Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A setback for the Gay Agenda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:06 AM
Original message
A setback for the Gay Agenda
You know the agenda, Human beings wanting to be treated like human beings. How dare they. The Lafayette Parish (Louisiana) school board anquished for three hours and finally voted 5 to 3 against apologizing to a mother of a 7 year old boy who was punished for having the audacity to tell a classmate that his mother was gay. The boy brought home a note to his mother from his teacher which said "he explained to another child that you are gay and what being gay means." The horror of it all. Will our nation survive? A Baptist seminarian from Lafayette says he trusts the school superintendants version of events, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS CONTRADICTED BY WRITTEN REPORTS. Don't let facts get in the way of a Baptist Seminarian and his incubation of hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KensPen Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am truly baffled....
by the degree of hate exhibited by some Southern Baptists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would be interested to know just what the school board would

have gay peoples' kids say.

Is it their contention that the children should lie?

Tell others who ask why they have 2 moms/dads that they are not allowed to say? That the information is classified?

Hang their heads in shame and burst into tears?

Why not just ban children of gay parents from attending the school?

Bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. f'ed up.
What exactly *is* the school superintendent's version of events? :wtf: I figured they would try to justify the school's response, but now they're trying to somehow argue that the mother and son *lied* about what happened?

For all the effort people like this Baptist seminarian put into evangelism, their hate-filled bs turns a lot more people off than on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sorry
I left out that detail. The school board contended the boy was disciplined because he was being "disruptive" in class. However, eye witnesses and the teacher's version (in other words, the truth) has been ably documented. It must take a lot of testosterone to pick on a seven year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KensPen Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. I listen to Stern and enjoy him.....
and from time to time he has on a family of loons from "god hates faggots .com" what is scarey is that the level of viscious hatefulness this family exhibits is not unique.

I wonder what fuels a passion of hatred to burn so intensely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. It was a truly disgusting matter...
handled in a truly disgusting way.

BTW, I think you should probably use the term "gay cause" rather than "gay agenda." The right wingers use that phrasing to imply that gays are an organized bloc determined to press "their" agenda on the rest of us proper god-fearin' folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks
You are right, however, I like to point out the lunacy of the right wing "agenda." I'd like to take that agenda and ram it up their butts and destroy some braincells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. i have tried to avoid this piece of news
but this is simply grotesque and barbaric.
but i have been contending that religous conservatives mean real physical harm to certain members of our society -- gay people are certainly at the top of the list, but dedicated straight liberals are up there too. they are evil and intend on spreading their version of religous poison however they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. i hope i don't have to cite my creds as a supporrter of GLB rights but....
i have an issue here. there has to be a consideration of the rights of parents to determine when they introduce their children to the concepts of sexuality in all forms. seven years old is pretty young.

i actually have discussed this issuem when it first surfaced with some gay friends and they were 3 to 1 on the idea that all should parents teach their children that cettain things, such as income or family dynamics are personal to the family. NOT shameful, just private.

we never did read the context of how this subject came up but it isn't a cut and dry thing imho. if a kid is asked what his daddy does by the teacher, like as an essay, the teacher should be counseled as to how to avoid such problems. if a kid asked another kid the question, that's a tougher answer. but, there should be a consideration for parents of the rest of the kids as to how and when they choose to introduce the idea of sexuality in their home.

i'm not totally firm on this but maybe 80% that at that age, what happens at home, in many arenas, should stay at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. sexuality...
Is the statement "I have two moms" inherently sexual? Any more than saying "I have a mom and a dad"? The kid didn't say anything about what his moms do in the bedroom... his moms probably try not to expose him to that anyway.

(I don't know how the children of gay parents feel, but I sure was revolted by the idea of my mom and dad doin' it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. if you have a mom and a dad
Edited on Fri Dec-12-03 11:20 AM by veganwitch
its kinda implicit that they had sex to create you. not so much for a same sex relationship.

it just shows the hetrosexist nature of american society when a hetrosexual relationship which can create children is not considered "sexual" but when you mention you have a same sex partner, any discussion of it automatically conjures images of how that would work in bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If a kid asks another "where do babies come from?"

and the other kid tells him, then yeah, if the parents had hoped that they would be the ones to tell the kid about it, they are out of luck.

Similarly, if a kid asks another kid what does gay mean, and the other kid tells him, parents who hoped that their kids wouldn't find out gay people existed until next year are out of luck.

This is not new, it is one of the risks parents take when they delay telling their children about sexuality.

If you really feel strongly that this is something that children should hear about from their parents first, better start talking early!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC