Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chimp Brain Syndrome...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:03 AM
Original message
Chimp Brain Syndrome...
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:19 AM by tk2kewl

Finally! A diagnosis of the President's brain disorder!




Is brain still developing?

Discovery of two gene variations have some scientists saying that human think tank will continue to evolve

BY JAMIE TALAN
STAFF WRITER

September 9, 2005

Scientists have discovered a gene variation, perhaps involved in brain size, that showed up only 6,000 years ago - a mere blink of the eye in evolutionary time.

<snip>

Analyzing DNA samples from individuals throughout the world, they identified two genetic varieties that are unique to humans. One called abnormal spindle-like microcephaly, or ASPM, first appeared 6,000 years and is now found in 30 percent of the population. The other, called microcephalin, evolved about 37,000 years ago and has spread to more than 70 percent of the population.

<snip>

People with damage to either of these two genes - microencephalin and ASPM - have smaller brains, equal in size to chimp brains. They also suffer from impaired cognitive abilities and have severe language problems.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wait a minute.
This would imply that at least 70% of the population have chimp-sized brains? This makes no sense. Also, if it's in 70% of us, it must be adaptively positive, or it would have been bred down to a much lower level. Again, the 70% number makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 70% have the gene not the mutation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC