|
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 12:05 PM by HereKittyKitty
I posted a dupe of what I posted here, asking for info on the scope of the first Amendment because I had a friend who had received some annoying emails, the emailer telling her that he had a Constitutional right to email her whenever he wanted. I didn't ask for advice for the friend- She has everything WELL under control and now hasn't (so far) gotten any more email. They were unwanted forwards, jokes, and "Hey, what's up" kind of messages, but unwanted nonetheless. I did not run there hysterical about a bunch of emails- In fact, the only reason I MENTIONED my friend's situation was to explain that I wanted to know how the FA applies to a situation like this. I thanked all those who offered kind responses.
One person went off saying awful things about my friend, about how she was enjoying the attention, about how the guy was better off without the likes of her, that sort of thing, and it upset me. As many people (especially sensitive ones like me) do, I get upset when someone attacks me or someone that I care about. So I emailed them back, scolding them for judging someone they don't know in a situation they know nothing about. Then this woman chimes in. Just for your amusement, here is the exchange. I know I shouldn't have responded to her, but I did. Now I'm unregistered, so she can lie to her heart's content without any worry about a response from me.
She can even go on making up imaginary children that I have. Not only do I not have a daughter (never implied that I did), but I don't have any child over 5. I'm not OLD enough to have a daughter old enough to be in this situation.
Here you go- This only includes the exchange between myself and the person I'm talking about :
------------------ Her: "Most emails have blockers on them to stop unwanted emails. Your daughter can also contact the ex-boyfriend's service provider and file a complaint.
(She's quoting me here)"Sorry again, but I fail to see what all the unsolicited advice to the email recipient has to do with the scope of the First Amendment."
(back to her)Because most of us exist in the real world, and after having conversed on the Internet for years, realize that sometimes a whacko will get bothersome and one has to take simple steps to disengage and move on. Little email intrusions are nothing compared to what many others of us have had to deal with.
If your daughter truly can't change her email, then the best thing to do besides (1) using a blocker and/or (2) filing a complaint with his service provider... is to just ignore, and he will probably get bored with non-responses and move on himself.
As for your gestapo approach to query posting... There's the intent of the first amendment, and then there's the reality of what has to happen to enforce it. So coming here and telling everyone off that doesn't stay within the bounds of what you demand for an answer is ridiculous.
You're making one hell of a mountain out of molehill. ------------------
My response: (quoting her)"Little email intrusions are nothing compared to what many others of us have had to deal with"
Are you referring to those of us who have (edited to remove something too personal, but can be replaced by the words "stalked and abused") If so, then you're right. When you've nearly been murdered by an ex, someone else's little email intrusions seem insignificant. Which is why I didn't make a "Mountain" out of a few annoying unwanted emails. SO why would you accuse ME of making the mountain out of the molehill here?
I just wanted to know if the First Amendment allowed ANY of us to say ANYTHING we want to ANYONE we want. I didn't come here all hysterical about some unwanted emails.
If I had a daughter (I don't) and if I were involved in the situation, maybe I would be making a big deal of the emails. My history as a domestic violence survivor and near- murder victim are all the more reason for me not to get involved in someone else's drama. I prefer to leave that to the police. The only suggestions you offer that she did NOT already follow are using a blocker (She opted to save the emails to show the police instead) and changing her email (not possible). Possibly due to my own history,I agree 100% with her decision to take the most extreme action (within the bounds of the law) possible to get him out of her hair, which is involving law enforcement. I'm sorry if you don't agree.
If you would reread the conversation, you can see that my "gestapo approach", as you call it, arose from some very insulting comments made toward my friend, which were unfair and unwarranted (and which have now been apologized for by the poster, which I appreciate). When I or someone I care about is attacked, I (like many, especially those of us who are parents) react.
I hardly call my decision not to respond to certain discussions a "gestapo approach". I didn't silence or ATTEMPT to silence anyone, but it is just as much my right to REFUSE to respond as it is for the person to post.
(the "gestapo approach" she's talking about here is in regard to my posting that I would no longer respond to the posts about my friend since they had been insulting and were not the issue I was posting about)
------------------ Her response (getting nutty now):
(note- At this point, I had decided to leave and I went back and deleted EVERY post in my history except for the last few) "Well, here's the deal, Joshua's Mommy...
No matter what happened to your daughter, friend, or whoever... the irony is breathtaking that anyone would log on to a public, democratic board and demand that only lawyers be allowed to offer their opinions on the issue of email and free speech.
The irony is not only significant enough to make one's head spin, but it is a perfect example of why BushCo was able to flamboozle the masses with his civil-rights-busting patriot act nonsense.
Secondly, I read your comments several times (though it seems you have now deleted the initial post)... and your story seems to keep shifting.... first it was just unwanted casual emails... "hi, how are you" I believe you indicated... Now you are coloring it with your own history of abuse. There's a vast difference.
It is also a significant indicator that you chose to identify yourself at an adult board as someone's mommy, instead of just choosing an adult moniker or your first name.
You are not the only person here, or have a child or friend, suffer from abuse or stalking, and attacking other people who are simply trying to help... perhaps from their own experience, is just wrong.
If your friend is already working with law enforcement, then basically you already knew whether this was an issue of "free speech," which, of course, it was not.
At any rate, I hope the situation is remedied and that you and yours remain safe from harm. "
------------------ The quotation marks are where I quoted her. Statements without quotes are mine, and I should note that I never "demanded" an answer of any sort, let alone one ONLY from a lawyer. I used "lawyers" in the subject line for no other reason than to get the attention of any lawyers who might be there and might know the answer. I got several constructive responses from non- lawyers and they were thanked for it.... My response (I should have just held it in and not responded at all, but I was angry):
"Well, here's the deal, Joshua's Mommy... "
Really?
"No matter what happened to your daughter, friend, or whoever... the irony is breathtaking that anyone would log on to a public, democratic board and demand that only lawyers be allowed to offer their opinions on the issue of email and free speech."
You are ABSOLUTELY correct. That is why I didn't do that and would NOT do that. Several NON lawyers here offered constructive answers, free of attacks. And they were thanked.
"The irony is not only significant enough to make one's head spin, but it is a perfect example of why BushCo was able to flamboozle the masses with his civil-rights-busting patriot act nonsense."
See above.
"Secondly, I read your comments several times"
Somehow I doubt that. Your next set of comments sort of disprove the above statement.
"(though it seems you have now deleted the initial post)... and your story seems to keep shifting.... first it was just unwanted casual emails... "hi, how are you" I believe you indicated... Now you are coloring it with your own history of abuse. There's a vast difference."
WOW is all I can say.
First of all, if you're reading my posts, then where did this DAUGHTER of mine come from? I have no daughter. I never implied I had one. That's crazy.
Additionally, My story never shifted ONCE. MY history of abuse from MY ex husband is MY experience. HERS is unwanted casual emails. I never said otherwise. In fact, I myself stated there was a vast difference. Please read before responding to avoid this type of error in the future.
And yes, I have deleted the initial post as well as MOST of my post, as I want every trace of me to be gone when I leave here. That is my right. If you REMAIN confused about what I said, I'm sure that the moderators here probably have access to the posts that I deleted. Evidently it isn't a problem for you that I deleted them, because it has allowed you this opportunity to make the baseless accusation that I have somehow shifted my story. So enjoy the chance to rewrite history (of course, that is the politically correct term for what you are doing) while you can.
"It is also a significant indicator that you chose to identify yourself at an adult board as someone's mommy, instead of just choosing an adult moniker or your first name."
What does my username have to do with this? Good grief. And what is not "adult" about identifying myself as a parent? What's up with you- You've run out of things to attack, so now you attack my user name? Very sad. Isn't it more fun just to go back to rewriting history and claiming that I changed my story?
"You are not the only person here, or have a child or friend, suffer from abuse or stalking,"
#1- Why do you keep talking about my child? My elementary school aged son is NOT suffering from abuse or stalking
#2- I don't have a friend suffering from abuse or stalking. I have a friend who has received some annoying emails.
#3- Not only did I NOT claim to have a "child or friend" suffering from abuse or stalking, I also did not claim to be the "only" one.
"If your friend is already working with law enforcement, then basically you already knew whether this was an issue of "free speech," which, of course, it was not."
First of all, I know few police officers skilled in the interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. I'm glad to hear that, wherever you live, the officers of your police department are Constitutional scholars. Unfortunately, the ones in my town are not, and the ones in my friend's city apparently are not. However, have it your way. I have no right to post here asking for information about the Constitution. I already knew the info and just posted here to waste my time and cause trouble. Please forgive me for doing something so awful.
A word of advice to you: Please READ before you post- My message and then your response to it are right out here for the world to see. Please be sure you know what you are saying before you say it. Your logic is DEEPLY flawed (claiming somehow that I'm comparing annoying "hi, how are you" and joke emails to stalking and abuse is a BIG stretch and claiming that I said only lawyers could respond just because I mention "lawyers" in the subject line to get their attention is laughable). The anger you are directing toward someone you don't even know who said nothing at all to insult or hurt you is just a BIT much as well.
Good day, Ma'am. (Of course, it's only right for a child to address her elder in this manner)
--------------- I then posted two more messages before unregistering:
Me:
Some history can't be rewritten while the message still remains posted:
Joshuasmommy:
""Little email intrusions are nothing compared to what many others of us have had to deal with"
Are you referring to those of us who have had an ex husband steal our mail, poison our cat, break the windows out of our car, and choke us to the point of unconsciousness? If so, then you're right. When you've nearly been murdered by an ex, someone else's little email intrusions seem insignificant. Which is why I didn't make a "Mountain" out of a few annoying unwanted emails. SO why would you accuse ME of making the mountain out of the molehill here?"
You must be a very angry person to be so intent on attacking someone that you not only don't read the message you're responding to, but you start attacking their username when you run out of things to say. I'm so sorry for whatever is going on in your life to make you such a bitter and angry person. The good news is that this "non- adult" is leaving due to the bad behavior of other posters here (including yourself.
And, before you say it, I won't let the door hit me on the way out (Though I'm sure you would enjoy that as well).
and then I posted this and unregistered.
Thank you very much to everyone who answered without attacking. I truly appreciate the information. Good luck to everyone.
Anyway, flame away if you want, but I needed to vent and maybe pick up a little sympathy. I am now persona- non- grata and my state board because one of the group's LEADERS (yes, she is) is a flaming asshole who can't read.
|