Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Masterpiece Theater

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:03 PM
Original message
Masterpiece Theater
Did anyone else watch Jane Austen's Persuasion tonight? I have become so sick and tired of television in the last year or so I decided to watch something worthwhile. It was beautifully done and I totally enjoyed it. Something like that doesn't come along very often anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Check out the next several weeks
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 11:18 PM by supernova
of you're a Jane Austen fan. :D

Persuasion followed by Northanger Abbey.

I recorded Jane Eyre and am watching that right now though. I'm saving Persuasion for later. ;-)

I agree that more classic literature needs to be on TV.

edit: PBS is running the entire Jane Austen oeuvre over the next couple of months. :D

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/?campaign=pbshomefeatures_1_masterpiecetheatrebrthecompletejaneausten_2008-01-13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Northanger Abbey? Is that just more liberal pro-abortion taxpayer funded propaganda
designed to make our children gay and vegetarian (that is, Communist)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nice post, Mr Darcy
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, and read E.M. Forster too!
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 11:17 PM by CBHagman
And you know how dangerous THAT is. ;-)

Anyway, behold the power of literary adaptations. Check out the Masterpiece Theatre classic series:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/schedule/index.html

There's Austen and much more.

The Complete Jane Austen website:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/austen/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sorry to say, but Billie Piper just didn't make it in Mansfield Park
Not really that surprising, but she can't act that far out of character. So I'd advise no-one to get their hopes up about that one.

I recommend "My Boy Jack" - the true story of Rudyard Kipling's son in the First World War; and if you're a fan of British actresses (and, to a lesser extent, actors), then 'Cranford', on in May on that schedule, is heaven - practically the entire British roster is in there somewhere. It was very popular in the UK back in December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. No, she can't but she was tolerable
in The Ruby in the Smoke. But, she was playing a teen/young adult again, so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. And also playing "lively, confident, knows she's pretty" in that
all of which are quite wrong for Fanny Price. They just showed the 1999 film of Mansfield Park in the UK this weekend - much more convincing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. At least they have the sense not to try to re-do P&P.
Why bother improving upon the perfection of the '95 version?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Heaven forfend!
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. It was really, really good, with fine acting all around...
...then they simply deleted most of the payoff, cutting Austen's most smokin'-hot lines to ribbons.

Anne is supposed to deliver the line about women loving longest "when all hope is gone" to Harville (not to Benwick, as this production had it, much earlier) in earshot of Wentworth, who leaves her a note no doubt singed around the edges from where the pen kept catching fire:

"I can listen no longer in silence. I must speak to you by such means as are within my reach. You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope. Tell me not that I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone for ever. I offer myself to you again with a heart even more your own than when you almost broke it, eight years and a half ago. Dare not say that man forgets sooner than woman, that his love has an earlier death. I have loved none but you. Unjust I may have been, weak and resentful I have been, but never inconstant. You alone have brought me to Bath. For you alone, I think and plan. Have you not seen this? Can you fail to have understood my wishes? I had not waited even these ten days, could I have read your feelings, as I think you must have penetrated mine. I can hardly write. I am every instant hearing something which overpowers me. You sink your voice, but I can distinguish the tones of that voice when they would be lost on others. Too good, too excellent creature! You do us justice, indeed. You do believe that there is true attachment and constancy among men. Believe it to be most fervent, most undeviating, in F. W.

"I must go, uncertain of my fate; but I shall return hither, or follow your party, as soon as possible. A word, a look, will be enough to decide whether I enter your father's house this evening or never."

Such a letter was not to be soon recovered from.


Anthony Head was marvelous as Sir Walter, and I give mad props to Hawkins and Penry-Jones in the leads. This production beat the hell out of the tedious 1971 version, and nearly matched the '95.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not only was it good...
It was followed by Bally Kissangel in our area. I'd never seen that show before. I thought it was very entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookworm65t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. God-awful version
This version had updated dialogue, plus famous lines from the book were said by characters other than the orginal character. A better version was the one made about ten years ago with Ciaran Hinds and Corin Redgrave as the snooty father. :mad:

And why remake Sense and Sensibilty anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because it's there.
As wonderful as Ang Lee's 1995 version of S&S was, I can understand the desire to create yet another interpretation of the novel. Few things are certain in this life but for death, taxes, and that someone will keep making new films of Bronte and Austen works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC