Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Math help needed (night before a big test); A.K.A 'ATTENTION MATH FREAKS!'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:37 PM
Original message
Math help needed (night before a big test); A.K.A 'ATTENTION MATH FREAKS!'
Edited on Thu May-19-05 06:44 PM by Mass_Liberal
Question:

Edit: math talk doesn't work on DU so w/ words

Find the number x to two significant digits if 0 is less than or equal to x which is less than equal to (pi/2) and if sin x= .6669


Note: Evaluate without using a table or calculator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't look at me. I'm re-learning 7th grade math
(my daughter's)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Listen,
go to law school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm in high school
Edited on Thu May-19-05 06:40 PM by Mass_Liberal
Believe me, if it were up to me, I'd do 6 months hard labor to drop math forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. calculator allowed?
If so: just arcsin(.6669)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. nah
the bastards won't let me use the calculator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
this is urgent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ummmm.......
Hemingway? :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. In degrees or Radians
The first part 0 LTorE to x LTorE PI/2 shows that x is an angle in the 1st quadrant. you then just need to take the arcsin of .6669 which is 42 degrees (to 2 sig digits) or .73 radians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. ok
I know that the first part narrows it down to the 1st quadrant. But how do I do inverse of sin(.6669) without a calculator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Use the definition the sin. y/r. Where r = Hypotenuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That is much harder.
Do you not have tables where you can see and interpelate the values? If not you will need some aproximation formula. Did they give you any of those. I don't remember any. I know there are a lot of transformation formula too, but they would depend on you having tables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I have done a google for different arcsin
identity functions. I can not find one without having 1 more piece of info (like the cos(x) ) Are you supposed to have memorized values for PI/4 and PI/6? - you could use that to interpelate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. bump
or I'm screwed :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Can you assume r=1?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I just thought of something.
Edited on Thu May-19-05 07:01 PM by Crazy Guggenheim
Can it be assume you are using x as the horizontal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. What class is this for?
My trig is really shaky, so my first reaction would be to use a numerical method, in particular the Taylor series expansion for the arcsin function. If this isn't a Calc II class or so, then I don't think you'd be expected to know that, and even if you were it's an awful lot of multiplying and dividing by hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. And don't forget Eliptical Appoximations either ........
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Ya got a better concrete solution?
Post #20 agrees that it's a way of breaking the problem down into arithmetic that can be done by hand (albeit painfully).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's got to be simpler than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's why I asked what course it was.
If it's a Calc II course, they're probably expecting you to use the Taylor Series apporach I suggested. (And it's not like a Taylor series are that sophisticated.) If however it's in a course that doesn't assume knowledge of calculus, then obviously a different solution is in order. But since nobody else here can think of an alternate method of computing arcsins by hand, I don't see what's so laughable about using Taylor series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Math, algebra, calculus are for people who likemath, algebra, calculus.
Ick I hate that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. here's your answer
Go to http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InverseSine.html and scroll down to "The Maclaurin series for the inverse sine..."

You'll still have to crunch some numbers, but it turns the problem into simple multiplications and additions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. How's it going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. Anything yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrewerJohn Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. Here's a solution that takes less calculation than using series
If you play with the numbers a little bit, it becomes clear that x is just a hair less than pi/4 (recall that sin(pi/4) = 0.707 (half the square root of 2)). So if you use the trig identity

sin(a-b) = sin a cos b - cos a sin b

with a set equal to pi/4, you get

0.6669 = sin(pi/4 - b) = sin(pi/4)cos b - cos(pi/4)sin b.

But both sin(pi/4) and cos(pi/4) are equal to 0.707, so immediately this reduces to

0.6669 = 0.707(cos b - sin b), which you solve for b. But b is pretty dang small, so you can use the simplest approximation for both functions: cos b is approximately 1, and sin b is approximately b, for b much smaller than 1. So then

0.6669 = 0.707(1 - b) (approximately). Solve this and get b = 0.0567 (approximately), after some arithmetic. Then the total angle x is pi/4 - 0.0567, or 0.73 to two places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. That's one of 'em!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC