The goal seemed to be to remove the squeaky heart first, and then disembowel and dismember the remains. But again, I don't see a dog doing this nonstop to literally hundreds of stuffed animals in a row. Doing so would take hours on end, no? And likely dry out the dog's mouth to the point of being uncomfortable? As you noted, your dog destroyed a couch in less than an hour... but at some point within that hour became bored and/or exhausted and/or uncomfortable, and stopped.
Thanks for the photo. I didn't see that, nor did I read the original article before I wrote my first post. But now that I see it, well... I honestly don't see the limbs, heads and stuffing from "hundreds" of teddy bears laying about. I do see several baskets of small bears overturned, but it looks like most of the little bears remain close to the basket, where they fell. So I presume they must be counting each of those little toys as being "chewed up" in the "rampage" to make their claim of "hundreds" of bears destroyed.
I am not familiar with the news source/reporter, so I don't know their record for journalistic integrity. However, the carefully worded article implies that the
entire $900,000.00 collection was destroyed, because the first mention of the word "collection" refers to only those bears which were destroyed, but the second use of the word "collection" refers to the entire collection, worth $900,000.00:
"A guard dog has ripped apart a collection of rare teddy bears, including one once owned by Elvis Presley, during a rampage at a children's museum."
then,
"The collection, valued at more than $900,000, included a red bear made by Farnell in 1910..."
In the sequence of the sentences using the word "collection," the second sentence disingenuously incorporates the first by inference.
The facts themselves, in fact, seem to be suspect here as another article quotes the same source as saying:
"
Up to 100 bears were involved in the massacre." (Emphasis mine.)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1835785,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11While in yet another article:
"Barney chewed up
all the bears, worth nearly $1-million." (Emphasis mine.)
"http://www.kpvi.com/index.cfm?page=nbcheadlines.cfm&ID=35533"
Additionally, this entire "rampage" by the "berserk" dog lasted only "several minutes," according to the security guard at the scene:
"A security guard at the museum, Greg West, said he spent several minutes chasing Barney before wrestling the dog to the ground."
(Source in OP.)
So, basically what happened is that the security dude let his dog wander off for several minutes and during that time the dog knocked over some baskets of small stuffed toys and chewed on a few others. Hardly a rampage, hardly a berserk dog. Some unfortunate and substantial damage, yes, as the Elvis bear alone - the most valuable - was worth between $58,000.00 - $75,000.00 (according to various sources). But not nearly the $900,000.00 worth of damage to which the article alludes.
So in conclusion, I abandon my position that this was an insurance scam, and instead assert that this incident, while unfortunate, was highly sensationalized to the point of being deceptive and unprofessional (save for the damage to Elvis' bear, which was the only truly newsworthy aspect of the incident).
I guess the moral of the story - for me, at least - is to do my homework before drawing conclusions.
:7