Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McAuliffe is reaching out to Nader & labor leaders calling Harkin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:18 AM
Original message
McAuliffe is reaching out to Nader & labor leaders calling Harkin
Edited on Fri Dec-12-03 11:23 AM by La_Serpiente
This is what I've been waiting for. I see no benefit in making Nader a pariah in the eyes of the Democratic party. I have been critical of McAuliffe in the past, but I congratulate him on this one.

Here is the snippet:

Beggining Article

Reaching out to Nader
Tending to another trouble spot these days is McAuliffe, who sources say has opened up a steady line of communication with Nader over the past three months. The two had lunch in Washington on November 5, the day after Democrats lost gubernatorial races in Mississippi and Kentucky, and spoke most recently Tuesday, shortly before the debate in New Hampshire.

Democrats said McAuliffe, who might speak with Nader again this weekend to talk about his Thursday night fund-raiser in New Jersey, is trying to avoid the mistakes made in 2000, when Nader complained Democratic leaders largely ignored him.

"My assumption is that Nader is running . The working hypothesis is that he's running," one party insider said. "But you don't want him to run and then air these claims that no one from the party ever talked to him."

End article:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

And then Labor leaders across the country are trying to stop Harkin from endorsing Dean.

Beggining Article

Harkin isn't taking sides in the 2004 race, at least not yet. But that hasn't stopped Gephardt's labor allies, who increasingly hear rumblings that the Iowan is moving toward Dean, from mobilizing on the Missourian's behalf.

Harkin got a call Thursday, for example, from Teamsters President James Hoffa, Gephardt's most active and influential ally in the labor community, and the senator is expected to hear this weekend from other labor bigwigs, including Terry O'Sullivan of the Laborers' International Union and Joe Hunt of the Ironworkers union.

In his conversation with Hoffa, sources say, Harkin didn't deny he was mulling a Dean endorsement.

Aides say Harkin is the target of a 360-degree lobbying effort, drawing appeals from all four major Democrats still competing in his home state -- Gephardt, Dean and the Johns (Kerry and Edwards). But while sources say Gephardt's labor allies are good at making their voices heard, Harkin is increasingly moving toward the former Vermont governor.

End article

Rumor had it that Bill Bradley might endorse Dean too.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

Here is the entire article:

Harkin & Nader


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. a Harkin and Bill Bradley endorsement would be great
but we will see how the labor pressure goes. I hope we get Harkin. Bradley would be fantastic on its own too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. A bradley supporter from Harkin's state agrees with you.
They would be "just endorsements" but I would be happy to see them. I'm getting scared by all the anti-Dean stuff on DU over the past few days. I'm fearing we won't come together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. The silence on the part of DU's greens is deafeningly delightful.
The DNC Chair is reaching out to the guy who contributed to four years of the Chimp, and who's support the dems don't even need.

Now, I know that nothing short of adopting the GP's income capping platform will satisfy most greens, but the dems are being pretty magnanimous, wouldn't you admit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, you sound very magnanimous
Let's just hope McAuliffe has a bit more tact than you do when he's talking to Nader. There just may be hope of a coalition yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I hope he has more tact than me too, but don't kid yourself...
Those conversations aren't just sweetness and light. Ol' Terry's also telling Ralph what will happen if Ralph decides to re-enable the chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well jeez, give us time to find the message
before convicting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've written the DNC numerous letters about this..
...not that they necessarily read those things, but I told them they need to embrace the Green and Progressive contingents out there, consumer rights, environmental groups, etc. There's a huge Left contingent - it's just broken up into smaller pieces. If the Dems can embrace the entire spectrum from Middle to Left, including Greens, it might be more of a force of positive change (getting DoucheBoy out of the white house would be a positive change).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. the better to catch flies with honey instead of vinegar. . .
and if Nader still insists on running after all this, then, well, f**k him.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good! We need a strong voting block
to pull '04 off. The more folks we can band together the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gore & Bradley both endorsing Dean - that would be great!
A good start at party unity, tying together the warring factions from the last campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good Grief! Is McAuliffe
still managing things? Thought he was leaving. The guy is a loser who has mismanaged too many democraticc campaigns. Anyone who still wants his services has holes in his head.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Harkin won't go Dean
I just don't think he will. Watching Harkin's politics up close my whole life, Dean isn't his style, and I doubt he'd go against his US Senate colleagues. My bet is that neither him nor Tom Vilsack will endorse anyone.


But hey, I didn't think that Gore would endorse anyone that early either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Harkin is a populist
It wouldn't suprize me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. unless it's for sure
Harkin won't bet on a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. No, Harkin Is Very Dean
And Harkin is quite fond of Al Gore, and vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. hey I'm not going to dispute you
Perhaps he is. Don't count your chickens before they hatch though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Re: Gore endorsing "early"
But hey, I didn't think that Gore would endorse anyone that early either.

I'm surprised by the surprise. Gore said he'd endorse, and he quite specifically said it'd be at this stage of the process -- when the endorsement matters a lot. It was no secret to any of the nine campaigns.

I took him at his word. And of course he kept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. congrats
on that endorsement, BTW. Kucinich is my guy, As DK put it, "I wasn't expecting it anyways."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. nader has made himself a pariah
If he is being contacted it is to try and buy him off. In my judgement that would be a really dumb move. The best option would be to counter attack his lies which is what they should have done in 2000... or simply ignore him. I doubt he is getting much more than 1 percent of the vote this time around if that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC