Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are women's bodies really THAT different?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:43 PM
Original message
Are women's bodies really THAT different?
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 02:45 PM by SoCalDem
In most sports that both sexes participate in, the "uniform" is pretty much the same (except for the obvious ones like ice skating)..Danica, the race driver wore the same get up as the guys..female jockeys wear the same gear...baseball/softball players wear the same..soccer..ditto..

Why does the body difference go completely haywire in ONE sport?

I'm thinking volleyball....Men dress in comfy loose "uniforms", and then there are the getups that women "get to/want to" wear..

The old lady in me wants to tell these women that the huge crowds they draw (mostly male?) are not about their level of play..The feminist in me says they should wear what they want...but do they really want to wear those brightly colored spandex bandaids? or are the using their bodies to generate "heat" for their sport??



GUY....................................................................not guy


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yuck
I don't want to see her butt sweat. And don't those get-ups cause serious grundies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. My point exactly.. How can they feel "comfortable"
in a sport that requires diving into sand...jumping...running.. with a sand-coated,neoprene wedgie:shrug:

and of course the only photos that the AP can seem to get of these women, are the ones shot low, from behind, or onces where the "players" embrace each other...or ...(well you get my drift).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Treating women like props seems to be getting more popular, not less.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Treating PEOPLE like props...
...it's everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissHoneychurch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. those "uniforms" are requirements
the girls don't wear those short pants for fun. There is one case that a team had to pay a fine because they wore longer pants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's crazy.
What century is this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. and if all the players refused, would women's volleyball cease to exist?
That's the problem.."someone" is forcing those uniforms on them to 'sex up' their sport.

I guess soccer could be played in bikinis, and so could other sports, but when women aske to be taken seriously, and then tolerate a dress code that makes no sense...well.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piltdown13 Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Same thing with track uniforms
At least in high school, we got to wear regular running shorts like the guys, but in college....well, the guys kept their shorts while we switched to "briefs" with our singlets (a little more coverage than a bikini, but not much). According to my coach, the briefs were "more aerodynamic" than shorts; I didn't believe this for a second, because if it were true, you better believe the guys would be wearing Speedos or the like. Unfortunately, it came down to a team vote, and most of my teammates bought into the "aerodynamics" explanation, so I spent four years with a wedgie. Those damn things actually flattered only about ten percent of the women at the average meet -- most of the distance runners were skinny enough that the briefs were actually baggy, and most everyone else had a large enough backside that they rode up unmercifully. Nothing quite so classy as watching race after race end with each participant pulling her uniform out of her ass as she crosses the finish line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. They don't want the tan lines?
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 03:04 PM by gmoney
<flamebait removed>

And I'm sure there's the commercial/prurient appeal of scantily clad women. These women are fully aware of it when they take up the sport -- they are ENTERTAINERS first and foremost, as are all other athletes. It's like wondering why Vegas showgirls don't wear long sleeve sweaters and cargo pants.

And besides, if I had the body of a professional athlete, you couldn't keep the clothing ON me... of all the things in the world to complain about.

Would it help if we blamed the tiny outfits on global warming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Most female athletes are NOT
entertainers.

Cheerleaders yes, volleyball players maybe, most other female athletes no.

Do men play sports just to be looked at? Even the pickup game in the corner lot?

NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Right, but all PROFESSIONAL athletes are entertainers.
If you want to play volleyball in your backyard, you can wear a suit of armor if you like... but if you want to get paid and play on TV, it's going to be made entertaining, including the uniform.

Look at baseball uniforms... they are a LOT more snug than in the old days. Same with football uniforms (although there tight clothes serve a function in not providing an easy place to grip). It's an effort to make the athletes look more like the V shaped male ideal, which makes them look more athletic to males, and may provide a certain sex appeal to women and some men.

And the pickup game at the corner lot is largely a form of entertainment and showmanship, especially these days, since everyone imagines themselves as part of the movie "White Men Can't Jump" -- people still get mugged for their pricey shoes or jerseys.

Back in the day, men basketball players wore pretty tiny uniforms -- not sure if it was to keep cool, or to emphasize their physique or freedom of motion. Today, the NBA uniforms are strictly fashion, and the fashion is LONG shorts and baggy. Same for the WNBA players... who are lucky to get a respectable number of people at a game and more than a handful of games on TV. I don't know... would dressing these players like beach volleyballers boost the ratings/turnout? I doubt it would hurt.

But when did women't soccer finally start getting attention... when they started marketing that adorable Mia Hamm, and when Brandi Chastain took off her jersey. If she hadn't done so, would that women's championship have received more than a passing mention on TV or other MSM? Not too likely.

Sex sells. It sells to men and women. All the professional sports are competing for ad dollars and ticket sales, and they'll do everything they can to leverage an attractive player, whether it's based on ability or looks or some other intangible. Would Michael Jordan be Michael Jordan if he wasn't photogenic and well-spoken and ENTERTAINING? They might have won the championships, but he probably wouldn't be as visible outside the game as he's been, even in the years since his retirements. Anna Kournikova isn't the greatest woman tennis player, but I'll bet she gets a higher percentage of her matches on TV than other players with similar ranking. It's all part of the entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. it's a "beach" sport, like surfing
men wear popular men's beach wear, while women wear popular women's beach wear (similar to surfing). i would assume that this is why regular women's volleyball players (not beach volleyball) don't dress like this :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC