|
Paris Whitney Hilton is an American celebritard and social disease. She is an heiress to a share of an obscene amount of money, which she could not possibly count even if she had six fingers and toes on each extremity--and thanks to medical science---she doesn't. She provides hope to stupid people who watch a goddamn amount of t.v. that they, too, could lead a life so utterly f'ing protected that they never have to personally deal with any...well...personal shit.
Hilton is notable for her roles as a paid party favor and frequently downloaded mediocre pornstress. In addition to her work as a breathing potentially sentient being, she sometimes stars in stuff dumb people watch. She can wear clothes and it is rumored she can dress herself. To the extent that she can speak--she has spokesmodulated.
As most of America who tunes into such ephemeric crap has had data-dumped into their precious human consciousness recognizes, Paris Hilton was charged with a DUI in a Los Angeles court and sentenced to wile away 45 days doing nothing in a very small and not terribly luxurious place.
We, the American public who have not been brain-washed into thinking this piece of meat has more rights than any of us other meat puppets, express delight in the notion of her actually serving time for the crime of driving while negligently stupid and liable to kill somebody. Because she was both stupid and negligent, and totally liable to kill somebody, irrespective of either the beauty conveyed by genetic lottery and fortunate medical intervention, or of status bestowed by wealth and fame, or sheer "folks-give-a-crap"--we actually ask for a sentence extension. Until such time as the accused, indicted and convicted, Paris Hilton is no longer of child-bearing age, it may be prudent for the court to demand a sure incarceration, to avoid the greater damage that may be done, if one citizen Paris Hilton should reproduce.
Much thought has been given in this plea. If just plain folks with the wrong name, residency status and ethnicity, can be thrown into Guantanamo for suspected faults, and held indefinitely, how much more appropriate would it be to hold a known goofball, whose goofiness will only grow more pernicious every day? And should she bear offspring, would they not be equally celebritards, reckless and unanswerable to regular society, and liable to commit murders and reality programs?
I think any court or sentencing judge or appellate court could well consider the justice of which I write, and find a shred of vague agreeance.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
