Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Anyone Just See The King Kong Preview on NBC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:00 PM
Original message
Did Anyone Just See The King Kong Preview on NBC?
My GOD, this movie looks awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw a personals ad...
And that version of King Kong looked rather more impressive...

But that's mixin' oranges with apples... nice oranges too. :evilgrin:

I've never been keen on remakes... just wait until they re-do "The Wizard of Oz" ('The Wiz' being sufficiently different, with Michael Jackson looking for a brain...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's three hours long...
...Peter Jackson's got some serious Oscar-hubris working there.

I remember seeing the 1930s original on television when I was about 8 years-old and crying at the end because I felt sorry for Kong. I didn't think he deserved the rap he got at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This looks like a mistake
I don't think it will be as cheesy or disastrous as the 1976 remake, but it looks like a soulless, boring, overwrought blockbuster just the same. I get that vibe heavily from the previews.

Some movies should never be remade. What made the original work can not be recaptured, no matter the talent of the director, the sophistication of the effects, or the bombast of marketing hype. The cast doesn't impress me, and after the initial buzz wears off, it will be crushed by the weight of its own expectations.

It will get the expected big bucks the first few weeks... then poof. Jackson's career will survive, since LOTR gave him a lot of mileage. It cannot, and will not, replace the 1933 original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed, I'm tired of remakes, no matter what technology has come
along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hey ZW.
Edited on Sun Nov-27-05 10:14 PM by Floogeldy
You work in the movie industry, correct? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. soulless?
I saw more emotion on the face of this computer-generated ape than I have in many movies I've seen with real actors in them this year.

I think this will be the biggest film of the year and get tremendous reviews. I can't wait for this to open.

And how can a King Kong movie be boring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I've said it once, I've said it a million times
Andy Serkis got screwed out of an Oscar.

Hell, the CGI acting I've seen lately has beaten most of the "real" acting out of Hollywood (FF7 Advent Children...which may be coming to an arthouse theater near you in Jan). No wonder they were scared shitless about Gollum and fought against that nomination as hard as they could. Primadonnas might actually have to, you know, earn that 20 million or get replaced by a computer.

I can't wait for this movie to open either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Son of Kong was saddder.
That hand sinking with the island.

This one seems to follow the original plot straight through. If he nailed New York City in 1930 this will be very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go to this site and see the Teaser . . . .
Go here: http://www.kingkongmovie.com /

Click on Trailer. Choose Teaser.

Woooooooooooh!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, but I saw an extended on in the theatre before Harry Potter...
It looks great...and who knew that Jack Black could act something other than stupid.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. damn, forgot all about it
wish I had remembered.

is the new trailer up anywhere else? I know i saw Kong leaping up at a bi-plane while on top of the Empire State Building...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just saw the teaser.....
I am glad they kept it set in the 1930's....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mockmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I am too
It makes it more interesting visually. Hard for them to use product placement every 5 seconds also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC