Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Movies that are secretly "republican..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:49 AM
Original message
Movies that are secretly "republican..."
I nominate The Wizard of OZ. I always loved this movie, but seeing it the last time a about a year ago, I got a disturbing thought as my brain was making odd connections:

Okay, the protagonists all need services (Dorothy: transportation, Scarecrow and Tin Man: healthcare, Cowardly: Lion Psychiatric care) and must rely on the stae (Oz) to provide them. The Wizard becomes angry and resentful of these parasites draining Oz's coffers for their welfare. The frightening, gigantic visage (Big Government) of the Wizard of Oz is ultimately revealed as tiny little man. The characters have a confrontation.... Finally the benevolent hand of the government informs the needy ones that they have the ability to solve their problems on their own (bootstrappism) free of the intrusive guidance of social services. I mean, come on, isn't this the message of conservatives to the poor in a nutshell?

Or is this just really strong cough syrup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. No...that has long been discussed and agreed upon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Holy Shizznit! That's great.
Thanks for that... I thought I was hallucinating! I've always loved the Oz books and the 1939 movie, but now I'm faintly disturbed by the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpy the poopthrower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. then read this and feel better...
http://www.wccusd.k12.ca.us/elcerrito/history/oz.htm

in a nutshell -- the Wizard of Oz story is deliberate political allegory with a populist slant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonte_1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "The 6th Day"
Pure conservative agitprop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Easy Rider
Edited on Mon Jul-07-03 11:13 AM by Dr Fate
Two rich upper-middle class dudes deal coke, buy expensive bikes and then exploit prostitutes (just like rich frat-boys going to Grateful Dead shows & strip clubs) instead of protesting, registering voters or doing ANYTHING to advance real Liberal causes...

They claim they are trying to "find America"- but in reality their journey is about self gratification.

This movie personifies that portion of the 60's "left" that was there only for the drugs & sex- they cut their hair and went back to Reagan when the party was over. Dennis Hopper did this in reality, as did many of his counterparts that he was fictionalizing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh man, great choice...
I always wondered why that movie rubbed me the wrong way. Lester Bangs, the great rock critic, had a few interesting things to say about Easy Rider...said something to the effect that he was pissed that this movie that was supposed to be the Rebel Without a cause for his generation featured two leads who were so boring and self-centered.

What are some others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Braveheart
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. nah why you say that
Just because Mel Gibson is a republican. His politics turn me off but Braveheart for me at least makes me have a mild dislike of the English. No offense English DUers its just well you see the Irish Catholic IMO was much like the Black Southerner or the Black South African more like the latter imo but has portions of both. Yes I know Wallace was Scottish but the English were real cruel in their day to all. I know my country is far from perfect historically too so dont remind me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. That's actually why "Easy Rider" is liberal.
There are two moments that indicate that Easy Rider is very much aware of the self-aggrandizing nature of its characters. The first is when Jack Nicholson's character talks about people being most afraid of being free. He's criticizing society in general, but he's also taking a shot at Fonda and Hopper. They're trying to live in peace with others, but they're only going cross-country because of a drug deal. In that sense, they're not really free.

The second part is when Fonda gets after Hopper about their trip at the end of the movie. After they get rid of the drugs, Hopper goes off about how they've solved all their problems..Fonda responds by saying that the two of them had "screwed up." My interpretation of this line is that Fonda sees that he and Hopper are hippies just for the cash and hedonism, as opposed to the people they meet living in the Texas commune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. Agreed
The author of the film, Terry Southern sez:

TS: Well, I'm glad that anger and bleakness came through. Because Dennis Hopper didn't have a clue as to what the film was about. The thrust of the film, from my point of view, the philosophical position is that it's supposed to be an indictment of the blue-collar thing, the truck-driver people of America, for their intolerance and their support of the Vietnam war. It's supposed to be an indictment of the worst part of mainstream Middle America, as personified by those two assholes in the pick-up truck. Bigotry incarnate. And the final sequence is, I guess, the ultimate statement about that mentality, where these two assholes don't like their looks, So that's the ending. And when Dennis Hopper read it he said 'Are you kidding? Are you going to kill of both of them? Yeah, that's what he said, 'kill off', (laughs). So I said, 'Well, that's the only way it can be, because otherwise we're not saying anything, it's just a little odyssey by a couple of irresponsible hippies. So they got to serve some purpose, make some point'. Anyway, that show where he was at.
http://www.terrysouthern.com/quotes.htm

Some nice parallels in that statement to our own time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Great analysis of that pandering piece of shit
When Paul Schrader was a film critic for a LA weekly he was fired because he refused to give that atrocity a good review. It is truly an awful movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classics Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Planet of the Apes
The Omega Man.. basically anything with old shoutgun in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought WoO was about Williams Jenning Bryant
and the politics of long ago? (The book, not the movie).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I thought that too.
Something about the gold standard (hence Oz - ounce)William Jennings Bryan, etc. Had this explained to me in a college history class about 23 years ago. I was fascinated by the story, but haven't heard anything else about it since. Perhaps that's why my memory is so spotty. But each character represented something having to do with either keeping or eliminating the gold standard as the basis for US currency security. Or something like that...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. some interpret it as Baum's sly parody of turn of the century populim
tin woodman- industrial, but no heart
scarecrow-midwestern farmer, no brains
cowardly lion- William Jennings Bryan
wizard- Eastern banker pulling the strings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. On the Watefront
The movie was Wilder's way of explaining why he turned in some of his fellow Hollywood people to McCarthy's Unamerican Activities Committee. The mob was supposed to represent the commies in Hollywood. A good movie with great acting but an incredibly distrubing premise if you know about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I thought it was Elia Kazan, not Wilder
who was the famous turncoat during McCarthyism. A lot of actors wouldn't work with him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It was Kazan.
"Falling Down?" Anyone else remember that reactionary piece of filth? It wasn't very "secret" about its republicanism, I guess.

Remember a movie called "Amos and Andrew," from 1991, starring Samuel L> Jackson and Nicholas Cage? Very anti-"rich liberals." Libs are seen as the real racists, as well as secret sex freaks, hypocrites; black activists are portrayed as self-aggrandizing, violence-loving rabble-rousers, etc. Despicable. I saw it one boring saturday afternoon with nothing to do on network TV and it ruined my week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. But in Falling Down
The main character was obviously deranged, not to mention he got his payback in the end.

YMMV I suppose but I always saw the guy as a sterotypical right wing nutjob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Sure, he dies in the end, but not before spewing his racist nonsense
to the viewing public. How conveinent! I know conservatives who don't see this movie as a liberal bromide using satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. It was Kazan. My bad.
Not good to write about two different movies at the same time on two different boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. please don't confuse Wilder with that rat-bastard Kazan
I've always thought that it was Kazan's attempt to justify his lifetime opportunism. Kazan was just a hack who was only as good as his material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I've never forgiven Kazan
for ruining the careers of many fine people during the McCarthy era. I don't blame the celebs who didn't stand up and cheer for his Academy Award lifetime achievement. Ed Harris looked positively murderous during the Kazan tribute. Another reason to like Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. 'True Lies'
with A'nuld...

the movie makes me want to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. My favorite line from that movie
"you ACTUALLY KILLED PEOPLE!"



"Yes but they were all bad"

actually since Ahhhnold says it is comes out

"yes bud dey wah aahl badt"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Hated that movie
Very wingnut movie. Demeaning to women; demeaning to non-whites. Tom Arnold spews really ugly sentiments: women: can't live with'em; can't shoot'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. I liked True Lies
it has Jamie Lee Curtis in it. If I was straight, I'd have a thing for her.

I was in Key West right after they filmed down there. One of the store people I talked to said that Ahnold was great but Maria was a real beeyach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Like Jamie.
She's cool. She won rave reviews from people here in Atlanta during the Olympics. Very friendly and considerate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. Disagree about True Lies
Yes, it's full of macho military toys. However,

how many GOP women want to have spy adventures in their own right? Remember, she doesn't know it's him in the beginning.

They both discover the person they thought they married doesn't exist. Jamie isn't just a boring secretary. Arnold doesn't really go to computer conventions.

Plus, the daughter has to fend for herself for quite a while against the terrorists. And need I mention that the villian with brains is a woman?

They adjust and wind up at an EQUAL partnership at the end of the movie. That's very LIBERAL in my book.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Good points
about the dynamics of the marriage and how they re-discovered each other. I was turned off by Tom Arnold's character and all the explosions. Arnold's treatment of Jamie also seemed masochistic; he was out to humiliate her in several scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Interrobang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Natural
Robert Redford (a Reagan fan) takes a gritty novel by Bernard Malamud (a famous Jewish writer), cleans it up, takes every shred of ethnicity out of it -- there are NO black faces in the movie (despite the fact that watching baseball at the time was a favourite pastime for black people -- I won't go into the importance of "breaking the colour line" here, but...) and no visibly Hispanic people, despite their presence in the book -- and messes with the plot to make it a product of Reaganism. Bleah.

I like the novel better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Redford's no Bush or Nixon fan, tho.
Was on Nixon's enemies list, speaks publicly about his hatred of the Bush Administration.... hmmm, likes RRReagan though? Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I doubt he liked Reagan
His environmentalism would have made him a natural enemy of the Reaganites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Redford has been very critical
of Bush's environmental policies. Wrote a very hard-hitting letter critical of Gale Norton when she attempted to link him with a condor project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Redford is a solid Dem
Always has been. He lives here in Utah and trust me everyone jokes around about how someone so liberal could live in a state so conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorBombay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. How about Forrest Gump?
Take a look at the paths of the main characters:

Forrest and Jenny grow up the same in Alabama....

Gump- Loves mama, follows orders, joins military, goes into business, becomes filthy stinking rich.

Jenny- rebels, works in strip club, takes drugs, hangs out with Black Panthers, eventually dies of AIDS.

Lt. Dan- After war, is a boozing, angry, womanizer, joins up with Forrest on the boat, has big showdown with "God", then he finds love, gets legs, and becomes rich like Forrest.

The Black Panthers were unfairly protrayed as violent thugs, which was repelling.

Such an overrated film.

While I'm at it, Robert Zemeckis also did "Contact", which was a great film about science until the very freaking end, when it ceases being science and becomes faith. Rubbish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Well Hanks himself is a democrat
all I can say is Thank god hes one of my faves and Bobby De Niro too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I have always felt that movie was...
very RW but have had others inssist I was on crack.

I was thoroughly disgusted with it when it came out and recently rewatched it to se if I had been projecting, but it was even more nauseating the second time.

The thing that struck me most was that Forrest was someone who went through the most volatile time in our country's history yet he never asked questions, kept his head down, and was rewarded for it.

Jenny did the exact oppposite and she ends up with AIDS. Not so subtle message there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Again a bastardization of the book
Still can't beleive that piece of crap beat out Pulp Fiction for best movie. Anyway, the original book was not the kind gentle story - very cynical and much more coarse. Gump & Co. the followup was even more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. The movie just pissed me off
It reduced the 60s to a ridiculous stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. I very much dislike Forest Gump
I'm not into the whole "southerners are stupid" thing. We get enough of that crap on TV, don't need to get it in the movies too.

Having Jenny die of AIDS basically for the crime of having a brain was just too much. We are supposed to believe that everything works out just fine for stupid people like Gump. Well, I actually live in the south, and everything does NOT work out fine for stupid people. They are totally mowed down for the most part and are screwed every which way they turn. In real life, Gump would be in prison for a crime he didn't commit, as retarded people are easier for DA's to prosecute successfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. Ghostbusters
It made the EPA look like an evil agency. Plus, like unrestrained capitalism, it sought to created a desire for something that no one needed: getting rid of ghosts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's a Wonderful Life
I always thought it was liberal because it shows how one person can make a difference. I read though that it has a deliberate message how you shouldn't try to escape from the path that is set down for you. Now I can't think of his name but the famous guy who made the movie was a BIG ole reporker and he deliberately slanted it to put the little guy down. Haha what's funny is that I think most people get the message that no matter how small and unimportant you are YOU can make a differnce, just the message they didn't want you to get from it. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC