Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If William Jennings Bryan is the nominee in 1900 I will not vote for him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:45 PM
Original message
If William Jennings Bryan is the nominee in 1900 I will not vote for him
He's a demagogue and a free silver man! End of story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. By Gawd, I'm with you. I'm for Debs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
94. You're going to vote for debutantes?
What's up with that? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Okay but then the Republicans will win and it will be ALL your fault! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is Cleveland thinking of running again?
I love his no-nonsense, honest approach to government. Bryan is too much of a fundy, in my opinion, but I love his common man approach.

Looking forward a bit, who do you think will be our nominee in 19 ought 4?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I hear Frances Cleveland might run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. so, what do you think of this suffragette movement ?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think it's a little too early to think about women's suffrage
The country doesn't seem ready for it. Give it another 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Give women the vote?
Next thing you know they'll want to own property!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Damn. There went my diet coke
You have now gotten me out of character. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
64. or *gasp* minorities will be asking for their rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Come on now.
All that would do is just double the votes for married men, and in the event an unmarried lass attempts to vote, it would be like marking ballots at random. I certainly don't think we need to go out on such a limb in such a close race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Cleveland got lucky. He only won because Harrison's wife died.
If Harrison didn't have the misfortune of a sick wife, he would have been hitting the campaign trail 24-7.

Cleveland should give it a rest, he'll never beat McKinley, he's too old now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well, that's debateable. But I do hear Grover only has
a couple years left in his old body. I love the guy, but it's time to move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. At least he's not Henry Cabot Lodge
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, Lodge. Fucking isolationist
Like there aren't any countries outside the US! Hey, Henry, it ain't 1892 anymore! We're moving into the 20th century, for God's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. What? You'd let that Republican ass McKinley be elected????
Good God, man, have you NO shame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Who knows, maybe some anarchist might get hold of him
I hear among the grapevine that TR may be his running mate. A man who is a progressive Republican. We can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbert836 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
61. Anarchy has been spreading lately.
They killed Tsar Alexander in Russia a few years back, and I heard a few days ago that King Emmanuel of Italy was killed by a bomb under his carriage. It's only a matter of time until it comes here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. McKinley is unelectable with that loose-cannon, inexperienced running mate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. No kidding!
Hey, Roosevelt, it ain't Cubia, so calm down! Seriously, that egomaniac would probably charge into the white house on horseback, firing his sidearm into the inaugural crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Guffaw!
Next, you'll tell me that girls and mothers will be granted the franchise -- and perhaps even the Negro!

Then, you will tell me that in one hundred years, the White House shall be occupied by a semi-literate oiler from Texas! Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Pish. Those women are no more likely to win sufferage
then those teetotallers are to enact their crazy ideas of prohibiting sale of alcohol. Ha! Ha!

And a semi-literate failure being our President? How droll! Certainly something so counter to the esteemed rank of President of the Republic is only a fanciful jest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Especially with that evil mastermind Mark Hanna running his campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. What are you talking about?
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 02:58 PM by Lone Pawn
How on Earth could you not vote for Bryan? Cross of Gold was the greatest display of oratory even to be given by an American! He could very well be the populist change this party needs! And, for God's sakes, would you prefer a big-money man like McKinley?

I suppose you'd rather throw your vote to Donnelly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You're right - great speech! But what a crazy fundy
shit, I'm so undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. He's not a fundy, he's passionate!
He's a man of the people--not like that elitist McKinley. Of course he's got some fire; he's got the energy to get things fixed in Washington!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Okay, you're selling me on this.
You really think Bryan could win? I'm betting my cross of gold on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well, he lost '96 pretty bad, but
I think things are shaping up pretty well. With a strong showing in the swing states of Kansas, Nebraska, W. Virginia, and Iowa, I think we can pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The 96 election is my main concern.
don't want my candidate to be considered a "loser." But, I do need to vote on principle, and Bryan is the progressive we need. You sold me.

Now, to bet the mortgage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Best. Thread. Ever. n/t
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. Indeed. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think it was a mistake for us to go into the Phillipines
But now that we're there, a unilateral withdrawl would leave the place in chaos and play into the hands of the Japanese!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Certainly. I think we should pull out after we train
a Filipino army to fight the Bolo insurgents, and then keep US troops on naval bases there for, say, 50 years. That would let us check any Japanese threats until the Filipinos are capable of self-rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. The Japanese! Those sandal-wearing goldfish tenders?
Bah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. They just kicked China's ass over Korea,
and they're looking to fight a war with Russia. Mind you, I don't think they have a chance in Hell against the Russians, but the Japanese aren't anything to sneeze at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. The Japanese are only a threat to other Asiatics
They stand no chance against a White Man's army. I hear their eyesight is so poor they can't even aim a rifle properly.

Still, they could turn the inscrutable masses of China against our merchants and missionaries. The Dowager Empress isn't going to live forever you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I agree, but
the Filipinos are Asiatics as well, and we don't want to make our white elephant the crown jewel of the Japanese empire. If the Japanese and Chinese were to ally together with the Indo-Chinese, the Manchurians, and the Filipinos, we would have an irritating fight on our hands. They've already proven in the Philippines that, once captured, they become too barbaric to civilize properly. Such a war of races would clearly be a victory for Westerners, yes, but at what cost? Surely such an endeavour would yield us no more territory than our foray into the Philippines, but yet would cost us unknown amounts in lost trade and income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
74. come come now. Are you insinuating that the Europeans could lose control
of their colonies there. Next you'll be telling me that the Indo-Chinese will boot the French out at gunpoint! HA HA HA!

I say just keep the opium flowing and those barbarians will stay pacified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I hear there are tensions mounting between Japan and Russia
Man, those czarists will kick some Japanese butt. I mean, come on! We have no need to worry about little ol' Japan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbert836 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
58. I don't know. I' not totally sold on the opposition for that one
Manifest destiny is still going on, and it may be our destiny to bring civilization to the Pacific. we don't want our new territory Hawaii being suprise attacked by the Japanese in 40 or so years, after all. Besides, we're spreading civilization and Christianizing the natives over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. I hear there's an up-and-coming guy named Roosevelt.
He's with that progressive party that ended slavery, the Republicans. Keep an eye out for this guy! I'd support him in a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. This isn't REPUBLICAN Underground!
Look, you can argue about the merits of Lincoln all you want too, but the Republicans haven't had a good President since, and Roosevelt won't be any better than the last few Republican failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Roosevelt is a dangerous reactionary! Even Mark Hanna hates him...
However, he has a hot daughter:

rrrrrrrowl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. WHOA!!! HUBBA, HUBBA!!!!!!!
She's finer than frog hairs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Well, good points, but I'm telling you,
this guy, "Teddy" Roosevelt, is awesome! He believes in protecting national forests, for example. He's also pretty populist on economic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Protect the forests?
Why don't you anarchists just come out and say you'd like to break up the trusts and encourage omnibus drivers to commit unspeakable acts with their horses in the public byway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. Yeah, sure! He's just a stupid imperialist...
who will ignore the workers like everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
49. He's a brash imperialist with a huge ego. No, thank you. n/t
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 05:09 PM by Darranar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbert836 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
60. We're not Republicans here
But if push came to shove, i'd definitely support him. He has a good background in Cuba, and has been known to be very progressive, despite his party. Kind of a modern-day Abraham Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. History geeks are funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. You better vote for him, I hear that Roosevelt will resign and let Sherman
take over as VP!

Can you imagine having to run against John Sherman in 1904! All he wants to do is make millions of dollars for his friends in the bond market.

The Republicans will control the White House for 20 years if this is allowed to happen! A Dictatorship will be upon us.

Though I hear Sherman is also starting to fail in health, this could be a constitutional crisis like nothing we have ever seen!

So for the love of your country put away your petty squabbles and vote for WJB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. LONG LIVE THE BULL MOOSE PARTY!!!!
Strewth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
44. AMERICANS!!! I HATE YOU!!! I HATE YOU ALL!!!
You staged a phony war and STOLE TERRITORY from us (Cuba)! I hope you'll evolve over the next 100 years and don't do anymore of these slimy schemes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Shut up, Spaniard!
We gave the Cubians their freedom! If you want to complain about stealing territory, ask for the Philippines back already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. You can have it. I'm busy campaigning for the Republic.
Once we can make this country into a Republic (again!) everything's gonna be all right here. I'm sick of wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Of course we are a Republic now!
We are the THE Republic on the Earth! We are the greatest people on Earth--of course we deserve to show the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Cuba for the Cubans, I say. We stole stolen goods. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
48. WJB is moving the party to the left--where it should be!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Wrong! Bryan is obsessed with the gold/silver debate...
and is only too happy to ignore more urgent labor matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftPeopleFinishFirst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
54. Free silver bastard!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Deflation supporter!
You're just against people having more money, aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #54
70. Damn right. Say no to the free coinage of silver at 16:1
I was born a gold man and I will die a gold man. That J.P Morgan is a friend of mine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
56. McKinley has blood on his hands with the Spanish-American War
I don't want us involved any more imperial wars. Although the wingnuts in the North will probably vote for McKinley because of the War. Bryan is anti-war and I would definitely support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #56
93. McKinley is definitely an imperialist
He supports the British in the Boer War. He won't get my vote because of the Boer issue. I say no to empire building. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbert836 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. He's a demagogue!?
He's a great speaker. I wasn't for silver coinage originally, but when I heard (about) his Cross of Gold speech, it totally convinced me. We have to support whoever is the nominee, despite their politics. We don't want that pasty McKinely guy do win, now do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Sound money is the foundation of the Republic
Free coinage of silver is so irresponsible one might as well suspend specie payments and issue unsecured greenbacks until all men are paupers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbert836 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. But the farmers need it!
Many poor people can't pay off their debts/mortgages because they won't allow free coinage of silver. We must have it.
Although, I do have my doubts about Bryan. I've been hearing lately about this book On the Origin of Species by a British fellow called Darwin. It's basically saying that man evolved from apes, but when Bryan was asked about it, he seemed terribly intolerant to it. If this Darwin man is right, the party needs to embrace it, for science is the way forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. That Jack Johnson is something else
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 05:39 PM by Dark_Leftist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #59
71. That guy is going to be Heavyweight Champion one day
mark my words. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
65. We need someone who can appeal to moderate Republicans
And we'd better not go with a left wingnut like Bryan. Maybe Cleveland could run again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
66. At least his last name isn't that of the 1920 Democratic Nominee.
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 06:50 PM by ih8thegop
James M. ... :D

You wouldn't believe the discussion I had with a group of people today. We talked about Harding's opponent in the 1920 election, then I pointed out the name of Michigan's Attornety General, and it all went downhill from there.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
67. Typical East Coast banker elitist
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
68. I'm an Alton B. Parker man, myself.
That would be funny only to poli-sci majors. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
69. I keep saying. A populist from the midwest or south would work!
Team him up with Edwards and we can't lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
72. The media killed Bryan
After that scream of his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. McKinley never would have gotten his war
If not for Hearst and the rest of the yellow press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. Never woulda happened if we'd nominated Parker.
Now there's Presidential material!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
75. regardLess of who wins
i wiLL be grooming my handLebar mustache and cracking the heads of the fiLthy irish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
76. Is anyone as concerned by development of some rigid ballon technology...
by the Germans as I am? Have you heard of it? I believe they are calling it after von Zeppelin. I am also quite concerned with the rise of the organization referred to as "The Boxers." Why are Americans so complacent with the obvious signs of threat from overseas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
77. What is his stand on imperialist adventurism by British in the Transvaal
I hear they are making plans for starving and torturing good Dutch settlers and land-owners. I admit to being somewhat ignorant of fact with concern toward the current U.S. candidates and platforms.

By the way, all, I highly recommend the new Berliner Gramophone flat discs over the Edison and Columbia cylinder recordings. I believe they are the modern.
Previously the Sousa marches have been the most popular.
I myself do not care for military music. This Arthur Collins fellow is quite entertaining and I am hoping for more operatic recordings. When do think Caruso will make recordings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
78. kick.
great thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
80. All this bickering
makes me nostalgic for the Whigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Where have you gone, Millard Fillmore?
A nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DelawareValleyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
82. Politics aside, I think we can all agree
that the gasoline powered automobile is just a fad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. My word yes!
Who would want one of those noisy mechanical contraptions other than a self-indulgent idler of the Leisure Class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. And what about those silly flying machines?
What are those silly Wright brothers thinking? They are making fools of themselves. Man will never fly. What a ridiculous idea! Nothing can beat our railroad system!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
85. But he lost so badly in '96-- shouldn't we choose a US Senator?
Someone of stature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Admiral Dewey!
The Whiskers We Want, The Epaulets We Need.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. Yes, we could take the national-security issue away with him.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 05:19 PM by Cuban_Liberal
Does anyone know if he's a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. who cares
anyone named Dewey is a shoe-in in an election for President! I can see the headlines now, "Dewey Wins!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. If he isn't, I know this professor out at Princeton...
Who's looking for something to do. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
86. so you support the war in the Phillippines?
Bryan is our only hope of getting the US troops out of the Phillipines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. See Post 22 above
It's regrettable that we're there, but it be a mistake to withdraw now before we've brought civilization to those benighted savages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. Hands off the Philipines and say no to the Monroe Doctrine !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #86
96. Yeah, sure. Bryan's an imperialist too...
he's just lying to appeal to those of us not so enthusiastic about stealing land and resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Huckebein the Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
95. Has anyone been to one of those moving picture shows ?
fascinating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC