Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this remark racially insensitive?:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:08 PM
Original message
Is this remark racially insensitive?:
I wrote a paper for philosophy class, and I have this sentance in it, which, after rereading, comes off as kind of racist (It's not intended to be that way). I am discussing the act of "bearing witness", which is when a member of an advantaged group speaks out on behalf of a disadvantaged group (example- White supporters of the civil rights movement). Do you think I should change it? It's:

"White supporters of the civil rights movement often added credibility to the racially charged topic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. which philosophy class?
what is the topic of the paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Ethics & morality, the topic is Laurence Thomas's "Bearing witness"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know if it's inherently racist, but...
it does not sound right...if you know what I mean. It sounds kinda like the civil rights movement wouldn't be credible sans whitey. I would qualify it or expand it some, if I were you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. What you're trying to say is
That having white folks involved made it harder for other white folks to dismiss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. exactly!
Many whites saw it as a Black Vs. White issue, by having whites stand on the side of the african american community, it made other whites re-evaluate the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Explain in whose eyes
credibility was raised and you should be alright:

ex: "White supporters of the civil rights movement often added credibility for millions of other white Americans who had yet to take sides."

Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. good fix
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. i would add the phrase: to other whites
otherwise it sounds like you are using white as normative. as though the only credibility that counts is the credibility of white folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd change it
It sounds like the movement lacked credibility without white supporters.
That's not true.
How about using the word "visibility" instead of credibility? Or perhaps rewrite it so that the meaning is that white people woke up because a white person, someone they idenitified with, spoke up.

Good luck on your paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Caucasian
would work better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes.
Because you imply that whiteness = more credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, you should change it
I know what you mean but it's not expressed well. Perhaps something like, "White supporters of the civil rights movement often caused other whites to take a more objective look at the issue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. or something like "the participation by whites in the movement led to increased visibility and
broader support"

Also, this may have been fairly late in the movement, but some white musicians (and probably other celebrity-types) participated in some of the marches and this probably helped increase white support as well
We have 2 Peter Paul and Mary tapes for kids ("Peter, Paul and Mommy" and "Peter, Paul and Mommy Too"), and on one of them there is an incredibly moving track of "We Shall Overcome" with kids singing along that always brings tearrs to my eyes. In the intro to the song, they say something like "we sang this song with Martin Luther King, and now we'd like you to sing it with us"
(for those of you parents that hate all the sappy, crappy kids music out there, those two are real gems - we played the first one so much we wore it out and had to buy a new copy!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC