Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any Theoretical Physicists here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:55 PM
Original message
Any Theoretical Physicists here?
I'm really curious about these stories about the ultra high energy cosmic rays being emitted by black holes (according to the BBC).

Wouldn't this be rather unexpected, even if you take into account Hawking Radiation? Or are these rays Hawking Radiation?

Or is it misleading for the articles to state that the rays are "emitted" by black holes? I can imagine rays being sped up by black holes as they circumnavigate the event horizon, but if they are truly coming out of black holes, wouldn't that violate some central beliefs about black holes?

Is this as important a story as it sounds?

Comments would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you're misinterpreting the use of the word "emitted."
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 07:58 PM by Bornaginhooligan
They're not talking about hawking radiation.

Just Ohmygod particles coming from black holes.

Presumably regular particles that are accelerated by the "gravity slingshot." They never cross the event horizon.

I don't know why you'd think it important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I meant it would be important if they were coming
from within a black hole, since most people are taught that nothing can come out of a black hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But thanks for the clarification NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You are partially correct.
Certainly the cosmic rays in question do not cross the event horizon. Nor are they Hawking radiation.

But the mechanism of acceleration could not possibly be a "gravity slingshot". The gravity from a supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy would not accelerate a cosmic ray. The acceleration mechanism must involve matter that is orbiting the black hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Cosmic rays are matter.
Usually protons.

It's stuff that comes from the jets, presumably. Matter falls towards the black hole, forms an accretion disk, goes faster and faster, heats up, gets faster and faster, then gets spat out in jets. The exact mechanism of how jets work is unknown, but slingshoting is something lay persons understand, sort of.

That said, this article doesn't say any of this. They simple correlate ohmygod particles with specific points in the sky instead of broad distribution, those points correlate with the distribution of AGNs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Indeed they are.
But my point was that the cosmic rays (which are atomic nuclei) must be interacting with other matter in the vicinity of the black hole. More specifically, the interaction must be with electromagnetic fields generated by the other matter.

What is observed on the ground is a shower of secondary particles resulting from the impact of the primary cosmic ray on the upper atmosphere. The geometry of the measurements indicates the approximate direction of the primary cosmic ray. The correlation of these directions with known active galactic nuclei is evidence that supermassive black holes are involved.

As you said, the exact mechanism of acceleration is unknown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you mean gamma ray bursts or something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Something else.
High energy cosmic rays, dubbed "ohmygod" particles. Protons travelling so fast they carry the kinetic energy of a Nolan Ryan fastball.

A recent Science paper correlated them with supermassive blackholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why that name?
Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Cool. I am looking them up on wikipedia even now.
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 08:48 PM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. No wonder non-scientists are so afraid of physicists NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I see Lounge standards are slipping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. The way I was taught ... it's quantum mechanics writ large
The only time the micro and macro scale resemble each other is at an event horizon. So, while no matter can leave the gravity well of the central mass ... the probability is not 0 and the resulting radiation is predictable. Miniscule in comparison to the energy consumed - and the part that should twist your noodle is where all that energy goes, but I have my own equations - the escaping particles have enough energy to radiate this far, however long it takes.

Particles ... again, you gotta take the macro scale. Black holes eat planets, even suns around 'em and something spills, so to speak.

The rest is math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC