Snip:
Selig lapdog Bob DuPuy rushed to his master's defense.
"His comments show a very unfortunate lack of understanding as to what the game is all about. To impugn the efforts of the commissioner over the last 11 years is ludicrous. We're trying to market the game to fans, and his comments show ignorance."
Ignorance of what? Owning one club while ostensibly managing the industry in the best interest of all clubs is a clear conflict of interest. Selig has had that conflict of interest since the day he became Acting Commissioner. Indeed, DePuy's employment as President of MLB only underscores that conflict of interest, inasmuch as his principal qualification for the job is years of service as Selig's personal lawyer.
In fact, if no one at MLB feels troubled by Selig's conflict of interest, MLB might as well reinstate Pete Rose. Conflict of interest rules, like the rule against betting on one's own team, are prophylactic measures intended to protect MLB against even the suspicion that someone might place his personal interests ahead of the game. If Selig's blithe assurance that of course he's acting in the best interests of the game is enough to foreclose all questioning of the propriety of his serving as Commissioner, then why should Rose be banned absent proof that his betting affected his managing?
More here:
http://www.roadsidephotos.com/baseball/bbblog.htm