Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Voters choose Bush in poll for media.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:03 PM
Original message
"Voters choose Bush in poll for media.
12/29/91

"New Hampshire voters agree the economy is bad, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't vote for President George Bush over the Democratic candidates if the general election were held today, according to a poll conducted for The Concord Monitor and other media outlets by the Washington-based company Political/Media Research Inc.

"The poll of 827 registered voters found that 83 percent of them believed New Hampshire's economic condition was the worst in the country and 60 percent would give Bush just a "fair" or a "poor" overall job performance rating. But, Bush still would get 50 percent of the vote, according to the poll results, which were published early last week.

"Head-to-head with the president, the strongest candidate among the Democrats was former Massachusetts Sen. Paul Tsongas, who got 33 percent of the vote compared to 50 percent for Bush, the poll said. Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Nebraska) and Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton each got 32 percent when paired against Bush, who got 50 percent of the vote if he ran against Clinton and 52 percent against Kerrey.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2003/12/12/192655/06


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how much name recognition had to do with that? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was a GOOD one to pull on us, UFR! :-)
And it took a while to read down far enough to see JUST WHAT you were doing!:D

As we recall, Clinton carried N.H. BOTH times he ran--something I don't think a Dem had done since FDR, who of course ran four times. And something I think our nominee--whoever he is--will do next year, as well.

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. if you click on the bar, just above this map
you can see the red/blue scenerio for the past six prez cycles.

http://www.johnedwards2004.com/map/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POed_Ex_Repub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only numbers that matter to me...
Are the ones that come out in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fixated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares?
No one knows anything about Dean outside of us political-types. La dee da.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Exactly, it's still 11 months away. Anything can change
in that amount of time, right now everybody has the holidays on there minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boneygrey Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for reminding me.
After seeing the recent pollin numbers in NH giving Bush 57 to Dean 30, I thought oh sh*t. I feel much better now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good find...
Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. As always, you people have to be reminded.
The economy worked against the first Bush. It's working for this Bush. Howard Dean might walk on water, but he isn't Bill Clinton. If he polls as badly as he does now, in a neighboring state at the beginning of a recovery, what's he going to look like as the recovery kicks in?

The guy's a loser. You can go through previous election results and polls all you want, but this is not 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. He's never lost before. Why should anyone listen to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boneygrey Donating Member (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. You make a good point
about the economy as an issue. This concerns me greatly.Predictions are for 2004 to be the best economy in 20 years. http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031211/nyth120_1.html

Also, you can bet troops will be leaving Iraq by election time. We need additional issues to pound the pukes with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. The guy's a loser.
But if he beats your guy in the primaries... Wait, what is the definition of loser again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Granite Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Outstanding!
I've been Googling for "December-before-election year polls" to try to find a reference such as this to back up my arguments with repub "friends." Outside of the political junkies, activists and members of the "base" like most of us, no one else is paying attention to the candidates at this point, and incumbency and name recognition are key for most "likely voters". Those that are listening somewhat are getting media spin (Dean=left liberal; Kerry=stiff, New England, Dukakis-like; Clark=fired and disgraced; Kucinich=loony left; Sharpton=Tawana Brawley race baiter; Edwards=ambulance chasing trial lawyer; etc.).

I'm more interested in approval ratings and re-elect numbers, which are trending the way we want them too, right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC