Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

tsk, tsk, tsk . . . such language! . . . and in a federal law, no less!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 10:48 AM
Original message
tsk, tsk, tsk . . . such language! . . . and in a federal law, no less!
seems our Member of Congress are now inserting profanity into legislation . . . now kids won't be able to read about the law without being exposed to dirty words . . . for shame . . .

`(b) As used in this section, the term `profane', used with respect to language, includes the words `shit', `piss', `fuck', `cunt', `asshole', and the phrases `cock sucker', `mother fucker', and `ass hole', compound use (including hyphenated compounds) of such words and phrases with each other or with other words or phrases, and other grammatical forms of such words and phrases (including verb, adjective, gerund, participle, and infinitive forms).'.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3687:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. dont you wish
they spent 37 hours in open debate on the floor of the senate over this rather than that whole judges fiasco

i so want to hear Kay Bailey discuss why a couple of those terms shouldnt be used to describe her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Glad to see our Congress
is concerning itself with important matters. Tee-tee, poo-poo, ding-a-ling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. and
bumping uglies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Someone should offer an amendment to include the word "republican."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is why I use the "b" word instead of the "f" word
As in "bush you" instead of "f*** you," or, "Go bush yourself," or, "You're a bush-hole," or, "We are all sooo royally bushed!"

You get the idea. Nothing more profane in the English language than the "b" word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ruh-roh-Wes Clark just used one of the banned words
on C-Span. What will happen to him?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Someone notify George Carlin! They're stealing his act.
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That was my first thought.
Where's George when you need him? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I suppose this representative has nothing better to do
than to waste time on stupid stuff like this.
But I wonder, if we just make these words part of the every day vernacular, then the power they have ....goes away. All the same its gratuitous, uncivil, and banal.

Did this guy have a bad childhood? Are there repressed issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sunuvabitch
maybe Congress should censor itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Heh heh, you said "ass"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC