|
Edited on Mon Mar-01-04 03:50 PM by TXlib
When I joined my company 18 months ago, their compensation plan was simple and generous... if the company met or exceeded its financial goals, your bonus was up to 100% of your base salary, and was averaging about 75% over the past several years.
Everybody, from the president to the janitor, got the same percentage of their salary as bonus. If your base was $20,000, and they decided to pay out a bonus of 50%, you got $10,000; if your base was $100,000, you got $50,000. By at least one objective standard, this scheme is fair.
We went fully corporate last year, and no longer were fully in control of our own policies, subservient to the larger corporation.
Despite being profitable, no bonus was paid because Corporate was upset at a large loss taken early in the year that was the result of senior management bungling -- the worker bees had done their jobs well, though.
Now, there's a new bonus structure - there's a large "shared pool" that everybody gets the same percentage from, adjusted for personal merit, and an executive pool, which senior management only drinks from.
To the extent that bonuses are withheld from the shared pool, the executive pool grows.
Anybody else see a conflict of interest here?!
Guess who's getting fucked in the ass AGAIN by senior management?
I can't see any objective point of view by which this scam, ah, I mean scheme, is fair.
Senior management has already joked about how the bad economy is keeping people at their jobs, and preventing them from bailing, just because they're happy to HAVE a job.
There is, in other words, little incentive for senior management to be fair about granting bonuses to rank and file employees.
:grr: :mad:
|