Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Thompson: Threatening to sue... Wikipedia editors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:26 AM
Original message
Jack Thompson: Threatening to sue... Wikipedia editors?
12:12 am Thompson Threatens Wikipedia; Says GamePolitics Editor is "Next"

We've had several e-mails from readers indicating that the Wikipedia has locked its entry on Jack Thompson. This all seemed to come to a head late Friday. Given the Wiki's popularity this will likely receive some major coverage the longer the entry stays down. Here's what we know about the situation:

On March 7th, Thompson sent an e-mail to the Wikipedia Foundation board in St. Petersburg, Florida claiming that his Wiki entry contained "a number of false, defamatory, and actionable statements about me. As an aside, you all don't even have my date and year of birth correct, and it goes downhill from there."

Thompson's e-mail doesn't specify which entries he finds offensive. His demand to the Wiki seeks "the real names, addresses, and phone numbers, and any other verifying information, regarding anyone who has posted anything about me at Wikipedia, as they will be defendants."

The outspoken attorney further tells the Wiki board, "You have thirty days to comply with this demand. The Seigenthaler experience shows that you must provide me this information."

"Secondly, I demand that your people contact me immediately so that we together can verify what is true and what is not true at your site. No one in her or her right mind does what you all do - passing off as 'fact' certain anonymous allegations on your web site that no one has vetted in any reasonable fashion. When I tried to correct some of them recently, Wikipedia removed my corrections treating them as 'vandalism.' The person who delighted in telling me that is the head of 'Wikipedian Atheists.' What a surprise. You have twenty days to comply with this demand."

Thompson's e-mail further claims that he has suffered "compensable harm" based on the Wiki entry and that he intends to file a libel suit if his demands are not met.

Here at GamePolitics, we take note of the following bizarre threat received in e-mail on March 10th. It was also cc'd to several game journalists. The subject line simply says, "Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. You're next, Mr. McCauley." The only information in the body is a link to Thompson's locked-down Wiki entry.


From: Jack Thompson
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:25 PM
To: dennis@gamepolitics.com; Aaron McKenna; Curt Feldman; Tor Thorsen; Brendan Sinclair; mattsaunderson

Subject: Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. You're next, Mr. McCauley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorney)

Jack Thompson, Attorney
Land line: 305-xxx-xxxx, Cell: 305-xxx-xxxx
xxxx South Dixie Hwy, Suite 111
Coral Gables, FL USA 33146 xxxxxxxxx@comcast.net

GP: I'm not quite sure what to make of this menacing e-mail. I can say that I resent the hell out of its implications and that neither this site nor its editor will be bullied or silenced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck this guy and his attempts to take away our 1st amendment rights.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can you post a link to the original article?
It sounds interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Doesn't say it's locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, I meant the original Game Politics article
Which I went and found on my own but which the OP does not reference at all. It's kind of not cool to post things you find elsewhere on the internet without a link to the original article.

http://gamepolitics.livejournal.com/228672.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. What a loony.
I saw the subject, and thought, "is that the Capitol Hill Blue guy?". Instead I find he's just some fundie with a bad hairpiece. Who cares what he thinks?

(oops, now he'll probably sue me...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC