Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT OpEd: BBV/Voter Verified PAPER Ballots!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 01:22 PM
Original message
NYT OpEd: BBV/Voter Verified PAPER Ballots!
With the help of $3.9 billion in federal funds set aside to improve elections, states have begun the move to electronic voting machines. The new A.T.M.-style machines are easier for most people to use and undeniably faster. But recent glitches in Virginia and Florida have revived questions about how to recount a computerized vote after a close or suspicious election. New machines can already print a total of all votes cast, but that is simply a reflection of the computerized tally. What is needed is a paper record of each voter's choices that the voter can verify.

The most reasonable answer is to require that the machines be equipped with printers that will produce what Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, calls a "parallel paper record" of the vote. That makes sense to us. Like deeds, diplomas and other vital public documents, the nation's votes still need to be preserved somewhere on paper.

more

and there's more to come from Krugman and according to the tea leaves (well, coffee grinds) in this cup here... there's something coming later this week...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. A Paper Trail by Itself is Only Half the Solution
the papers need to be collected AT the polling place to be used in the event of a recount. The manual recount is what provides the verfication.

Otherwise, the paper is useless -- it may have no relation to what the voting machine records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. the way i read the editorial
they are 100% on the right track.

a voter verified, preserved record of each vote.

of course, a 'trail' is useless if not VVPB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well I would sure like someone to address the people
who started these companies. Todd and brother Bob Urosevich getting the money from billionaire Theonomic Reconstructionist Howard Ahmanson and Mr Alex Kantarovich of Minsk, Belorussia, who owns Vikant Corp. in Chicago which supplies the control cards to ES&S. He won't say where the cards are made. He says he obtained his degree in the Soviet Union but he also got an MBA from Georgia State University and became a CFA charter holder in 2000. He joined Aton Capital in 2002 as chief strategist. He speakes Russian and English fluently.

What's with all these Russian sounding names and how and why did they almost get away with complete control over our voting system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Biggest question about "Paper Trail"...
why is Diebold SO AGAINST this?????

For ALL of the other touchscreen/scanner machines they produce, from ATM's to Store Scanners...there is ALWAYS a paper trail!

Yet, when it comes to voting machines, we are suypposed to "Trust" them. Nobody else does...banks, chain stores, grocery stores, mom and pop stores......NOBODY! But the American public is supposed to just blindly accept that these people are so honest it is wrong to question them.

HOLY CRAP! NOBODT trusts these machines, that is why there is paper verification. Are we so stupid as to allow these people to be trusted with our VOTES, when we can't trust a machine for a $20 transaction?


O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is incredible! Look at how far we've come on this issue!
A year ago no one knew what we were talking about - now it's the lead editorial in the paper of record. AMAZING! We might actually beat them on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Let's hope somethin really comes of it
NY Times is talking about it. So is USATODAY.

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1206-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. stay tuned...
as i suggest in the first post... there are more stories to come.

krugman will follow up. it was a HUGE issue at the FL Convention. the candidates will HAVE to address it. they did in FL. they named DIEBOLD....

it ain't going away.

www.blackboxvoting.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. That's great news! :)
Glad it won't fade from the headlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Paper Ballots
The vote must be counted using paper Ballots. We can not trust the machines to do ANY official counting. Not unless the source code is simple enough for just about everybody to read and understand!

They are on the ropes.....let's not let them get away with using corrupted machines to do any official counts or we'll be right back to square one.

PS... has this process been amazing, or what?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. phone numbers of people who can stop Black Box Voting
The Voter Confidence Act, HR 2239, which would require voter-verifiable paper ballots for touchscreen voting machines, is presently in the Committee on House Administration.

Ask House members to cosponsor The Voter Confidence Act, HR 2239.
Ask Senators to introduce a companion bill in the Senate.


Please call Republicans and tell them that Rep. Tom Davis III (R-VA), Rep. Christopher Shays (R-CT), and Rep. Charles Bass (R-NH) are co-sponsors.

Please call Democrats and tell them that the bill was introduced by Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), and has 84 cosponsors.

Ask the people below to cosponsor The Voter Confidence Act, HR 2339.
Committee on House Administration

Republican Committee Members
Rep. Robert W. Ney, Chairman (OH) Phone: 202-225-6265
Rep. John T. Doolittle (CA) Phone: 202-225-2511
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers (MI) Phone: 202-225-3831
Rep. John Linder (GA) Phone: 202-225-4272
Rep. John L. Mica (FL) Phone: 202-225-4035
Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (NY) Phone: 202-225-5265

Democratic Committee Members
Rep. John B. Larson, Ranking Member (CT) Phone: 202-225-2265
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (CA) Phone: 202-225-7924
Rep. Robert Brady (PA) Phone: 202-225-4731


"It is especially important to get support from members of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, especially Republicans, since that committee would handle the bill." -verifiedvoting.org

Ask the people below to introduce a Senate version of The Voter Confidence Act, HR 2339.
Senate Rules and Administration Committee

Republican Committee Members
Trent Lott, Chairman (MS) Phone: 202-224-6253
Ted Stevens (AK) Phone: 202-224-3004
Mitch McConnell (KY) Phone: 202-224-2541
Thad Cochran (MS) Phone: 202-224-5054
Don Nickles (OK) Phone: 202-224-5754
Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) Phone: 202-224-5922
Bill Frist (TN) Phone: 202-224-3344
Gordon Smith (OR) Phone: 202-224-3753
C. Saxby Chambliss (GA) Phone: 202-224-3521

Democratic Committee Members
Chris Dodd, Ranking Member (CT) Phone: 202-224-2823
Robert C. Byrd (WV) Phone: 202-224-3954
Daniel K. Inouye (HI) Phone: 202-224-3934
Dianne Feinstein (CA) Phone: 202-224-3841
Charles E. Schumer (NY) Phone: 202-224-6542
Tom Daschle (SD) Phone: 202-224-2321
Mark Dayton (MN) Phone: 202-224-3244
Richard J. Durbin (IL) Phone: 202-224-2152

If you need more information on the Voter Confidence Act, HR 2239, visit:
http://holt.house.gov/issues2.cfm?id=5996
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am SO glad that BBV is getting the long over due attention it deserves..
Yet there is another issue that goes hand in hand with the computerized voting machines, and that is.......
The scubbing of legitimate voters off the voter rolls.
_____________________________________
"Thursday, December 4, 2003

Greg’s Letter Printed In The New York Times

Re: Paul Krugman’s Op-Ed on December 2

To the Editor:

Paul Krugman ("Hack the Vote," column, Dec. 2) warns against the danger of computerized voting machines, but the real danger is the new, federally mandated computerization of voter rolls.

As he mentions, the disaster in Florida in 2000 was the wrongful disenfranchisement of voters.

Katherine Harris's office, using a computerized database with known faults, misidentified these citizens as felons, then purged them from voter registries.

Last year, with little fanfare and less scrutiny, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, which effectively orders all states to buy the computerized voting machines that Mr. Krugman rightly dreads. Worse, the law requires all states to computerize their voter rolls and purge those lists of suspect voters, à la Florida.

Heaven help us when President Bush and Congress tell us that they are going to "help" us vote."

GREG PALAST New York, Dec. 2, 2003

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=297&row=1
___________________________________________
Something else to think about and keep in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. thanks! i didn't check letters today...

so true.

all the CHAD nonsense was distraction.

the CRIME in FL was the voter purge and electronic tampering.

i did not know about this new requirement.

obviously, in the hands of felons like Harris and Jebby, this is another guarantee of repuke fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Rigged machines are bad enough......
But if you can't even get to the machine to vote because your names been wrongfully scrubbed? GGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRR :mad:

Repiglithugs, I'm convinced, will go to any underhanded, devious, even heinous lengths to achieve their goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Help America Vote Act requires that people be allowed
The Help America Vote Act requires that people be allowed to vote with a "provisional ballot" if their names were illegally purged.

Poll watchers should make sure there are enough provisional ballots before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Who Runs Matters No if The Vote Doesn't Count as Cast
Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sexybomber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Finally, some decently good news (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC