Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "Marriage Killing Side Effects of Breastfeeding", by a ManO'God:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:13 AM
Original message
The "Marriage Killing Side Effects of Breastfeeding", by a ManO'God:
My favorite quotes:

"Obviously, breast-feeding is not the same as carrying on an extramarital affair. But when a mother gives her breasts to her son and takes them away from her husband, the effect on the marriage can feel the same.

"In the end, there are two effects of breast-feeding that we often refuse to acknowledge. One is the de-eroticization of a woman's body, as her husband witnesses one of the most attractive parts of her body serving a utilitarian rather than romantic purpose...public breast-feeding is profoundly de-eroticizing, and I believe that wives should cover up, even when they nurse their babies in their husband's presence.

"I believe this same problem comes up when men witness childbirth up close. There are certain poses in which a husband should not see his wife...That is just too erotic a part of a wife's anatomy for it to become a mere birth canal."


More here:
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/194/story_19451_1.html

Have at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know where to begin.
Uh...um...Yay, breasts!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. i guess women should never watch men pee, then? (ewwww)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Haha! Good one!
:rofl:

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. You're being far too logical! :) Apparently women are only to be seen
as sexual objects?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #41
66. That's what it sounds like to me!
"De-eroticising" the woman's body???? Hey, moran, feeding a baby is the primary purpose of breasts! They're NOT made for men's entertainment. The same goes for the birth canal.

Holy crap. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
68. For the record, I don't want ANYONE to watch me pee.
And I sure as hell don't want to watch anyone pee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oy vay
I am gobsmacked...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
55. Gobsmacked: Reaction when confronted with heretofore unimagined,
monumental stupidity.

Great word! :rofl:

Imagine my surprised embarrassment to find it is a real word. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #55
69. an etymology of gobsmacked:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. These people
really have a fixation problem. :wtf: :banghead: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. these guys are perverts
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:16 AM by tocqueville
they should all be sent to a psychiatrist. They really are sick bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. OMG
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:18 AM by alcibiades_mystery
I'm absolutely blown away by this. What an utterly sick argument. What the fuck is wrong with these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh fo r %^%$8* sake
Then men need to grow the heck up. So marriage is not about partenership it's about making sure men don't feel abandoned and disgusted?

OK - I am now sure I live in the twilight zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
94. And these are the men running the country, folks.
Ain't it grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Okay, so he's saying men deserve more coddling than thier babies?
Let's clear this up. My breasts are *mine.* They fed my kid and men sure don't seem to mind them, but they belong to me, they belonged to me when I was lactating, they belong to me when I'm getting some. Mine. Any guy who has a problem with that doesn't get to see 'em and damned sure won't be reproducing with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Sublimely succinct post, LefttMom. My hubs waould beam at
me & the babies and say "Now THAT is a miracle".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoyCat Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
79. Women like you make me proud to be a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. What kind of crazy lunatic thinking is that?
Nah, it is not taking the breast from that man and giving it to the son that hurts a marriage once a child is born. If the man is insecure to begin with, he'll resent everything about the baby. I remember my husbands complaint after our son was born.. it was the lack of attention he was getting. I'm not talking about sex. It was the re-focusing of my energy on sustaining the life we brought into the world. Sustaining, caring and supporting him became secondary and he resented the hell out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's all about a woman and her body being solely for a man's pleasure.
Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. This guy has forgotten the cardinal rule of marriage
IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT HIS NEEDS!!

He needs to seriously get over himself and grow the hell up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Stupid bastards like this should just stick to Penthouse and
masturbation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. He's reinvented Madonna/Whore complex. Now it is the
Madonna/Whore/Bovine mammal complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. are you sure this isn't a dry run for "The Onion?"
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Men can't have constant unfettered access to their wives' bodies?
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:22 AM by Fierce
Boo fuckin' hoo.

Also, "mere" birth canal.

This man is sick and not even worth the time for a word-by-word thrashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know what happened here, first it told me I couldn't
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:25 AM by acmavm
post because I had a link or something open. So I tried it again and I see my original message has been posted.

See folks, this is what happens when you have insomnia and stay up all night then go to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. For me, ignorant articles like this, de-eroticize men's bodies.
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:29 AM by Fridays Child
This man, Shmuley Boteach, has some major issues that he needs to deal with.

Edited to add: This guy has a TV show? Fucking unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. conservative christians CANNOT stop thinking about
penises and vaginas -- especially other peoples penises and vaginas.

all the time -- every second of every day -- they think about your boobies and your dick.

worse -- they have an opinion about your boobies -- your dick .

and as evidenced by this perverts opinion -- it gets worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. I'm pretty sure this guy is not christian but I agree...
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:32 AM by Fridays Child
...conservative part of your observation. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. weird isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. Conservative Jew
And I mean that in the religious sense (as in: Reform Jew, Conservative Jew, Orthodox Jew.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
93. I think he's Orthodox nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. Real men aren't squeemish
Wonder if he's worried about cooties, too? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. My sister told me that when she was breastfeeding the new baby boy
and her other little boy who was just a year old had his hand on his mother's breast for comfort, her husband said, "Hey, all the men in this house like your breasts." She loved it, and he sure didn't feel abandoned because she was breastfeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritingIsMyReligion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. All forbid a man should ever see his wife as anything other than a bastion
of sexuality.

:eyes:

Dude, the reason a breast is there--the primary. fucking. reason.--is to feed a child.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
62. Gee, I thought they were to give us something to stare at when we talk to
y'all. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
21. Guys out there...what do you honestly think about this?
I have heard about this ideology before but never from a "man of god". I'm curious what men think about what he's saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. I think he's full of baloney myself.
being with my wife while she was pregnant, giving birth and (attempting) breast feeding was the most romantic thing ever, and humbled me to know I was part of my family. I didn't feel a difference in how attracted I was to her sexually, but I did find an INCREASE in how attracted I was to her as a person, and as my life partner, and as the mother of my precious child.
I knew it wasn't about me initially, so I didn't worry about it. As it turned out, she couldn't nurse, and we bottle-fed, and that was even better for me because I got to share in the feeding and bonding with my son.

but bottom line: any husband who is thinking about THEIR sexual needs over the needs of his offspring and his wife has messed up priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
46. First, An Admission:
I'm not a "Breast Man." Never quite understood the whole American obsession with big breasts.
Second, I spent a lot of my childhood overseas in poorer countries - so I knew the primary use for breasts before I ever started reacting to them as sexual objects.
Third, I reached emotional maturity about the same time as I reached sexual maturity - it has been a long time since I equated someone paying attention to someone else as ignoring me. I understand the concept that it is possible for someone to love multiple people in multiple, different ways. I don't require that I be the center of attention all the time.
So, my conclusion? Yes, some immature, emotionally retarded men feel this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #46
60. Wow. Both of you who answered my question make me
proud to be part of DU. Thank you for giving this girl who's pondering motherhood for the first time a real man's perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickoutthejams23 Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
65. It would never occur to me to object.
Or to put it in guy talk.... Hey any excuse to pull out the puppies is fine by me. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
82. Absolute Nonsense
It's indicative of a "man owning his wife" mentality. I suppose there are some women out there that want to be "owned," but I sure as hell wouldn't want to marry one. If all I wanted was a sex object, I would rent one.

I have a two week old daughter right now. She's our third child. She is, of course, breast feeding. Also, I not only witnessed her birth, I got to remove her from the "birth canal" (after the Midwife made sure there were no umbilical cord around the neck issues) and place her on her Mom's chest. It's a good thing...........

We will, naturally, resume where we left off in the passion department, but for cryin' out loud, you gotta let the woman heal up.....

You know, if you haven't been with a woman long enough to ease up a bit with the pneumatics when appropriate, you haven't been with her long enough to have kids......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
24. What a putz! What a goniff! What a schmuck!
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:33 AM by MrModerate
Let me put a little lesson together since this guy thinks of himself as a teacher:

Having children is not trivial. It changes your life. You have to adapt to the needs of the child in ways you never imagined. If you're not an absolute moron, you'll work out ways to accommodate the needs and desires of all family members in some balanced fashion. Balance is key -- one family member (in this case the husband) is not the king, and trying to achieve balance while affording the husband some sort of kingly primacy will not work. Most people are able to modify their behavior based on context. Sometimes a breast is a breast, sometimes it's a feeding station. Sometimes a birth canal is a birth canal, sometimes it's something else entirely (please add imagination here).

Grownups make these contextual distinctions all the time -- have for the last few hundred thousand years or more, without the intervention of holier-than-thou twits like the author of this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Its On TLC
Which used to stand for "The Learning Channel." Its become so overloaded with home improvement shows I don't even have it on my favorites list any more.
My wife watched this guy's show a couple of times ("Shalom In The Home") until I showed her his article railing against Jews who didn't support Israel during the Lebannon invasion. Didn't even bother showing her his article railing against Jews who didn't vote for Lieberman. She's a major proponent of breastfeeding (one of the things I love about her - I still don't eat Nestle's) so I wonder if I should show this one to her? She may go ballistic on TLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Um, I kinda think my wife is damn sexy when she breastfeeds.
But I always think my wife is damn sexy. Hell, that little post birth pot belly makes me randy every time I see it. Of course, I always get that way when I see her. Perhaps that's why I married her.

Oh, and that guy is a moron. I was there the whole time my son was born. I wouldn't have missed that for anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
61. That's what my husband says
And he was there for the birth too.....hasn't turned him off in the least (believe me!).

(He's even a *gasp!* republican!)

What is WRONG with this guy? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
28. Luckily I painted the walls semi-gloss, it will help me scrape my
brains back in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. Wow.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Wait, this isn't satire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. He said
"That is just too erotic a part of a wife's anatomy for it to become a mere birth canal."

How the hell does he think it became a mere birth canal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m_welby Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
32. I don't understand his point

breastfeeding is not erotic? that's true I do not find it erotic at all. It is however quite beautiful and uplifting in an indescribable way.

Watching someone give birth is not erotic? yep, I gotta agree with that, when I saw my kids born that was the last thing on my mind. Also an incredibly beautiful and joyful thing though.

umm, because I've seen my wife do these things am i scarred for life or something?

Not as far as I can tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. A wife breastfeeding is great for a husband, here is why.
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 09:44 AM by newportdadde
My wife breastfed our toddler until he was 9 months and is breastfeeding our twin 6 month old sons. Here are some reasons why its great for a husband.

1) On the go always available food. No bottle worries etc, it was important with our son but extremly important with twins. Nothing like two babies crying in stereo waiting for a bottle.

2) It is SOOOOOOO Much cheaper. We save a fortune having my wife breastfeed our twins, it would cost us an arm and a leg via formula, I think we did the math and it was like a couple grand.

3) All of the immunities passed on, I think it really helps keep a child healthy when they are small.

4) Selfish reason here - because my wife was breastfeeding she got up with the twins in the middle of the night, she could let them latch on and let them eat. I got a hell of a lot more sleep then if we had been bottle feeding.

5) Selfish reason here - visually at least my wife has much much larger breasts, I'm not a 'breast man' but its definately very visual. Now they are pretty much out of physical play given they are full of milk lol, but watching a former B cup walk around in a tight t-shirt with Ds is interesting.

I think this guy needs to lighten up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. I've got to agree with your 4 & 5!
Especially 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. actually I gotta disagree with #4.
my wife could not breastfeed, so we bottle-fed, equally splitting the duties. Since I stay up later, I covered the first half of the night, and since she got up earlier, she covered the second half.
It was a great relaxing bonding experience for me as a dad that I would have completely missed out on if she could have breastfed. I wouldn't have missed that for all the money in the world.

there is nothing more comforting in the world than rocking a baby with a bottle, for a dad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. Well, I've got my chore. I'm the only one who can get him to sleep.
Every night I rock him for two hours until he passes out, while my wife hangs out with me. Everyone's family and kids are different. As long as you bond together, it's all good.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
36. the part that especially kills me
"Obviously, breast-feeding is not the same as carrying on an extramarital affair. But when a mother gives her breasts to her son and takes them away from her husband, the effect on the marriage can feel the same.

He is clearly stating that nursing a baby boy is a form of sexual betrayal. How does an adult man come up with such a creepy notion? Could it be he finds himself gazing off into space while entertaining naughty thoughts about his own mother's breasts? These crazed moralists are usually revealing their personal obsessions when they come up with this kind of shit. It's probably his own incestuous urges that make him want to stamp out breastfeeding.

My husband thought it was cool that I breastfed our sons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
56. And I loved how baby girls just don't exist...
or they don't count or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. This guy needs to marry a blow up doll
Heaven forbid my life should have a bigger purpose then being an erotic plaything for a man. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddhaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
39. that was nauseating!!!!!
Let him know what you think!

http://www.shmuley.com/contact.php :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
42. Are these quotes from Americans?
Where does this crap come from? Is it the baby food industry that wants women to have to be responsible for uneducated people's comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. What if a woman gives her breasts to her baby daughter?
Is she homo-eroticized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldSiouxWarrior Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
45. Bullbleep !!
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 10:10 AM by OldSiouxWarrior
I was present for the delivery and it was a wonderful experience.

My wife breast fed the baby. It was beautiful to watch the joy.

It did not make her less sexy at all.

A man that would be turned off by that is less of a man. Yeah, that's a judgemental statement - so what? I can be real judgemental at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
48. Have I got this right?
So lemme get this straight. These wackos have said time and again that the only valid reason for having sex is to create babies.

But apparently it is a major turnoff for men when they see a woman’s vagina and breasts involved in the birth and caring for said babies. Therefore men should not be present when their wives are giving birth and if a woman absolutely must breastfeed she needs to do it out of her husband’s sight otherwise he might get so grossed out that he will no longer find her vagina and breasts the sexual turn-on that he once did.

Sooo, I guess this means that while babies should be the primary goal for Fundie WOMEN, for Fundie guys the primary goal is getting their rocks off and nothing involving birth and babies had better get in the way of that even though birth and babies would be the whole point of getting said rocks off in the first place. Or something like that. I don't know, I'm still confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Actually, This Guy Is A Conservative Jew
So he thinks sex for the sake of sex is okay. As long as the man's needs are paramount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
49. When I was breastfeeding, my husband got up every night...
brought the baby to me for feeding, then changed her diaper and
put her back to bed.

It was (and the whole child-rearing years were, too) a joint effort.

Take that, Shalom guy, you ignorant, worthless fucktard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #49
71. That's a wonderful way to split the responsibilities!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
51. This ****HAS**** to be a joke
Come on. It has to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
52. puke on the manOgod
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
53. So explain to me how colonial people had so many children?
After all, the only method of feeding babies that they had was to breastfeed. Didn't seem to stop those horny colonials, though. Perhaps they were more manly men back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
54. Dr. Freud would have a field day with this.
Or maybe he would be scared away. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
57. Oh PLEASE tell me this is a joke!!!
Otherwise, whoever wrote it is WARPED!!! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
58. schmuely and michael jackson
Rabbi Schmuley Boteach was a premier Michael Jackson apologist when Jacko was going through his "troubles." Yep, sickety sick sick SICK!

http://www.shmuley.com/articles.php?id=193

"... Four years ago, Michael Jackson and I produced approximately 30 hours of taped conversations intended as the basis of a book that would reveal his true self, the nature of his relationship with children, and his insights on various aspects of life, including love, spirituality, history, religion, and G-d.

"Michael asked me to write the book because we were close friends at the time and I was an experienced writer who could help him frame his authentic concerns and use his celebrity for a positive end. ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
59. I have found Elvis Presley, and he is a rabbi
"In the end, there are two effects of breast-feeding that we often refuse to acknowledge. One is the de-eroticization of a woman's body, as her husband witnesses one of the most attractive parts of her body serving a utilitarian rather than romantic purpose. This is not to say that breast-feeding isn't sexy. Indeed, the maternal dimension is a central part of womanliness. But public breast-feeding is profoundly de-eroticizing, and I believe that wives should cover up, even when they nurse their babies in their husband's presence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieNixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
63. Right, because if I ever have kids, I'll be jealous of my infant son
sucking my wife's boob. :eyes:

I guess if these guys ever have daughters who breastfeed they get out the camera and make a lesbian porn tape. x(

The "fun bits" of the body also serve utiliarian purpose...peeing, anyone? Gimme a break. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #63
89. Is Schmuley jealous, or grossed out?
Was he breastfed? Someone, quick--interview his Mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
64. You should have mentioned it was Shumley
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 11:17 AM by GoneOffShore
He is such a smacked ass.

My conserodox rabbi brother in law has dealt with him and found that he's a blow hard idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. He's been on Oprah. Man, I'm so stunned.
I can't believe this is the same guy. How horrible. On the episode I've seen him on he made a lot of sense.

I've also read the part about giving birth. I don't know if I could ever have anyone watch me anyway, because I'm very shy, but wow. I thought he was a good guy but he sounds like a lunatic

"I told the mother that in being so devoted to her son, she had committed the cardinal sin of marriage, which is to put someone else before her spouse, even if that someone is your child. Furthermore, I said, her obsession had turned one of her most attractive body parts into a feeding station, an attractive cafeteria rather than a scintillating piece of flesh."

This is just sick, sick, sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. "put somebody else before her spouse"?
I'm six foot, over 200 pounds (nevermind just how much, thank you) & am quite capable of feeding myself (I make a killer steak au poivre by the way.) The little, pink, hairless thing who could barely hold his head up needed someone to put his needs first. Has nothing to do with marriage - and everything to do with being parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. I know.
That sounds really pathological to me. It's scary, because like I said I heard this man speak on Oprah the other day and he actually seemed to help this family alot that was struggling with their own issues...but this stuff and the child-bearing stuff is just horrible anti-child propaganda. I think child-bearing is gross (all parts not related to the actual child, anyway) and I would be self-conscious about going through the process...but I would hope it would not ruin my sex life. I have a weak stomach and since I've had sexual relationships with women I don't know if that would 'traumatize' me or not seeing it. Probably not because I'm female but maybe for men the otherness is a factor...who knows.

This guy just has a horrible take on things when it comes to children. I'm not saying he isn't telling some men's truths...it probably doesn't hurt for some people to be able to express their feelings, I guess. But feelings are to be worked through, not to alter the whole course of the life and health of a child over. I mean if it is someone's truth isn't there a way to say "I respect and honor your feelings of envy, possessiveness, whatever, but you have to understand the child's well-being trumps what your adult reaction to it is". So, yeah, in essence, what you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
90. His website is rather inadvertently funny.
So at least he's got THAT going for him.

He repeats this gem more than once: "The man who has a woman who believes in him is impregnable and invincible. Nothing in life can hurt him because he has peace at this center."


Impregnable man? Interesting choice of words, Schmuley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
72. Did you all read the whole article?
It was like the ravings of a complete lunatic! WTF was he blathering on about having diarrhea and a cough?

The fact that this nutjob has reproduced 8 times is absolutely horrifying to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
74. This is basic to fundie sexuality
elehhhhna pretty much nailed it: Madonna-Whore. Guy sees his wife's body in a "mother" role, gets conflicted about it and rationalizes that it's her fault he doesn't find her sexy anymore because she's become a feeding/birthing machine. And thus is sexuality bad, because some men can't separate their lovers from their mothers.

Such guys need a psychologist a lot more than they need a god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
75. This fellow would be much happier with a man.
Men don't have "birth canals" and their breasts are pretty useless for anything but "romantic" purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyoftheRabbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
76. Are they...
SERIOUS??? :wtf: OMG... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
77. From my experience...
...I found that my breasts weren't de-eroticizaticized to my husband, but to myself. My husband still thought my breasts were sexy, but I couldn't see them, or experience them in that way, and even a full year after ending breast feeding, I still need a lot of foreplay before I'm comfortable with my husband touching my breasts. They totally changed for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
78. The whole article wasn't as sexist as I thought it would be
The guy is saying to keep thinking about your wives' bodies in an erotic sense, not a utilitarian sense. The way he says it is bad, but husbands do need to keep thinking of their wives in an erotic sense, for the sake of their marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #78
91. Squeamish men are not forced to focus on, say, the episiotomy procedure
Edited on Wed Aug-30-06 04:03 PM by elehhhhna
etc.

Sheesh. I wanted hubs by my head, for moral support...and Docs give 'em a choice. Dads aren't kept in handcuffs and leg-irons.


But an objection to BREASTFEEDING? Does this prove the old adage "Breast men are immature"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
80. what century are we living in, btw?
he can go get bent. Or unbent, as the case may be. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regularguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
81. Not one for piling on, but...
this is the probably the stupidest fucking thing I've ever - and I mean *ever* - read!

"as her husband witnesses one of the most attractive parts of her body serving a utilitarian rather than romantic purpose"

I mean holy fuck, please let this be some sort of joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
83. I wonder if he tells his wife to shut the hell up
just because he enjoys oral sex........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
84. Any man that would place his needs BEFORE that of my children,
on any matter, is doomed to be left out in the cold. It is simply a battle he will not win. I alone choose to give my affection and my body. Anyone who would compete with my babies will receive neither.


Some people are just twisted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u4ic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
85. That rabbi/'therapist'
is in desperate need of therapy...:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
86. What a self-centered POS
Since when is any part of a woman's body solely his domain for whatever purpose he wants it to be for? Pardon us if our body parts have multiple functions and your puny egos can't handle it. :sarcasm:

Effing grow up or go back home with your mommies. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
87. What I find interesting...
...is that, although it has been well-established that this piece of nonsense comes from a Conservative Rabbi (i.e. a member of the Jewish faith), lots of people here keep persisting in the notion that it somehow discredits Christianity.

:wtf:

(That's a little bit like saying that I could never convert to Buddhism because I don't like the Upanishads... :crazy: )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
88. I dont' know folks...That statue of Brit Spears on all fours giving...
...birth was kinda hot! just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
92. I'm so happy you posted this.
Obviously a woman's body serves no higher purpose than to be an object of sexual desire for the man who owns her. Just amazing! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC