|
most rap, most heavy metal... some country I guess but that stuff is more of a depressant than encouraging anti-social behavior.
Now songs that try to incite social awareness is one thing - advocating or praising violence is another.
I'll welcome anything with a positive message, regardless of format. I can even give some respect to those faux Christian CDs being sold at 10:30PM in those dorky commercials...
But back to what I dislike, negative messages and truly bad influences: Eminem's grand contribution to society deserves only one award: "Outstanding achievement for contributing to the breakdown of society" - the same award goes to the heavy metal and rap groups who relish the use of "unsavory lyrics" condoning rape, violence, or murder.
But the real question is, who is responsible for the direction that music genres head in? The artists, or the companies who control the artists?
That old Bill O'Really special he shoveled out had some good points about American media (especially the music industry), but he clearly neglected to mention the root cause of the problem he seems to love so dearly: Such trashy music sells lots of albums and thus makes the record labels lots of big money. The record labels are essentially the problem for condoning the behavior and actions of the artists. They allow it because they will get rich off of it. As long as the conservative media industry condones this atrocity to continue, Billy Boy's dream of a sanitized society is never ever EVER going to happen. Not ever. And he's got to realize that instead of being the usual "We're republicans, do as we say and don't think about it" republican robot.
So, in the end, are the envelope-pushing artists the real problem? Or the corporations who entice bands and groups to create such unsavory 'art' because it'll make them richer in the end?
Again, corporate America is leaching off the system and then turns around and blames the people they exploit. Absolutely sickening.
|