Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Love is a many splendored thing"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:38 PM
Original message
"Love is a many splendored thing"
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 03:39 PM by CatWoman
I woke up this morning, and that movie was on the telly (I sleep with the telly on).

Um, where there problems employing chinese actresses in the 50's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow you ARE the Catwoman
one of our cats sleeps on the telly too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. smartass!!!!!!
:D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parkening Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about Gengis Khan
played by John Wayne!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. yeah, that's right
that was some scary shit, wasn't it? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes and no
There were some Asian actresses around, mostly Japanese-American, like Pat Suzuki or just plain Japanese, like Oscar-winner Miyoshi Umeki, But Jennifer Jones starred in that movie, for one reason: bankability. 20th Century-Fox was not going to cough up the dough for a very big-budget production back then with a relatively unknown Asian actress (as all Asian actresses were back then) on the lead. If they'd had one that could pull box-office, they would have gone with her. Things are a bit different now, fortunately.
However, I'm left witrh a bit of a bad taste in my mouth when I think about requiring a part to be played by someone of that ethnicity. After all, the point of acting is to be what one is not. Should Shakespeare never have written "Othello" because of difficulty casting a real Moor in 1600's London??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's true
but wasn't Jennifer Jones' character supposed to be biracial? Either way, they probably couldn't have cast a real biracial actress, which is sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, the character was supposed to be EURasian

but even wholly foreign parts - and American indians, etc. - were typically played by caucasians. It was racist, concern the public wouldnt identify with such actors, lack of foreign stars for such roles (note there were some stereotypical roles available).

Some pretty absurd cases.

The Good Earth was all caucasians.

The original Anna and the King (not the KIng and I) had Rex Harrison as the Siamese ruler.

John Wayne as Genghis Kahn.

and many, many more ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah
there are worse cases than "Love is a Many Splendored Thing" considering she was supposed to be biracial. You provided some good examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC