Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just Saw "Dead Poets Society" -- Didn't Like it Too Much

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:54 PM
Original message
Just Saw "Dead Poets Society" -- Didn't Like it Too Much
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 12:56 PM by liberalpragmatist
WARNING: PLOT SPOILERS

I believe I'm in the minority on this one. Most people I know love this movie, and I've read reviews on Amazon.com that seem the same way.

I like the movie. It is engaging and somewhat touching. But I feel that it's overrated and that many elements in the story aren't sufficiently developed. Robin William's Mr. Keating isn't even in the story much, for he's limited mostly to the background, confined to just a few scenes. The students don't actually gain any wisdom about poetry. They just learn the phrase "carpe diem" and learn to be free-thinkers. But there's no real wisdom they learn from the poems, no love of poetry.

The story also picks up what could be an interesting exchange when it has a short dialogue between Keating and another teacher who's sympathetic to Keating but disagrees with the idea that teenagers can be good free-thinkers. Had this been developed more and carried throughout the movie, it could have been excellent, but it's just dropped.

The romance between one boy and the girl of his dreams is juvenile and nauseating. Plus, it distracts from the rest of the story and ends abruptly without resolution.

What actually annoyed me most was the climax of the story. The suicide of Neal Perry was shocking and dramatic, but it felt like it never had much development. We realized that Neal felt stifled by his father and we understood that he was unhappy, but the script, I felt, never really developed the fact that Neal was suicidal. What's more, the suicide wasn't really necessary b/c it mudied the film's message. Though it intended to show how stifling a person's freewill could be destructive, it simultaneously seemed to prove the pt that young persons were not able to be free thinkers. Had this been the primary strand in the story, it could have been more affective, but it just seemed calculated to make people sad and create conflict.

The film could either have dropped the suicide and dealt with Neal overcoming his father's opposition, and, in doing so, being more consistent in message, or it could have developed Neal's unhappiness and suicidal nature and his relationship with his father more to make the suicide more effective. The film seemed unfocused in its message and inconsistent. Nobody else seemed to agree with me :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frogfromthenorth2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. MOST OVERATED MOVIE EVER imo.....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. i din't like it neither
... i remember noting it on films i don't want to see again.

Robin william's emotional nature turns me off... i liked him better high on coke in mork and mindy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. stay away from any Williams movie...
with the exception of "Moscow on the Hudson" and maybe "The Survivors"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. That movie sucked ass...
One of the absolute worst movies I've ever seen! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogfromthenorth2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. You see... You are not alone...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I saw it in 1989 and loved it.

Not sure what I'd think of it now, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree with you.
Seemed like the most awful wishy-washy waffle to me. Plus, most of the characters were one-deminsional and Williams' character was just nauseating (as is often the case)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC