Charlie Sheen weighs on what happened on 9/11

[LynneSin]

http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix/65825.htm

SHEEN: WHAT 9/11 HIJACKERS?

March 23, 2006 -- CHARLIE Sheen has joined the 9/11 gone-bonkers brigade. The "Two and a Half Men" star gave a bizarre interview on GGN Radio Network's conspiracy-minded "The Alex Jones Show," in which he suggested that the federal government was covering up what "really" happened. "It seems to me like 19 amateurs with boxcutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions," Sheen said. "A couple of years ago, it was severely unpopular to talk about any of this. It feels like from the people I talk to, and the research I've done and around my circles, it feels like the worm is turning." Sheen said the collapse of the Twin Towers looked like a "controlled demolition." The out-there actor also expressed his disbelief over how one of the planes hit the Pentagon. "Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers . . . It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims, we owe it to everyone's life who was drastically altered, horrifically, that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

[Redstone]

1. What's next for him? Chemtrails?

Redstone

[Derailer]

3. You're kidding right?

How can we bemoan that the dreaded MSM never airs the truth if all we do is scoff and deride it when we hear it.

Reread the quote from Sheen and I think you'd agree there is no other logical conclusion. 9/11 wasn't pulled off by 19 second-rate bozos, thats for damn sure.

[BikeWriter]

9. 19 second-rate bozos funded by Saudi Princess Haifa...

Al-Faisal and drawn on Jonathan Bush Riggs Bank. It looks like a conspiracy to me, too.

[tigereye]

10. oh for heaven's sake

:(

19 scary and psychotic men funded by a foreign power did this. It was not a * conspiracy.

[BikeWriter]

15. I used to work in NORAD. I cannot believe NORAD failed...

unless they were purposely diverted.

[Redstone]

16. I'm invoking Redstone's Rule #2:

"Never argue with someone who sees things that aren't there."

Later.

Redstone

[bigwillq]

18. Hello.

Welcome to DU! :hi:

[underpants]

2. Ooookay so that show is basically over

or will they stay away from bringing ANY attention to this sort of thing?

I don't subscribe to LIHOP or MIHOP but I think that the worm is turning on the fact that 9/11 was, on our end, predicated with gross negligence (ABC)* and complete incompetence

*Anything But Clinton-anything that the Clinton administration supported, promoted, or inacted must IMMEDIATELY be disregarded, ignored, and reversed.

[Beware the Beast Man]

4. ABC- that is an excelent theory.

[underpants]

7. Theory?

The 10 YEAR ergonomics study commission by HHS head Elizabteh Dole in Poppa Bush's administration-inacted by Clinton-immediately reversed by Cheney excuse me the Bush administration.

The Public Land Use issue that resulted in 10 MILLION opinions being offered via actual town hall meetings, virtual town hall meetings, emails, and phone calls. Put in place as Clinton left office. Immediately reversed by Cheney. BTW this was a funny one as the logging and paper companies started showing up to the town hall meetings with their suits and were told off by what I like to call "Bubbas to Birkenstocks" so they sat back and claimed this was some great suprise by Clinton as he left office.

Richard Clark's book clearly shows that everything they were working on was completely ignored as soon as W&Co. got into office.

O'Neill's book says basically the same thing although he was at an international meeting to stifle terrorist funding and money transactions on 9/11 and watched the towers fall on a big screen outside (somewhere in Europe, forget where). First Nat.Security meeting they brought in photos of IRaq and a WMD lab.

Hell this "ABle Danger" thing was suddenly ended in February 2001. The LIHOP and MIHOP ers say it was part of the conspiracy but I think it was stained with Clinton in their eyes.

They reversed the Coal for bombs plan with No.Korea (AND reversed 50 years of US foreign policy-keep the military threat on the table).

And on and on and on.

ABC.

[DS1]

5. Why don't they point some opinion into their reporting?

Oh, it's the NY Post :eyes:

[Fenris]

11. Murdoch Media - It tells you the story...

And what to think about it!:eyes:

[nickgutierrez]

17. Fox News: We Report, We Decide

And You Like It That Way.

[hippiechick]

6. New Movie: 'United 93'

Purports to be the true story about what happened on that flight.
Now, I ask ya ... since there were NO SURVIVORS, and the military folks involved can't say a whole lot --- how can this really be the true story?

Did anyone interview Cheney, or review transcripts from his interactions that day ? :tinfoilhat:

Just askin' ....

[RedCloud]

8. You are supposed to believe that only two towers fell in NYC that day.

And that all planes were successfully hijacked.

And that Bush told us the truth, unlike in Iraq or Afghanistan.

the same George Bush who protected his daddy's papers about his Oct. 18th surprise.

The same george Bush whose grandpa used Jewish slave labor at Auschwitz.

Now who's got the conspiracy theory going?

[cssmall]

12. I honestly think that a better investigation could have been done.

However, I am not willing to publicly admit any of the things he said. For now, the knowledge is there that the hijackers were predominately Saudi Arabian. Not to mention, I have a source that told a member of their family that worked as an upper level executive within the WTC 1 was called at 9:30 the night of September 10th and told not to be at the Towers the next day. Coincidence probably.

But, the same source also clams the family member saw men examining the structure of the WTC 1. I don't know about that.

Don't knock his words. You get pissed at Rush and yet you get pissed at someone saying that 9/11 might've been a conspiracy? It's his right to speak out about it.

[ChoralScholar]

13. Govt. investigations often suck

(see Warren Commission)

I have to say, some of the things he said have crossed my mind at one time or the other. It does seem a bit out there...

[cssmall]

14. I realize that most government investigations suck.

However, I saw a show on the Warren Commission and two out of three tests revealed the same results as JFK's assassination. I didn't agree with the methodology though. So I'm not exactly certain of the results.

Yet, you're right the thought does seem far out, but what can you do? The investigation was completely obfuscated and the report was tedious at best and misguided at worst.

A French research group says they proved that the towers could have only fallen the way they did through a controlled demolition AFTER the fact. :shrug: