Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now I Understand How Economic Crashes Occur

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:43 PM
Original message
Now I Understand How Economic Crashes Occur
Before now, I never really, totally understood how an economic collapse actually happens, but now I do. It's pretty simple really. Crashes occur when people fail to delineate between debt and equity. There's a huge difference between buying something with a credit card and buying something with cash. Our parents and grandparents knew the difference, but today's generation does not.

I've been having knock-down, drag-out arguments with people over Bush's "roaring" economy. A quick look at this chart at the lower portion of this page will tell the story in a nutshell:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/fundsrate.htm

The Fed's monetary policy has kept interest rates at a historic low. Greenspan has been flooding our economy with cheaper and cheaper debt since day one of Bush II's presidency. All of that re-financing and lower-cost borrowing is one of the prime reasons why the market has returned to the 10,000+ level.

Also, add in Bush's increased spending of $441 billion (of borrowed money) in three years, compared to $454 billion (that was paid for) that Clinton spent over 8 years, and you can clearly see that we're borrowing and spending ourselves into this "boom".

Link:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/01/05/national1441EST0604.DTL&type=printable

Sure, today, everyone feels like a wealthy man as all of this borrowed money winds up in corporate coffers and profit statements, and no doubt that the economic indicators are off the chart. But, tell me this, wouldn't you feel like a rich man if you had maxed out 10 credit cards each with a $5,000 limit? How would your economic indicator look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. All you can do is try to "hammer it home" here to those who might open
their minds to listen, Yavin. I get it...but it does seem some folks have it all confused. The ones who are doing well with life on credit as opposed to DU'ers who have been "downsized, outsized, merged" and don't know how they are going to get along.

It's possible we have many who aren't "maxed on credit" though who DO think this Faux Economy which is being Propped by Bush Pals is REAL and they are making money doing "Day Trading." You can't speak to them, they wouldn't listen. Just have to hope some of it sticks so that the Bush Hype doesn't mess up the Democratic Message in the 2004 Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Just Had Another Horrible Thought
Outsourcing will become bigger and bigger. Companies are going to be forced into outsourcing because they're going to be under intense cost-cutting pressures when the debts have to be paid, let alone the foreign competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KFC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. How would you feel rich with $50,000 in credit card debt?
Even with the low cost of money, I avoid debt.

But in a macroeconomic perspective, I think you are on target. That is why we need a Democratic president (and congress) now to soften the coming blow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because KFC You Can See The Difference Between
Debt and equity. Others can run up a credit card and not think twice about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KFC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I guess some people think that they are rich if they have alot of stuff
Debt notwithstanding.

Would you sell housing stocks short just before the next Fed rate announcement? I may take a stab at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. credit is basically a Ponzi scheme...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tadah Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. there will be a stock market bailout...
"Crashes occur when people fail to delineate between debt and equity."

ummmm.... a depression (if I remember right) means that money stops flowing and the economy comes to a halt.

I think that the stock market is going up because people are transfering their assets into the stock market because it promises a higher return than a savings account.

Of course, if everyone decided to cash out in a few months, the stock market would plummet.

I really believe that the Social Security system will be used to bail out the stock market to keep the stock market from crashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jen Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Economic Crashes
I think economic crashes happen because of people's opinions about the economy.

If you think things are getting better and your job is more secure, you will be more likely to spend. If everyone saves their money w/o investing it, a recession is bound to happen.

Personally I think Bush is throwing out tons of money to prop up the economy until November 2004. Then the belt will be tightened and a recession will start again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Agreed. Here's how bush* will pull it off:
Bush was advertising the concept before the market crashed. Then he found other things to blow up on... He'll soon be hyping up the stock market gambit again, people will fall for it this time, and then they will be in the outhouse with no toilet paper and a hole too big to sit on so they fall in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone who thinks the president of the US...
...runs the country, think again.

Read:

"Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country"
by William Greider

That book will provide for you the tip of the iceberg of beginning to understand who does what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm Going To Get That Book
Meanwhile, look at this chart from the Fed. It clearly shows that Greenspan was trying to undermine Clinton's presidency with higher and higher rate hikes:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/fundsrate.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YNGW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Get the book. You'll be glad you did. It's a good start.
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 10:46 PM by YNGW
You'll quickly learn that Central Bankers could care less who's in the White House. Any book I've ever read and all related materials I have ever studied regarding the relationship between the Fed and the WH clearly showed that the Fed took it's orders from no one, they do not have a political agenda, and every WH was constantly at odds with what they hoped the Fed would do. Central Bankers have one objective in mind: The Stable Growth of Money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pretty dire.
If I'm suicidal because of my debt load, the US is truly in the shitter then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lloyd Bentsen, 10/5/88, debate with Quayle:
"You know, if you let me write $200 billion worth of hot checks every year, I could give you an illusion of prosperity, too."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Bentsen, Was Clinton's First Treasury Secretary
I saw him in person walking out the Treasury department one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Greenspan kept rates low during Clinton's terms too
...while debt is buoying the economy, home equity is the source of a lot of the debt which seems to be a good thing. Deflation is the biggest threat to the economy and we have had hints of it during Bush's reign.

Allen Greenspan's fiscal policy really drives the economy.

When Clinton was in office, I knew very little about economics and I remember hearing media announcements about Greenspan's rate changes. I was suspcious and thought he might try to sabotage Clinton's economy but he did not.

When Bush took office, Bush distanced himself from Greenspan according to his buddies Hannity and Rush. Bush wanted to be the master of his own ship, so to speak. But through both the dem and repug adminstrations, Greenspan has acted consistently and I believe that he, more than anyone has been responsible for our economic stability over the last decade. It's late, I'm rambling...just my observation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Greenspan Did Not Keep Rates Low Under Clinton
Look at the history of rate moves on this chart since 1990:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/fundsrate.htm


The lowest rates were under Clinton was 3.25% and that was only at the very beginning. Greenspan raised rates constantly under Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. governments have been "swindling futuriy" for ages
Spending deficit; buying with debt is not a new thing, it's older then credit cards.
Credit cards just make it easier.


1818 - President Thomas Jefferson
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

1881 - President James Abram Garfield (assasinated)
"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."

1966 - Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve
"Deficit spending is simply a scheme for confiscation of wealth."

1920 - Writer Maynard Keynes
"By a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million can diagnose." ("Economic Consequences of the Peace")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC