Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAFTA -- A New NAFTA scam in the works

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:31 AM
Original message
CAFTA -- A New NAFTA scam in the works
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 12:31 AM by Armstead
Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DECEMBER 17, 2003
12:35 PM
Citizens Trade Campaign
http://www.commondreams.org/scriptfiles/news2003/1217-07.htm

In Blow to Corporate-Driven Agenda, U.S. Forced to Complete a Scaled-Down CAFTA Without Costa Rica Agreement
Remains a Threat to Workers, Environment, Public Health, Faces Uphill Battle in Congress

WASHINGTON - December 17 - U.S. negotiators announced the completion of Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) talks today, but with only four nations after Costa Rica walked out yesterday, objecting to U.S. demands that it open its telecommunications and insurance industries to privatization. CAFTA, if passed by Congress, would in effect create a NAFTA-style relationship between the U.S. and the Central American countries of El Salvador, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Guatemala. The Dominican Republic would also be annexed to the agreement, as well as Costa Rica, potentially. CAFTA would have to be approved by the U.S. Congress and by the governments of the Central American nations next year before it could take effect.
Because of concerns over workers rights, investment, access to medicines, the anticipated impact on the sugar and textile industries, strong Congressional opposition to the agreement is expected. A recent U.S. Zogby poll found that the majority of respondents opposed extending NAFTA to other Latin American countries. At a news conference earlier this month, Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI) suggested that CAFTA would fail in Congress due to contentious issues.

"You have Costa Rica walking out of CAFTA talks because it refuses to adopt the Worldcom-Arthur Anderson model of telecom and financial services deregulation, the FTAA nearly imploding in Miami over U.S. demands for expansive investor and intellectual property protections, and the WTO melting down in Cancun," said Lori Wallach, Director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch. "What will it take before the Bush Administration stops desperately pushing the same old NAFTA model that has so clearly failed?"

"CAFTA would further undermine workers' rights in Central America and in the U.S.," said Bill Klinefelter, Legislative and Political Director of the United Steelworkers of America. "Moving forward with this agreement without ensuring safeguards for workers shows clearly that CAFTA is designed to benefit huge multinational corporations at the expense of the workers who make their products. CAFTA would strike a blow against working families in Central America and in the U.S."

Another controversial aspect of the agreement are the new rules it would impose on countries over pharmaceutical patents for life-saving drugs. "CAFTA as completed would deny vital medicines to AIDS and HIV patients," says Gretchen Gordon, Director of Citizens Trade Campaign. "The Bush Administration is going to bat for big drug companies' patent profits while people with AIDS are literally dying for their medicines."

###

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. More like "Shaft-a"
Before these freaks are out of office, we will be lucky to be sweeping floors.:(

I knew Natfa was a bad idea too.. I wish Clinton had never been pressured into signing it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kucinich opposes CAFTA and
NAFTA.See more at his site: http://www.kucinich.us

It seems the Bush administration is interested in the Lowest Common Denominator for existence: lower all standards of wages and health care and the environment to what the poorest nation on earth has to go for.

What really makes me angry is that economic justice should not have to be a political issue. There should be some agreement among the nations for common decency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why can't we..
just get this bastard out of office now?

The longer he stays in, the MORE fucktabluous bills and laws and caftas he pushes forward. By the time Dems get into WH, the place and the country will be in shambles!


RECALL BUSH NOW :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. dems also encourage
fucktabluous bills,laws, and NAFTAsWTOs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. we're getting scammed! nah, couldn't be
CAFTA, NAFTA and the WTO are looking out for us, the little guys.

no Human and Civil Rights protection written into the trade deals, interesting.
</sarcasm>

Central American countries are extremely vulnerable;rich in resources with weak civil protections from Government, poor citizens desperate for opportunities to squeak out a living...Ripe for the picking.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. nope....your wrong ..... the media is looking out for us....they have
all thier 911 invetsigative journalists on this to educate the public ....becuase in a "democracy" the people are given the truth so they can decide (sarcasm off).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddhamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. oh yes, what was i thinking
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC