Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

City Council Wants To Ban The Sale Of Previously Worn Underwear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 01:56 PM
Original message
City Council Wants To Ban The Sale Of Previously Worn Underwear
<snip>

The scourge of skeevy skivvies would be removed from clothing stores if the City Council approves a bill that would ban the sale of previously worn underwear.

The measure, introduced in March by Councilman Tony Avella (D-Queens), would ban stores from reselling undergarments that have been returned for refunds by their original purchasers.

Avella introduced the measure after TV news reports revealed that numerous stores engaged in the practice of reselling underwear that had been returned.

The reports, which aired in November and February on WCBS-TV, showed that returned underwear was offered for sale at national chains such as Macy's, Victoria's Secret, Old Navy, Gap, Lord & Taylor and Saks Fifth Avenue.

The resale of returned underwear is currently legal in the city.

http://www.silive.com/news/advance/index.ssf?/base/news/108557924676101.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PragMantisT Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. What if said underwear was worn on the head
of an Abu Ghraib prisoner.

Hey, that's a great business idea. Take out an ad on freerepublic. Signed by Lyndie English. Only $800 dollars a pair.

They are going fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jukes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. matcom
you're a very sick boy...


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. With or without stains?
That makes all the diffrence, IMO.

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Skeevy Skivvies?"
LOL! :D

Ewww. Just ewww. For that matter, if upscale stores resale used underwear, how would you know? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds reasonable
Nothing like bringing some new underwear home and finding it full of pubes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that happened to me just the other day!
oh wait, those were mine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Next thing they will want them to have their own schools
Second class huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i was wondering what your reaction to this would be
how does it feel to be "banned"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I usually use Ban on my underARMS
Edited on Wed May-26-04 02:27 PM by underpants
not my underPANTS it all started at summer camp and there is a long story involving a rash, insects, and my girlfriend from Canada.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. hmmm. we never really ever MET that Canuk Hottie
wonder why? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. She got around a lot
She dated ALL the guys in band.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. must have worn out her head-gear
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. this is just awful
good thing I buy nothing but solid color boxers in packages of several
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is this a big problem there or something?
I can't recall the last time I went to a garage sale looking for underwear....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Silly me - I always thought one couldn't return underwear that wasn't
Edited on Wed May-26-04 03:14 PM by yellowcanine
still in it's original packaging. Wouldn't that solve the problem? What is the reason anyone would return underwear anyway? It's not as if you get the underwear home and say, "Oh, that doesn't look good on me at all."

On second thought - I guess one might have reason for returning a slinky Victoria's Secret number if it hadn't performed as hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pagerbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. NYC-based porn stars will lose lots of internet sales!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC