trek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Uhm, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Star Trek Voyager takes place in the 24th Century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. A better reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. and back to the 22nd century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. They never weren't allowed. Only Lester made the fruitloop comment; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 11:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Hey, the timeline has been altered so many times, who knows what really happened when? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTG of the PRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Did you watch last night too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. It's on right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Janice was also insane. It can be successfully argued she had an inferiority complex, based |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 07:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. OK, not the entire 23rd century apparently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. The world of sixties television didn't admit female captains. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's interesting when a fictional world changes alongside the real one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yep, and that, I think is the most promising part of ST. Which influenced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
46. Yet, in the 2009 movie, women are not depicted in any leadership roles. They always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. The 2009 movie is the same characters from the original series |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. The primary characters, yes. The Starfleet court judges, no. The captain of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Well, maybe they want to show that the 2200's were sexist like in Mad Men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deucemagnet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think it speaks to our chauvinism more than Star Fleet's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 11:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. And she wore pants! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deucemagnet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Star Trek is full of sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 11:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Denise Crosby wanted off the show. Yar's death was never about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. How would she have taken Worfs name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Jadzia Dax, wife of Worf son of Mogh of the House of Martok? Can you imagine having to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I didn't know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. She regretted the choice, which is why you see her return later on as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Dr Carol Marcus didn't take the name Kirk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Was she ever married to Kirk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I may be mis-remembering, but wasn't there a marriage contract that wasn't renewed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Hmm I dont remember that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Like I said, I could very well be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 09:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
56. the trek wiki |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TommyO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 01:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. I was actually researching this, and found the same sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Marcus and Kirk were never married. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 12:18 AM Response to Reply #35 |
70. There was almost a paternity suit, but Kirk's lawyer got him out of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #70 |
82. Practicing in the 23rd century and still hasn't lost a case! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
38. Most of those examples are from the 60s - of course it was "sexist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Very true. But some of it has persisted, only in a different format. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #38 |
63. Dr. Crusher is a shining example of institutionalized sexism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Your problem isn't with Star Trek, it's with last friggin' names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. No, it's with depicting a sexist society as utopian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 01:02 AM Response to Reply #65 |
74. My surname is my father's - not my mother's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 01:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. What on earth makes a surname inherently male? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Name-wise, they ARE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. So you contend that a person's name isn't part of their identity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
47. There is always a female character who wears shrink wrap. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMightyFavog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 06:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
66. Rand got Kirk's coffee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ivan Sputnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
23. I suppose you could say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
24. female drivers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
26. Wrong. Captain Rachel Garrett of the Enterprise-C. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. Same hairdo that Jane Jetson and Kathryn Janeway had! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 09:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
57. That's 24th century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
27. 1960's Misogyny prevented it being shown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
49. Wonder why no women were depicted in leadership roles in the 2009 movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
30. You do know that it was a tv show from 40 years ago, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. One of the (many) problems with creating a prequel series (ENT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
33. Need Retcon now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyLover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
34. In Star Trek IV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
37. Because TOS was made in the chauvanist 60s and TNG, Voyager and Enterprise weren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
39. IIRC, there were only 12 "starships", which seemed to be the Constitution-class ships |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
40. fukin capt janeway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. Love her. I like all the captains, actually. Except for on Enterprise, where Bakula was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:07 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Not me. I love Bakula too. I'll happily take all the ST you can throw at me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. I think the captains were all terrific. Sometimes they're the ONLY thing worth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. If someone could magically transport me into a TV/Movie world, I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
69. Didn't like her or the show at the start, but came to love 'em both. And then, there was 7 of 9. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
41. It's because women are givers of pain and delight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
42. It's because they change the seat adjustments and leave the side mirrors out of place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
44. They must have elected a Republican who moved everything backwards for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
45. Yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
58. Janice Lester was crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 06:58 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Kirk and Sisko weren't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #60 |
84. Sisko certainly *became* entertainingly crazy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-17-09 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
59. The lack of female starship captains was a direct result of the rise to power of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-18-09 07:47 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 02:16 AM Response to Reply #59 |
80. "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruised." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
71. Okay ST Dork, since we know Janeway existed, answer your own question and clue us in, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 12:51 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. What does Janeway have to do with rampant 23rd century Star Fleet sexism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 12:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. WE don't know and the request was that you fill us in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. If I knew, I wouldn't have posed a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 01:48 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. OIC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 02:09 AM Response to Reply #72 |
78. Nothing. Janeway was 24th Century Starfleet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 02:15 AM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-19-09 02:17 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. No problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC