I love it when freepers freak out!!!

[Moonbeam_Starlight]

I post on another board where we debate with loads of different people all over the political spectrum. It is supposed to be a fairly sophisticated debate and we work hard to keep it that way.

Earlier today I posted that article by a Reaganite saying why conservatives should NOT vote for bush and then the NYT editorial today completely criticizing the war in Iraq.

No one posts to them. Not even now is there a single response. Tons of viewings, no responses. So then one of our resident freeper posts a little photoshopped picture about Kerry arming the military with spitballs!

If that's all they've got, they're done!

Just had to share my happiness at watching one particular freeper go off the edge. (It's not really kosher there to simply post jokes as debates...)

[realisticphish]

1. nice lol

when the lame photoshops come out in serious debate, they are scared shitless


:hippie: The Incorrigible Democrat

[lapislzi]

2. Yeah, but when their tiny little heads explode

it's a huge hassle...you gotta call maintenance, and there's paperwork to fill out...those stains will NEVER come out of the carpet...

[Maple]

3. Please post links to:

"that article by a Reaganite saying why conservatives should NOT vote for bush and then the NYT editorial today completely criticizing the war in Iraq."

I'd love to use the articles myself

[NYC Liberal]

6. Seconded.

Please do. :)

[Moonbeam_Starlight]

8. Here

It is FANTASTIC to use for conservatives!!! He makes a good argument.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x798152

He is a big-time fiscal conservative in the classic sense and thinks another bush term would be "catastrophic."

Spread it far and wide, I did!

[Mayberry Machiavelli]

4. The viewings, but no replies, is still good Moonbeam. Some of those

people are reading. Do you post the text or just the link? I assume most people on the board know you are posting from an anti-shrubya perspective (since you have a posting history there), so for them to even click says that many who do ARE reading the article. If you posted the Charley Reese article I think that is an excellent one, very well written and the language not inflammatory at all.

In fact, come to think of it, I'm going to post it now on another board! :o

[Moonbeam_Starlight]

7. Yeah

we have a TON of lurkers at that site, and I think that is who is viewing the articles. I post the link AND the text, that way they are more likely to read it.

[rumguy]

5. that's hilarious

they know Bush is sellin' them down the river...

all they got is their little photoshoped slanders...

LOL.