New Rule: Cities with palm trees can not have NHL teams.

[ohiosmith]

[jakefrep]

1. I agree

Hockey south of the Mason-dixon line is an abomination unto the Lord (Leviticus 36:24-36).

[huskerlaw]

2. ...

:nopity:



:woohoo:

[Left Is Write]

3. That should have been the rule all along.

Another rule should have been: NO NHL teams shall go from MINNESOTA to TEXAS. It's just wrong. (Any other North Stars fans around here?)

[KamaAina]

5. Nor from New England to the Carolinas

what do those jerks think they are, a runaway non-union textile mill in the 1920s?

[WilliamPitt]

4. Better idea

Cities where ice does not form naturally in winter should buy soccer teams instead.

[KamaAina]

6. Agreed, with one exception: New Orleans.

Palm trees, yes -- but the city was founded in 1718 by Bienville, who grew up in Lower Canada (now Quebec). Any city founded by a Quebecois can have hockey, sweltering climate or no.

Naturally, they're one of two warm-weather cities I can think of that doesn't: Houston is the other.

[PVnRT]

7. New Rule: Toronto sucks

muahahahahahahahahahahahah Go Red Wings