Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't we have decent passenger rail service in this country?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:16 AM
Original message
Why can't we have decent passenger rail service in this country?
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 03:16 AM by JonathanChance
OK, I have the opportunity to go to the NAB convention in Vegas this April. I'm coming into some money, however there is one problem.

I. HATE. FLYING.

I have an intense fear of heights and the last time I was on an airline flight, I was scared shitless when the plane made a low altitude bank on its final approach into Mosinee. I am also a big guy, Those seats don't exactly fit me well.

OK, so I decide to hit up Amtrak to see if I can catch a train.

Turns out that Vegas has no train station. After a 34 hour long ride from Chicago, I'd have to catch a bus in Salt Lake after spending over 34 hours in coach, then catch a bus to Vegas.

I'd pay over 350 bones for the privelege (not including meals)

Meanwhile Orbitz says that I can go to Milwaukee, (Where the Amtrak station that will get me to Chicago is) and catch a four hour Midwest Express flight to Vegas and back again for $242

Why the hell can't we have an affordable TGV-style high speed rail network that connects every major city in the US? WHY???

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. From what I've been told
The airlines are heavily subsidized. The railways are not. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Airlines should have been told to sink or swim after 9/11.
Every last bobdamned one of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The subsidies were going on long before that
They get pulled out of bankruptcy after bankruptcy by the government. How often do private citizens get that luxury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. No money for infrastructure,
all extra funds must go to kill brown people in the middle east.

And besides, mass transit is bad for the oil company profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Republicorruptcons hate mass transit
mass transit means the masses, hence they must associate with them because the cannot own a gigantic SUV or German import that costs more than most houses.

Republicorruptcons hate the masses, except at election time. After that, they love stealing from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. I understand it's because the conductors do drugs on the job. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Read the "Crisis papers" article on the front DU page - "The View From
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 03:44 AM by Hissyspit
Abroad." It addresses this very issue from a comparison of U.S. and European infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Drive....
round up 3 friends and rent an SUV, ya know, one of those massive ones.

Seriously though, I hate to fly as well and I don't have the data to back it, but I guarantee it may cost the same as the flights anyway. You can always pull off into the breakdown lane too....

Of course the flight is only a few hours. I hate it, yet I love the near instant change of latitude that comes with a flight. Once that ride is over, I'm always glad I took it. Kinda like a roller-coaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. My problem is...
I'm afraid of the plane crashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. this was on the DU home page
Article by Ernest Partridge, comparing rails in Europe and Japan to the lack thereof in the US. Airports, airlines, roads and interstates heavily subsidize flying and private automobiles. Railroads were heavily subsidized too, back in the day. It used to be a primary means of transportation along with the horse and the stage and walking. Ivan Illich calls the automobile a radical monopoly - one which eliminates all other methods, but it did not in Europe. One advantage they and Japan have on us is a) higher population densities, b) shorter distances, and c) massive rebuilding of their infrastructure after WWII partly subsidized by America.

Even worse, IMO, than you not being able to get to Vegas is that there is no transit service from the exurb where I live to either KCK or KCMO. Utah is ahead of the rest of us on that, but they have an advantage there in that much of their population is on a line (in a valley) from Brigham City to Provo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. People want to drive their cars.
I think that's all there is to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benfea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because America would be in danger of being more energy efficient...
…and the terrorists would win if we allowed that! You don't want to be with the terrorists, do you? Surely you can't hate America that much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC