Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's an interesting dilemma about Rush.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
southerngirlwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 01:57 AM
Original message
Here's an interesting dilemma about Rush.
I've read on two conservative web sites that the ACLU wants to go to bat for Rush to keep his medical records private.

(No link; sorry. I don't send those web sites traffic.)

This is interesting. On the one hand, I hate the idea that members' contributions would go to help him.

On the other hand, it puts him in a very tough position. Either accept the help of people he's condemned for years or say no -- but in either case, it makes it tougher for him to go on accusing them of being evil pinkos whose sole mission in life is to destroy America, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. You'd think so- but Sean Hannity doesn't have too much trouble
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 02:03 AM by Cat Atomic
condemning the ACLU, even though they stood up for him when he was just a hate-spewing college radio guy.

There are tons of examples of extreme hypocrisy from guys like this. For Limbaugh, I doubt it would even make a blip on his hypocrisy radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kremer Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. He'd accept their help, wait a little & go back to trashing them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I agree. It won't make a difference. People like Rush have no
conscience and certainly no hypocrisy meter. They are "users" and "abusers" in EVERY sense of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Some of my ACLU $ went to help defend Falwell...
and his bid to keep church assets tax free. Falwell made out rather well, the case was won by the ACLU.

Like everything else in this world, I will not agree with everything a group is doing, sometimes I bitch at the Sierra Club, (OK, only once); but that will not stop me from supporting them.

If Limbaugh gets help from the ACLU to keep his records private, fine...I could not care less what is in his medical records. But this is a criminal investigation, and that should not stop Law enforcement from seeing what is in there; they can well keep it private. Problem is, if Limbaugh were 1/4 the man he thinks he is, he'd say, "go for it". But he is a little man with a fear of the truth.

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blayde Starrfyre Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting dilemma
It's an interesting dilemma. Here we're seeing the absolute morality of the left wing. The ACLU fights for what they believe in, even if it means defending sleazebuckets like Limbaugh or Falwell (who would go on to blame them for 9/11). Certainly it's a contrast to the right wing's moral waffling, like "Hussein's a good dictator, oops, now he's a bad dictator" or "we must liberate the oppressed Iraqis, while providing money to oppress the Palestinians."

What this waffling means is that Limbaugh will take the ACLU's money with no qualms, and then whip around and vilify them when he feels the urge. In the mind of these right wingers, it's no problem. Morality is "what's right for me, right now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Hi Blayde Starrfyre!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Let me bethe 2nd to:...
Welcome you to DU!!!!!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. a rarity, but caught a few minutes of Oh'really - he was bashing ACLU
along with his guest ... as leftist-trying-to-destroy-Christmas and such ... I don't think it was a repeat ... it was 1-2 bash fest ...

and, reading this, that they may lend Rush legal help ...

wonder what Oh'Really thinks of this in view of what he spewed tonight

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why I parted ways with the ACLU
The ACLU opposed Mc Cain-Feingold, and defended unlimited campaign contributions.

Sorry ACLU, that's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. I LOVE it. That would totally shrink his nads if only for a moment
or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. LOL,"shrink his nads"...
nothing there but a couple of grains of sand anyway!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is funny....
I wonder if Limpballs would accept their help
or even if he refused it could they defend
his records anyway?

If he accepts their help it would present pause
to many of his followers to take a closer look
at the ACLU and rethink their usually blind
bias. I am all for helping them to think in
more complex ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coldgothicwoman Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. More complex ways?
I don't know, JPace...it's a big step from:

See Spot Run.

to

See Spot Run...Fast. :silly: :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "See Spot Run"
to his dealer Sally,
See Spot do Oxy-Contin,
See Spot mellow out...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Even if Limbaugh refused help, the ACLU could file an Amicus brief
Much as I'd like to see Limbaugh twist in the wind over this, I tend to agree with the ACLU on this matter. Patient-doctor confidentiality is taken far too lightly these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. it would be great for the aclu to help him
Thats how the church cons so many people. They go help the most desperate and tell them its from Jesus. People can't be mean to those who help them out in their time of need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I don't know about that...
i know a few people that are pretty darn nasty, and would accept your charity, then spit on your back as you walked away. RWer's are infamous for this.

O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Maybe the ACLU just wants his medical records themselves?
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm happy to hear this
this weakens the RW hypocrites even further, shows that not everyone is as cynical as they are.

Reminds me of when Michael Moore debated Jerry Nachman on MSNBC. Nachman accused Moore of being inconsistent on Iraq because he didn't criticize Clinton for Kosovo. In fact, Moore very much DID criticize Clinton for Kosovo, and said so, and Nachman looked very very foolish. It was clear who the hypocrite was.

The RW is taking a lot of blows recently, with Bennett, Dr. Laura, and now Rush. Those are some pretty big voices that have been neutralized quite a bit. They've all been reduced to jokes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Poor me. My witto back hurts!"
Meanwhile, between rounds of golf that seem to do no injury to his back, he attacks those who think the drug companies are milking every cent that they can get from the public and refusing to lower prices for all sorts of needed drugs in the 3rd world.

My heart bleeds at the thought that Rush Moneybags might be embarrassed by what's in his medical records should they become public.

I do contribute to the ACLU but sometimes want to kick them for some of the causes they take up.

Still hoping to see the defender of the downtrodden wealthy doing the perp walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC