for those who aren't familiar with him.
The Forgotten Populist:
http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/milk.htmlDiscusses Milk as a populist, not only a gay rights advocate, and there's a lot here that should interest any liberal.
This one is also excellent:
http://www.time.com/time/time100/heroes/profile/milk01.htmlNice little quote from the previous link that explains the atmosphere in which Milk rose to prominence:
When he began public life, though, Milk was a preposterous figure--an "avowed homosexual," in the embarrassed language of the time, who was running for office. In the 1970s, many psychiatrists still called homosexuality a mental illness. In one entirely routine case, the Supreme Court refused in 1978 to overturn the prison sentence of a man convicted solely of having sex with another consenting man. A year before, it had let stand the firing of a stellar Tacoma, Wash., teacher who made the mistake of telling the truth when his principal asked if he was homosexual. No real national gay organization existed, and Vice President Walter Mondale haughtily left a 1977 speech after someone asked him when the Carter Administration would speak in favor of gay equality. To be young and realize you were gay in the 1970s was to await an adulthood encumbered with dim career prospects, fake wedding rings and darkened bar windows.All this stuff was not so long ago. I was in junior high and beginning to experience those "strange twilight urges" when I saw Dianne Feinstein on the news announcing the murders in city hall. I was in college when Warren Burger would write, in an opinion justifying busting into people's bedrooms and hauling them off to jail: "To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching."
The lynchings of
Matthew Shepard and
Billy Jack Gaither were less than five years ago, and in the time since many others have met similar fates, albeit without media attention.
It was only a little over a month ago that I ceased being an unindicted felon in almost half of the states.
Organizations that suck up government funding are exempted from antidiscrimination laws so long as they confine their bigotry to people like me (Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, June 28, 2000) and Bu$hCorp is currently pushing to give more federal funding to discriminatory groups. The vast majority of states hold that firing homos or driving them out of their homes simply for being homos is perfectly OK. Even New York state only passed an antidiscrimination law very recently after the bigots had kept it bogged down in the legislature for three decades. The Congress still hasn't considered the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, a tame little proposal with all sorts of exemptions for matters of "conscience."
So I'm a little puzzled by the implicit assumption in some of the posts here and in the other threads on this subject that attempting to deal with this set of circumstances is to ask for special treatment, or in Freeper lingo, "special rights."