Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rhetorical question: Why must some people rain on parades?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:58 AM
Original message
Rhetorical question: Why must some people rain on parades?
I know there is no answer to this, but it's hitting me in the gut this week. My congregation is formally ordaining me at the end of March so the printed invitations went out last week. The response has been mostly affirmative and congratulatory. But two individuals have taken it upon themselves to piss on the proceedings. One is a lay person who is a total whack job and her efforts to sabotage the ordination were deflated instantly.

Another is a minister who does not approve of the unconventional, albeit perfectly legitimate, preparation track taken by me and the congregation. So I won't be a "real" UU minister and she "cannot support the ordination."

*sigh*

I don't recall the invitation requesting anyone's support for a binding and legitimate decision already made by a congregation within a denomination ostensibly governed by congregational polity. The irony is that I met this minister ten years ago when she was first starting out. I was the only one on our search committee who argued on her behalf. She has no clue of this of course. She also can't spell my name right even though she's seen it in print.

Oh well, I do understand the concerns for wanting to maintain quality in the ministry. I also sympathize with professionals who erroneously perceive others are taking short cuts and coming in "the easy way."

But the layperson whack job? MEAN PEOPLE SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!

So now that you've waded through my rant. Tell me about a time someone rained on your parade and you didn't let it get to you. I want to see some success stories. Lay it on me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember This:
Nobody shoots at you on the way down. A dear friend told me this, and it's true. So just be concerned when no one wants to piss in your Wheaties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't think of any fight at the moment
but reply 1 is pretty solid.

But, yeah, some people just can't resist being a pain in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. jealousy mostly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is a fear-based society. Don't be suprised at fear-based behaviour.
Congratulations on your course.

And post 1? People don't shoot you on the way down? People set the homeless on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't Think He Meant It That Literally
But who's lower - the homeless person, or the scum trying to harm him? If you wanted to get all philosophical, you could even see the homeless person on his way up by being so detached from material goods.

But the quote was in reference to people "gunning for you" in the figurative sense, not in the setting homeless people on fire sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, I get serious and people cringe.
That's just the way of it. It goes that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Jealousy, envy, indignation, resentment
Some people just HATE to see someone else get something that either (1)they don't have, or (2)they have, but had to work harder/sacrifice more for. You seem the same mentality in conservatives every time welfare is mentioned. It's good that you can shrug it off and move on--no point in being upset when there's nothing you can do to change things. :hug: Congrats, by the way!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. I work with someone who is referred to as
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 10:27 AM by dropkickpa
"Funsucker". Not one situation will happen where she does not feel the need to piss on someone's wheaties. For instance, one girl we work with recently started dating someone and told us "I really like him! We have a lot in common and he treats me good!". Funsucker's reponse? "He'll probably turn out to be a sicko or axe-murderer of some sort." :wtf: Nothing good or positive can happen for someone without her shitting on it, up to and included stirring up pointless conflict.

Anymore, we just say to eat other "Funsucker" and go on our way, ignoring her debbie downer efforts, and we are happier. And, because we don't react to her funsuckerism as much, it seems to be letting up a bit.

Congratulations and I hope the ordination and festivities are fantastic for you! (you're gonna have a party to celebrate after, right?):party: :toast: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I work with someone like that, too.
The whole damn world is out to get her, don't you know it? :eyes: I like "funsucker" as a nickname, though... might have to borrow that one! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh yes, definitely having a party.
Hmmm... "Funsucker" sounds exactly like a young woman had the displeasure of rooming with for a year in college. The glass wasn't just half empty it had a chip in the rim that would slice your lips open and make you bleed to death. I haven't thought of her in years. Probably a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's a great term to use for somebody like that--Funsucker! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep! It perfectly describes what she does. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. We laughed at this because it was so petty, but
my mother volunteered at a food pantry for many years. She was a generous soul and forgiving of most human frailties, but she did shoot off her mouth when a wet behind-the-ears young volunteer coordinator came in and tried to explain things to the senior citizens as if they were all addle-brained. Before her final illness she decided to take a break from volunteering because she wanted to wait out the arrogant young coordinator's one year stint. When she died after a brief illness, we received a condolence note from the center penned by the young coordinator and he felt the need to qualify the condolences by saying the staff and volunteers had many memories of her, "most of them good times but some difficult times too." Classy, no?

We enjoyed a hearty laugh because it validated everything our mother had said about him, and we agreed that he was fortunate that we weren't as petty as he was because the food pantry was our designated charity in lieu of flowers -- one call to the director and the little twit would have been in deep trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Gotta share this with yall.
I have a co-worker who does this. He's single, not in a relationship and he'd very much like to be (not with me; I'm old enough to be his parent). Anyway, every time I mention a man, he'll say, "He's married." or "He's engaged." I almost think he'd say that if I mentioned GWB, he'd say, "He's married." :silly:

One day I'd had it, and when he said of a man I'd mentioned (whom we hadn't had as a customer for several years, and he's almost young enough to be my son), "He's engaged," and I responded, "Misery loves company, doesn't it, Joe?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC