Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sign of problems in the military ranks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 07:28 PM
Original message
Sign of problems in the military ranks?
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=542&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20031219/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/iraq_us_army

Pentagon Adjusts Iraq Deployment Plans

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon (news - web sites) is sending an additional brigade of the Army's 82nd Airborne Division to Iraq (news - web sites) and extending the deployment there of another 82nd Airborne unit in what officials said Thursday is a minor adjustment to their plan for rotating fresh forces into Iraq next year.

Senior U.S. military officials said part of the 1st Brigade of the 82nd Airborne, which had not been scheduled for duty in Iraq, will begin heading there in January for a four-month tour. The 3rd Brigade of the 82nd, which was scheduled to depart Iraq in February, will remain until April.

The officials, who discussed the matter on condition of anonymity, said these moves were deemed necessary to maintain continuity during the rotation of forces, which runs from January to May.


There likely will be more changes to the overall rotation plan in the weeks ahead, the officials said.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell are they doing with the 82nd Airborne?
So they double the strengh of these type of troops and will rotate out the 3rd and 1st at the end of April. Sound like something is afoot. I don't think it is a 'problem' so much as that they are about to do something and need another Brigade for some kind of special operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think that it is that...
...they are running out of options and have to use who they have. If they were looking at another assault it would make far more sense to rotate another armored brigade in country and not a lightly outfitted airborne unit.

I think I agree with the original poster in that it looks more like they see trouble brewing in teh Resreve/Guard component and are trying to head it off before it gets even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. From CNN transcript - National Guard unit not ready to go yet
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 12:27 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0312/18/wbr.00.html

<snip>BARBARA STARR, CNN PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Wolf, indeed, late breaking word here that many U.S. military families are about to get a very unwelcome Christmas present.

About 3,500 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina, are getting word today, unexpectedly, that they will be going to Iraq right after the holidays.

Now these 3,500 troops, we are told by military officials, were not in the scheduled rotation to go to Iraq. But unexpectedly, they are going. And the reason is a National Guard unit from Washington State that was designated to go, it's been decided that they will stay back for awhile, get some additional training for the types of operations on the streets of Iraq that are needed to root out those insurgents, since it's no longer a combat operation.

So now about 3,500 troops, a brigade's worth from the 82nd Airborne at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina, families getting notified today, we are told, that their troops, that those soldiers, will be going to Iraq unexpectedly right after the Christmas holidays -- Wolf.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
interceptor Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Army's just friggin tired
Nearly everyone's seen duty over there so far. They're just having to shift things around in order to give some units more breaks than others to rebuild. The Navy's going through it as well...we've completely restructured our deployment cycles cause the ships need a break and some overhauls.

They have plenty of bodies over there, its just keeping the ones coming in to equal the ones coming out on the same level of training and readiness that's hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC