Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many jurors were bought by MJ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:20 PM
Original message
Poll question: How many jurors were bought by MJ?
I cannot believe these jurors found him not guilty of EVERYTHING. So everyone---the victims and all, were lying? Fuck that. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. the kids stoLe the jesus juice
you gonna punish him for that? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you are the voice of reason
lets riot anyway. I'm a little upset he got off, because I truly believe he is guilty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. oh me too
i guess the sequined gLove didn't fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. He's as freakin guilty as OJ "Slasher" Simpson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Comment
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 04:48 PM by Jack Rabbit
I served on a jury in California in a child molestation case several years ago. I was not surprised by this verdict.

That case, like this one, came down to simply whether or not the prosecution witnesses could be believed. The alleged victim was 12 at the time of the incident and 15 at the time of the trial. The young lady had a motivation to make up a story; she was late getting home for supper and her mother, an alcoholic, was known to beat her under such circumstances. On the other hand, the defendant was twice convicted of rape many years before. The alleged victim had no way of knowing that and, if she wasn't telling the truth, she couldn't have picked a better fall guy.

There were three counts. The improper touching of the young lady allegedly took place during a riotous game of grab ass with several other youngsters in a small house.

It took three years to bring the case to trial. During that time she altered her story so that what was initially one count was expanded to three. On one occasion, she told a doctor that nothing actually happened and the defense was able to secure the doctor's testimony to that effect.

We had no trouble finding the defendant not guilty on two counts. The third one, which formed the core of the young lady's story, was a stickier issue. We hung on that count with a majority favoring acquittal. I don't know whether the defendant was retried or not.

I voted not guilty on all three counts. For me, if I couldn't believe part of the young lady's story, I couldn't believe any of it, at least not enough to send a man to prison. During deliberations, one of the jurors conviction on the last count, asked me if I thought that maybe he was guilty. "Yes, I think that maybe he he did it," I said. "But the standard of proof here is beyond a reasonable doubt. 'Maybe' won't do it."

There might have been some discussion like that in these deliberations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. All .... plus two alternates.
Good for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Honestly, why do people care?
Were you molested by Michael Jackson? Do you feel that you or your kids will be in danger now that Michael Jackson is free?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. None.
The verdict is fair and wasn't corrupted or influenced with bribes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't that what they call "denial"?
Followed by "anger," then "depression." I forget what comes next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. What strange times we live in.
Wars can be started on total lies, the traitors are the "patriots," Bush gets reelected, and MJ is found not guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC