Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life in the 1500's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:36 PM
Original message
Life in the 1500's
I just got this email,so it must be true.

LIFE IN THE 1500'S
The next time you are washing your hands and complain because the water temperature isn't just how you like it, think about how things used to be. Here are some facts about the 1500's:

Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in May, and still smelled pretty good by June. However, they were starting to smell, so brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.

Baths consisted of a big tub filled with hot water. The man of the house had the privilege of the nice clean water, then all the
other sons and men, then the women and finally the children. Last of all the babies. By then the water was so dirty you could actually lose someone in it. Hence the saying, don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

Houses had thatched roofs-thick straw-piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so all the cats and other small animals (mice, bugs) lived in the roof when it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying . It's raining cats and dogs.

There was nothing to stop things from falling into the house. This posed a real problem in the bedroom where bugs and other droppings could mess up your nice clean bed. Hence, a bed with big posts and a sheet hung over the top afforded some protection. That's how canopy beds came into existence.

The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt. Hence the saying, dirt poor. The wealthy had slate floors that would get slippery in the winter when wet, so they spread thresh (straw) on floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on, they added more thresh until, when you opened the door, it would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed in the entranceway. Hence the saying a thresh hold.

In those old days, they cooked in the kitchen with a big kettle that always hung over the fire. Every day they lit the fire and added things to the pot. They ate mostly vegetables and did not get much meat. They would eat the stew for dinner, leaving leftovers in the pot to get cold overnight and then start over the next day. Sometimes stew had food in it that had been there for quite a while. Hence the rhyme, peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold, peas porridge in the pot nine days old.

Sometimes they could obtain pork, which made them feel quite special. When visitors came over, they would hang up their bacon to show off. It was a sign of wealth that a man could, bring home the bacon. They would cut off a little to share with guests and would all sit around and chew the fat.

Those with money had plates made of pewter. Food with high acid content caused some of the lead to leach onto the food, causing lead poisoning death. This happened most often with tomatoes, so for the next 400 years or so, tomatoes were considered poisonous.

Bread was divided according to status. Workers got the burnt bottom of the loaf, the family got the middle, and guests got the top, or the upper crust.

Lead cups were used to drink ale or whisky. The combination would sometimes knock the imbibers out for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would take them for dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up.
Hence the custom of holding a wake.

England is old and small and the local folks started running out of places to bury people. So they would dig up coffins and would take the bones to a bone-house, and reuse the grave. When reopening these coffins, 1 out of 25 coffins were found to have scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying people alive. So they would tie a string on the
wrist of the corpse, lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it to a bell. Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift.) to listen for the bell; thus, someone could be saved by the bell or was considered a dead ringer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. fascinating, just from a language standpoint
thanks for posting it...just shows every idiom has a root somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. So much for the good old days.
I work the graveyard shift.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is really interesting, Swede.

I love to find the origins of expressions/words.

Thanks for sharing this.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some book I read last summer
had a lot of that in it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting, but I don't think the explanation about "dead ringer"
is correct.

A "dead ringer" is someone who has an uncanny resemblence to someone else. I think the term comes from the game of horseshoes, and refers to a "ringer" (pitched horseshoe that encircles the stake) that is like the opponent's ringer-- two pitches that are essentially alike, that cancel each other out (thus, "dead").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edwin Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hate to spoil the party, but:
www.snopes.com/language/phrases/1500.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nice catch!
You sure did spoil the party though. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Some other thoughts on early marriages
Much depends upon what is meant by marriage. The contract or agreement to marry was in the eyes of both church and state legally binding. The couple were bound to one another and among the nobility and royals it was often done when they were very young, even infants. The alliance was locked as soon as possible and this had everything to do with family and national alliances. Neither could contract with anyone else so long as the contract existed. To do so would be illegal and render any other marriage bigamous. As pointed out the couple wouldn't consummate the marriage until they were considered physically able to do so and the young woman able to bear healthy children, mid teens at least. Margaret Beaufort was the exception, not the rule.

Among the other classes normally men did not marry until they had established themselves, ie had a profession, a skilled trade, land or some way to support a family. Apprentices, for example, were forbidden to marry until they had completed their training and certified skilled in their trade. To do so would terminate their apprenticeship. Skilled tradesmen would be in their late teens or early twenties when they were certified.

An overview of English records of the time shows the average age of married first time parents (other than royals and high nobility) was early to mid twenties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. So this WAS past the point where someone said "Maybe putting the dead bodies in the drinking water..
..isn't such a good idea"

Thanks for the info.

"Oh here comes the king"
"How do you know he is the king?"
"He isn't covered in shit"
---Monte Python
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sorry to throw cold water on this, but it's a load of bunk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC